Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

What people keep getting wrong about SA marriage law, and why they end up in court

May 1, 2026

Workers’ Day: What AI readiness means for your world of work and the future of employment

May 1, 2026

When prison is no shame in a society where corruption becomes a badge of success

April 30, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • What people keep getting wrong about SA marriage law, and why they end up in court
  • Workers’ Day: What AI readiness means for your world of work and the future of employment
  • When prison is no shame in a society where corruption becomes a badge of success
  • Husband fails to settle levies debt by offering property he co-owns with ex-wife
  • Legal crackdown sees attorney struck off, another suspended, and fees pursued
  • Home Affairs unlawful detention stops deportation of Nigerian father of three
  • Parents who fight continuously turn their baby’s first year into a courtroom battle
  • Former UCT housing residents can continue living in parking lot after winning eviction battle
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Labour Court punishes employer for ending Covid work-from-home arrangement
Labour Law

Labour Court punishes employer for ending Covid work-from-home arrangement

Cape Town Labour Court overturns CCMA ruling, awarding compensation after employer’s response to illness and remote work dispute destroyed trust.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliNovember 26, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Lewis was constructively and unfairly dismissed after the employer mishandled medical leave and reversed prior approvals.
  • Internal grievance procedures were deemed unreasonable, given the total breakdown of trust.
  • The Court emphasised that employers must act in good faith and follow fair procedures when responding to employee illness and accommodation requests.

Adele Lewis, the former Chief Performance Officer at Van De Venter Mojapelo (Pty) Ltd, resigned in late 2023, claiming constructive dismissal. This followed the employer’s withdrawal of remote work privileges and mishandling of her medical leave.

Lewis relocated from Gauteng to Cape Town in 2020 with the company’s approval during the Covid-19 lockdown, believing the arrangement was permanent. The employer later demanded her return to Gauteng due to operational needs. Lewis requested to postpone her return for personal and medical reasons, and was later booked off for anxiety and depression.

Court’s assessment of constructive dismissal

Acting Judge PS MacKenzie carefully examined the circumstances surrounding Lewis’s resignation. The court reiterated the Labour Appeal Court’s standard for constructive dismissal. “The test,” the judge said, “is objective... the employer’s conduct and its cumulative effect must be such that, seen objectively, the employee could not reasonably be expected to cope. Resignation must have been a reasonable step for the employee in the circumstances.”

The judgment highlighted that the employer’s approach escalated tensions. The court found that compassion was replaced with confrontation, turning a medical issue into a disciplinary dispute. The employer’s sudden reversal from acceptance to accusation, the court said, destroyed any remaining trust.

The court noted that what should have been a routine sick-leave process became the decisive rupture that made continued employment intolerable. Managerial overreaction and inconsistency, the court found, resulted in a total breakdown of the employment relationship.

The court concluded that any internal grievance procedure would have been futile and would not have provided Lewis with a reasonable alternative remedy.

Review of the CCMA award

The CCMA commissioner found that Lewis was not constructively dismissed. Lewis challenged this, stating the commissioner ignored crucial evidence and misapplied legal principles. The employer argued that Lewis resigned voluntarily and had other options.

Judge MacKenzie disagreed with the commissioner, stating that the employer’s sudden change in medical leave and withholding of salary breached the implied term of mutual trust and confidence. While ending remote work was lawful, the manner in which the employer handled Lewis’s illness and leave request was unreasonable.

Conclusion and award

The court replaced the CCMA award with a ruling that Lewis was constructively and unfairly dismissed. She was awarded R310 571.19 in compensation, covering lost salary and three months’ pay. Each party was ordered to pay their own costs.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Clickhere to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

CCMA constructive dismissal Covid-19 employee rights Labour Court
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Wrong hearing loss compensation formula costs Rand Mutual dearly

    April 29, 2026

    Security giant fails to stop former executive from joining rival company

    April 29, 2026

    Labour Court warns urgent roll is not a casino, orders lawyers to personally pay costs

    April 28, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 9   +   5   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Marriage Series
    6 Mins Read

    What people keep getting wrong about SA marriage law, and why they end up in court

    By Ann-Suhet MarxMay 1, 20266 Mins Read

    In the final article of the Marriage Series, Ann-Suhet Marx examines the legal myths that continue to mislead South African couples on property, debt, and marital rights, often with costly consequences.

    Workers’ Day: What AI readiness means for your world of work and the future of employment

    May 1, 2026

    When prison is no shame in a society where corruption becomes a badge of success

    April 30, 2026

    Husband fails to settle levies debt by offering property he co-owns with ex-wife

    April 30, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    What people keep getting wrong about SA marriage law, and why they end up in court

    May 1, 2026

    Workers’ Day: What AI readiness means for your world of work and the future of employment

    May 1, 2026

    When prison is no shame in a society where corruption becomes a badge of success

    April 30, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.