- The High Court has appointed an independent investigator to examine claims of misconduct within a Maboneng body corporate.
- Property owners allege trustees gave preferential treatment to a company linked to two controversial nightclubs operating in the building.
- The court declined to place the body corporate under administration for now but said that option could be revisited if further evidence emerges.
Allegations of unpaid debts, preferential treatment and conflicts of interest at a Maboneng sectional title scheme have prompted the High Court in Johannesburg to order an independent investigation into the affairs of the Living Moad body corporate.
Infinity IP (Pty) Ltd and sectional owners Lynn Adelle Superina, Dayne George Muller and Nasir Sheik Habibullah Hassan approached the court seeking intervention in the affairs of the Body Corporate of Living Moad. They alleged that Laudefield (Pty) Ltd, which owns units and operates two nightclubs on the property, received favourable treatment while other owners were left to bear the consequences.
The applicants claimed that the trustees failed to act against Laudefield despite concerns about outstanding debts, alleged breaches of the rules, and the impact of the nightclub's operations on residents and tenants. According to the applicants, some tenants terminated their leases and moved out because of disturbances linked to the venues.
Court rejects body corporate's defence
The respondents argued that disputes concerning money allegedly owed by Laudefield had already been dealt with through a Community Schemes Ombud Service adjudication. Judge SDJ Wilson rejected that defence.
Judge Wilson found that the earlier ruling did not prevent the applicants from seeking relief under the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act. The judge also criticised the quality of the adjudicator's reasoning. The court said the earlier decision was "devoid of the reasons necessary to link the parties' submissions to the adjudicator's conclusion."
Judge Wilson found it would be unfair to prevent the applicants from pursuing their concerns through the courts.
Investigation ordered
The central question before the court was whether sufficient grounds existed to appoint a curator ad litem to investigate the affairs of the body corporate.
The applicants alleged that Laudefield enjoyed unusually favourable treatment, including payment arrangements that may not have been in the interests of the body corporate. They also questioned whether trustees had properly discharged their duties when dealing with the company and its activities within the development.
After considering the evidence, Judge Wilson found there was enough to justify an independent investigation. The judge said there were prima facie indications that Laudefield may not have paid everything it owed, may have received unusually favourable payment terms and may have been permitted to operate in a manner that breached applicable rules.
Judge Wilson remarked, "It is enough, I think, that I be satisfied that asking the curator ad litem to investigate the issue would be justified… I am so satisfied."
Attorney Charles Beckenstrater has been appointed as provisional curator ad litem. He will investigate whether trustees acted contrary to the interests of the body corporate, whether they breached fiduciary duties, whether certain appointments and decisions were lawful, and whether the management of the scheme unfairly benefited Laudefield at the expense of other owners.
Administration bid fails for now
The applicants also asked the court to appoint an administrator to take control of the body corporate's affairs. Judge Wilson declined that request.
The judge described such an appointment as a "drastic power" and found that the evidence did not establish the level of serious financial or administrative mismanagement required by law.
Judge Wilson held that the curator's investigation should be allowed to proceed before more intrusive measures are considered. However, the court warned that if evidence later emerges showing obstruction of the investigation or more serious governance failures, an application for administration could be revived.
Construction halted pending report
The court also barred Laudefield from carrying out further construction work at the property unless it obtains written approval from the City of Johannesburg.
The curator has been directed to report back to the court within two months. The findings could determine whether further legal action is taken against the trustees, Laudefield or other parties involved in managing the scheme.
Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.
