- South Africa is seeing a sharp rise in inheritance disputes and urgent court applications when a married person dies without a Will.
- A considerable number of South Africans mistakenly assume that the surviving spouse automatically inherits everything.
- Intestate succession continues to produce outcomes that families never expected, often leading to conflict and litigation.
South Africa is seeing a sharp rise in inheritance disputes and urgent court applications when a married person dies without a Will, a trend that is placing families under intense financial and emotional pressure.
A considerable number of South Africans mistakenly assume that the surviving spouse automatically inherits everything. In reality, there is a strict formula applied in accordance with the Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987 that often produces outcomes families never expected.
There has been a marked increase in urgent applications, interdicts and full-blown litigation in the last few months because there was no valid Will. Families are being blindsided at a time when they should be supporting one another.
Intestate estates are becoming contested
Citing several recent High Court matters that illustrate how intestate estates can spiral into disputes, often within days of a death, the discussion starts with a contested parental claim.
In Jacobs NO and Another v Adams and Another (2025), the court had to decide whether or not a biological father qualified as a parent for inheritance purposes. The court found that he did not, because he had not played a meaningful parental role.
The ruling confirms that heirship is not a simple matter of biology and that intestate estates often require courts to determine who legally counts as family.
Peteke v Khumalo and Others (2025) placed the validity of a customary marriage at the centre of the dispute. The surviving partner sought urgent relief to stop the deceased’s family from taking control of assets while the marriage’s validity was still being challenged. This shows how the marital status itself can become a battleground when no Will exists to clarify the deceased’s intentions.
Tshali and Another v Nandi and Others (2025) involved a contested customary adoption and competing claims to inheritance. The court had to determine who qualified as a descendant under both customary law and the Intestate Succession Act and how modern family structures, customary law and statutory succession rules collide in intestate estates.
These cases reflect a clear pattern. When there is no Will, the law steps in with a one-size-fits-all formula, and families often end up in court trying to prove who counts as a spouse, a parent or a descendant.
Surviving spouses remain exposed
Under the Intestate Succession Act, a surviving spouse is entitled to R250 000 or a child’s share, whichever is greater. But this does not guarantee financial security.
Spouses can end up inheriting far less than expected, especially where the estate is small, the deceased had children from previous relationships, the marital home is the only significant asset, or the estate is asset rich but cash poor.
The biggest misconception is that marriage automatically protects the surviving spouse. It does not. The law protects the estate, not the relationship.
Marital property determines outcomes
Before intestate rules even apply, the couple’s marital property system must be understood. This is where many families discover that the law treats marriages very differently.
In community of property, the joint estate is divided in half; only the deceased’s 50% share is distributed, and the surviving spouse automatically keeps their half.
Out of community of property (without accrual), each spouse owns a separate estate and only the deceased’s assets are distributed.
Out of community of property (with accrual), the spouse with the smaller estate may have an accrual claim, and this claim is settled before intestate distribution begins.
These distinctions are not technicalities. They determine whether the surviving spouse keeps the home, receives a meaningful inheritance, or is left financially exposed.
Estate disputes are increasing
Of particular concern is the noticeable increase in the following: disputes between spouses and adult children over the value of the child’s share; pressure to sell the marital home to create liquidity; challenges to executor appointments; allegations of exclusion or mismanagement; delays at the Master’s Office due to objections and competing claims; and blended family disputes where children from previous relationships feel sidelined.
More families are in crisis because of the uncertainty created by intestate estates, and uncertainty breeds conflict. Urgent applications are escalating. The number of spouses rushing to court to stop assets being removed is rising, and so are instances of bank accounts being frozen and family members taking control of estates. These situations are traumatic and yet entirely avoidable.
Estate planning is essential
Married couples, particularly those in blended families or customary marriages, need to review their wills after major life events such as marriage, divorce, the birth of a child, or the purchase of property and understand their marital property regime.
Intestate succession is a blunt instrument. A valid, updated ill is the only way to ensure that a spouse and children are protected according to one’s wishes, not according to a statutory formula. The cost of drafting a will is negligible compared to the emotional and financial cost of litigation.
Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.
