Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students

July 26, 2026

Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises

July 25, 2026

African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children

July 25, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students
  • Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises
  • African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children
  • Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa
  • From rock samples to rocking the stage: Gavaza Mongwe advances to Mrs SA Top 30
  • Why the High Court sided with Ramaphosa in the Phala Phala impeachment battle
  • SCOPA chair Zibi says RAF’s declining performance triggered Parliament’s inquiry
  • D-day for law firm to repay R500 000 property deposit after holding money for nearly nine years
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Baby Savers SA urges South Africans to oppose the proposed ban on life-saving baby boxes
Special Reports

Baby Savers SA urges South Africans to oppose the proposed ban on life-saving baby boxes

Advocacy group warns that the government’s plan to criminalise Baby Savers endangers infants and desperate mothers.
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterOctober 10, 2025Updated:October 10, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

• Baby Savers SA warns that a proposed amendment will outlaw safe baby relinquishment.
• Gauteng Social Development Department accused of defying court order and spreading misinformation.
• Call for public solidarity to protect vulnerable women and children before the 25 October 2025 deadline.

Baby Savers South Africa, a national coalition of non-profits dedicated to preventing unsafe infant abandonment, is urging South Africans to stand up for the country’s most vulnerable citizens, newborn babies, and women with nowhere safe to turn.

The group has condemned a proposed legal amendment that would criminalise the use of Baby Savers, monitored baby boxes that provide a life-saving alternative for desperate mothers. “These boxes are not just metal and padding,” it said in a statement. “They are a bridge between life and death for babies who might otherwise be left to die.”

From innovation to controversy

The first Baby Saver was installed in July 1999 at Door of Hope Children’s Mission in Berea, Johannesburg. Designed to provide desperate mothers with an anonymous and safe alternative to abandoning their babies, these devices trigger an alarm when a baby is placed inside, allowing caregivers to respond immediately.

Since then, Baby Savers have rescued hundreds of infants, some adopted, others reunited with families, all given a second chance at life. However, in 2023, the Gauteng Department of Social Development ordered all Baby Savers to shut down, claiming they were operating illegally. When Door of Hope refused, the department threatened to close the organisation entirely, prompting urgent legal action in the Pretoria High Court.

The court granted an interim order allowing Baby Savers to continue operating until January 2026 and compelling the department to treat the organisation as registered and entitled to state support. Yet the department has reportedly ignored the order, withholding funding and statutory services while spreading claims that “Baby Savers lead to child trafficking.”

Legal standoff and looming amendment

In February 2025, Baby Savers SA filed a main application seeking to have sections of the Children’s Act declared unconstitutional for not recognising safe relinquishment. But before the courts could rule, the department published a proposed amendment redefining the use of Baby Savers as “abandonment,” effectively criminalising the act before the matter could be heard.

“The department is acting as though South Africa is not a democracy,” said Baby Savers SA. “They are declaring Baby Savers illegal before the courts or the public have had their say.”

The department argues that anonymous relinquishment violates a child’s right to family and identity. But Baby Savers SA insists the right to life comes first. “The mothers who use these boxes are not criminals,” the organisation said. “They are victims of poverty, violence, and social rejection, women who want their babies to live.”

Women silenced, babies endangered

The consequences of bureaucratic resistance are already visible. Two teenage mothers were recently refused the right to place their babies for adoption, even with parental consent. Others report being forced to “bond” with their infants before hospital discharge or being ignored entirely by social workers.

“The proposed amendment tells women that dumping a baby in a field is more acceptable than placing one safely in a monitored, padded Baby Saver,” said Baby Savers SA. “It criminalises compassion and endangers life.”

For now, the future of Baby Savers hangs in the balance. As the deadline for public submissions approaches, Baby Savers SA is calling for national unity and civic action.

“Submit your objections to the Bill by email to matlhogonolos@dsd.gov.za, ntopot@dsd.gov.za, and luyandamt@dsd.gov.za before 25 October 2025,” the organisation urged. “Our children need your help, and South Africa needs your voice.”

“The proposed amendment tells women that dumping a baby in a field is more acceptable than placing one safely in a monitored, padded Baby Saver.” – Baby Savers SA.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Baby Savers South Africa child protection Department of Social Development Infant Abandonment Prevention Safe Relinquishment
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

Related Posts

Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students

July 26, 2026

From rock samples to rocking the stage: Gavaza Mongwe advances to Mrs SA Top 30

July 24, 2026

Judiciary honours Judge President Jappie’s legacy of justice and constitutional service

July 13, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 1   +   9   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Special Reports
3 Mins Read

Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students

By Conviction Staff ReporterJuly 26, 20263 Mins Read

The Unisa Law Clinic is inviting donations of quality pre-loved business attire to help LLB students prepare for interviews, court observations and practical legal training.

Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises

July 25, 2026

African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children

July 25, 2026

Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa

July 24, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

Wedding rehearsal or workplace protest? Judge rules in favour of singing mineworkers

July 21, 2026

Labour Court stops municipal disciplinary hearing over AI citation concerns

July 22, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by