Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

When intolerable workplace conditions force an employee to resign

June 19, 2026

Employers who fail to pay pension contributions can be forced to pay from their own pockets

June 19, 2026

Everyone wanted this Bentley, but only one owner had the right to sell it

June 19, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • When intolerable workplace conditions force an employee to resign
  • Employers who fail to pay pension contributions can be forced to pay from their own pockets
  • Everyone wanted this Bentley, but only one owner had the right to sell it
  • Excluded Xihahele households awarded R21.4 million in land restitution settlement
  • South Africa’s migration tensions reveal deeper economic and governance failures
  • Huawei Care misled consumers by promising theft cover but excluding thefts that did not involve force
  • Home Affairs says there is no deadline for foreign nationals to leave South Africa
  • New acting judges’ rules introduce a 12-year legal experience requirement from 1 July 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » High Court confirms interdict against police colonel over threatening messages
Civil Law

High Court confirms interdict against police colonel over threatening messages

Johannesburg judge rules in favor of whistleblower family intimidated through violent texts
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 4, 2025Updated:September 4, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
The Johannesburg High Court found that threats sent to a whistleblower family were linked to Parkview SAPS, implicating a senior officer.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Court finds police colonel responsible for threats, intimidation, and racist slurs.
  • Applicants acted without lawyers but secured vital protection.
  • Judgment exposes troubling lack of accountability within the police and prosecution.

“You will be shot. Your wife will die first. Your child will be next.” These chilling messages terrorised a Johannesburg family for years. The South Gauteng High Court has confirmed that they came from a senior police officer.

The Johannesburg High Court has ruled against Lieutenant Colonel Fatima Gaffoor, confirming an interdict to protect Mr and Mrs M, who stood up to intimidation despite being without legal representation. For them, the ruling is not just a court order, but recognition of years of fear, silence, and neglect.

The judgment outlines a disturbing pattern of harassment beginning in 2020. The threats escalated quickly, from insults to explicit death warnings. One message read: “Your wife will be shot first and then your child will [be] next before u r killed like a dog.” Another stated: “Ur not GAFFOOR i am … withdraw your cases. BANG BANG.”

The links to Gaffoor were overwhelming. Messages came from numbers tied to her identity documents, referred to her by name, and referenced legal action taken against her. Some even tracked the family’s movements from Parkview, where she was stationed.

Despite this, the National Prosecuting Authority declined to pursue charges, leaving the family to fend for themselves. Even after Mr M. obtained a protection order in 2021, the threats continued, becoming more violent and brazen.

The court’s findings

Judge SDJ Wilson found it more likely than not thatGaffoor was the “prime mover” behind the intimidation. Her attempt to claim she was the victim of a police conspiracy fell apart under cross-examination.

The judgment also found that the police and prosecution ignored strong evidence, allowing years of impunity. “No one in the police force appears to have sought either to exonerate her or hold her accountable,” the judge noted, calling the NPA’s refusal to prosecute “inexplicable.”

Protection and costs awarded

The court confirmed the interdict, prohibiting Gaffoor from any further threats or harassment, either directly or through others. The Minister of Police was ordered to enforce compliance, while the applicants received costs for their efforts.

Conviction.co.za

Human Rights intimidation Johannesburg High Court Police accountability witness protection
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Everyone wanted this Bentley, but only one owner had the right to sell it

June 19, 2026

South Africa’s migration tensions reveal deeper economic and governance failures

June 18, 2026

Child in R31 million medical negligence claim awarded R2.8 million for urgent care

June 17, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 3   +   9   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Employment and Labour Law Series
6 Mins Read

When intolerable workplace conditions force an employee to resign

By Ann-Suhet MarxJune 19, 20266 Mins Read

Recent Labour Court and CCMA decisions show how ignored grievances, workplace bullying, retaliation and unreasonable changes to working conditions can amount to constructive dismissal.

Employers who fail to pay pension contributions can be forced to pay from their own pockets

June 19, 2026

Everyone wanted this Bentley, but only one owner had the right to sell it

June 19, 2026

Excluded Xihahele households awarded R21.4 million in land restitution settlement

June 19, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Standard Bank should have investigated mental health concerns before dismissal, CCMA finds

June 10, 2026

Foreign nationals leave SA amid growing tension ahead of planned 30 June deadline

June 17, 2026

Attorney who blames secretary is like surgeon blaming nurse, judge says

June 18, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by