Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Judge finds four RAF claims shared troubling similarities, rejects settlement agreements

July 7, 2026

Constitutional Court declares Refugees Act asylum provisions unconstitutional

July 7, 2026

JSC recommendation to appoint Mpumalanga judge set aside by Supreme Court of Appeal

July 7, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Judge finds four RAF claims shared troubling similarities, rejects settlement agreements
  • Constitutional Court declares Refugees Act asylum provisions unconstitutional
  • JSC recommendation to appoint Mpumalanga judge set aside by Supreme Court of Appeal
  • Trustees clamp down on Airbnb rentals pending owners’ final decision at February AGM
  • Madibeng water case transferred to Pretoria in jurisdiction setback for Magalies Water
  • Justice Minister redraws High Court jurisdiction boundaries in major legal overhaul
  • Changing your matrimonial regime is a court process, not a braai discussion
  • Family may finally pursue answers into woman’s death following hospital treatment
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Madibeng water case transferred to Pretoria in jurisdiction setback for Magalies Water
Civil Law

Madibeng water case transferred to Pretoria in jurisdiction setback for Magalies Water

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJuly 7, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
The North West Division transferred Magalies Water's long-running dispute with Madibeng Local Municipality to the Gauteng Division after ruling it lacked territorial jurisdiction. Picture: Magalies Water/Facebook
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Magalies Water's claim against Madibeng Local Municipality will proceed in the Gauteng Division.
  • Despite years of litigation, the North West Division ruled that it did not have jurisdiction.
  • Recent changes to High Court boundaries do not apply because of transitional provisions.

A seven-year legal battle between Magalies Water and Madibeng Local Municipality will now continue in the High Court in Pretoria after the High Court in the North West ruled that it did not have the authority to hear the matter.

The ruling means the parties do not have to restart the entire case, but the trial will continue in a different court despite years of preparation in the High Court in the North West in Mahikeng.

Magalies Water instituted the action in 2019, seeking payment for operating and maintaining the bulk water infrastructure owned by Madibeng Local Municipality. The case had already progressed through pleadings, discovery, several procedural hearings and numerous pre-trial conferences before the court itself raised the issue of jurisdiction.

In the High Court in the North West, Acting Deputy Judge President AH Petersen said, "Jurisdiction is foundational... Neither consent, acquiescence, nor considerations of convenience can confer jurisdiction where the law withholds it."

Arguments on jurisdiction

Magalies Water argued that Madibeng should fall within the High Court in the North West's jurisdiction, relying on government notices and changes to magisterial districts. It also argued that, by defending the case for almost seven years, the municipality had effectively accepted the court's jurisdiction.

The municipality maintained that the relevant notices issued under the Superior Courts Act continued to place Madibeng within the High Court in Pretoria's jurisdiction and that simply participating in the litigation could not change this. The court agreed after considering the legislative framework.

Judge Petersen found that while Justice Minister Mmamaloko Kubayi intended in 2017 to move Madibeng into the High Court in the North West area, the proposal never became law. The 2018 notice did not transfer the municipality, meaning Madibeng remained within the Gauteng Division.

The court also found that the reorganisation of magisterial districts in 2025 did not automatically change High Court boundaries because the Magistrates' Courts Act and the Superior Courts Act serve different purposes.

Recent changes and court findings

While the court was preparing its judgment, Kubayi issued a new determination under the Superior Courts Act, effective from 1 July 2026. The determination places most of Madibeng within the jurisdiction of the High Court in the North West.

However, the court found that the new determination specifically provides that matters already enrolled for trial must continue under the previous jurisdictional arrangements.

Judge Petersen said, "This action... falls squarely within that provision. It must accordingly be concluded under the previous dispensation."

Magalies Water also failed to persuade the court that the municipality had submitted to the North West Division's jurisdiction through its conduct during the litigation.

Although the municipality entered an appearance to defend, filed pleadings, participated in discovery, attended pre-trial conferences and allowed the matter to proceed for years, the court held that this was not enough to establish a clear waiver of its legal rights. Judge Petersen said, "Waiver is never presumed."

The court found that the municipality's conduct was equally consistent with both parties mistakenly believing that the case had been instituted in the correct court.

Transfer of the case

Instead of dismissing the action, Judge Petersen decided that transferring the matter would best serve the interests of justice.

The court noted that the litigation has been ongoing since 2019, with all major pre-trial processes completed and the case ready for trial. Requiring Magalies Water to start over would unnecessarily increase costs and further delay the resolution of the dispute.

The High Court in the North West declared that it lacked territorial jurisdiction, ordered that the matter be transferred to the High Court in Pretoria, directed the registrars of both divisions to facilitate the transfer of the court file, and ordered that the costs of the jurisdiction dispute be costs in the main action.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

bulk water services Gauteng Division High Court Madibeng Local Municipality Magalies Water North West Division Superior Courts Act territorial jurisdiction
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Judge finds four RAF claims shared troubling similarities, rejects settlement agreements

July 7, 2026

Justice Minister redraws High Court jurisdiction boundaries in major legal overhaul

July 7, 2026

Family may finally pursue answers into woman’s death following hospital treatment

July 6, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 2   +   3   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Civil Law
5 Mins Read

Judge finds four RAF claims shared troubling similarities, rejects settlement agreements

By Kennedy MudzuliJuly 7, 20265 Mins Read

Judge J Fisher refused to enforce four RAF settlement agreements after finding delayed claims, defective evidence and no valid compromise between the parties.

Constitutional Court declares Refugees Act asylum provisions unconstitutional

July 7, 2026

JSC recommendation to appoint Mpumalanga judge set aside by Supreme Court of Appeal

July 7, 2026

Trustees clamp down on Airbnb rentals pending owners’ final decision at February AGM

July 7, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

CSOS voids body corporate’s decision refusing homeowner permission to install garden gate

June 30, 2026

Trustees clamp down on Airbnb rentals pending owners’ final decision at February AGM

July 7, 2026

Interpreter warns of deep impact as deaf student fights for sign language access

March 16, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by