- Mortuary found inconsistent with the burial-only restriction, interdict granted.
- The cemetery board was declared illegitimate due to failure to hold AGMs and exclusionary control.
- Court orders reopening of membership and election of new governing body
Plans to build a mortuary at a historic Muslim cemetery in Cape Town have been stopped after the High Court ruled that the land is strictly reserved for burial and nothing else.
Judge Gayaat Da Silva Salie found that the proposed development fell outside the permitted use of the property and granted a final interdict, barring any mortuary from being built or operated on the site.
Dr Tolgah Bassier brought the application against the Moslem Cemetery Board, taking aim at both the mortuary project and the legitimacy of the board itself. At the heart of the dispute was a restrictive title deed stating that the cemetery must be used “solely as a burial place for Moslems”, a condition the court treated as decisive.
The court held, “The said cemetery has been purchased and shall be used solely as a burial place for Moslems,” confirming that the wording fixes the purpose of the property and limits any attempt to expand its use.
Burial purpose is strictly interpreted
The Moslem Cemetery Board argued that the mortuary would support burial practices and should be seen as ancillary to burial. It described the facility as necessary infrastructure to assist with the preservation and preparation of bodies.
Judge Da Silva Salie rejected this argument, warning that the concept of what is “ancillary” cannot be stretched beyond reasonable limits. The court stated: “Whilst certain preparatory acts may be closely connected to burial, the concept of what is ‘ancillary’ cannot be extended without limit.”
The judgment makes clear that accepting the board’s argument would open the door to a creeping expansion of activities unrelated to burial, gradually undermining the restrictive wording of the title deed and eroding the original purpose of the cemetery.
The judge found that the mortuary was not incidental to burial but a separate and substantial development in its own right. The court held, “The proposed facility cannot properly be characterised as incidental to burial but constitutes a distinct use which falls outside the purpose for which the property was set aside.”
The court also paused to reflect on the nature of a cemetery, describing it as a place of dignity and stillness. The judgment states, “A cemetery is, by its nature, a space that must remain safe, orderly and undisturbed,” reinforcing that the proposed development conflicted with that character.
Governance failure and illegitimacy
The case also exposed serious governance failures within the Moslem Cemetery Board. It was common cause that no Annual General Meetings had been held for roughly 15 years, effectively shutting the broader Muslim community out of any meaningful say in how the cemetery was run.
Acting Judge Da Silva Salie found that this breakdown struck at the legitimacy of the board itself. The court stated, “A body of persons cannot assume control of a communal institution of this nature without recourse to mechanisms that ensure accountability to the community it serves.”
The board pointed to a 2020 constitution to justify its authority, but the court found no evidence that it had been adopted through a proper and inclusive process. Years of bypassing basic governance procedures had created, in the court's view, a full-blown legitimacy crisis.
As a result, the court concluded that the current board could not be recognised as a lawful or representative body.
Membership cannot be restricted to lineage
The court also took issue with the argument that membership of the cemetery board should be limited to descendants of founding families and rejected it outright.
The judgment clarified that while lineage is one way to qualify for membership, it cannot be used as a barrier to exclude others. The court stated, “Membership is instead regulated through inscription in a registration book and is extended to persons ‘interested or concerned’ in the cemetery.”
The court emphasised that the cemetery serves a broader, evolving Muslim community, and that its governance must reflect that reality rather than remain in the hands of a narrow hereditary group.
Court orders structural reform
Beyond stopping the mortuary, the court ordered a complete reset of the cemetery’s governance. The Moslem Cemetery Board has been directed to reopen membership registration to the wider Muslim community, giving qualifying individuals the opportunity to apply.
A Special General Meeting must then be convened within sixty days to elect a new governing body. That body will decide the fate of the partially constructed structure, but only within the strict limits of burial use.
The court also placed the process under supervision, requiring a report within ninety days detailing compliance and outcomes.
In granting the final interdict, the court confirmed that the mortuary cannot be built, completed or operated on the property. Each party must bear its own legal costs, while the costs of mediation are to be shared equally.
Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.
