The Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg has issued an interim relief order in a contentious dispute between the Witwatersrand African Taxi Association (WATA) and its rival, Nancefield Dube West Taxi Association (NANDUWE).
The case stems from a January decision by the Gauteng Provincial Regulatory Entity that sought to strip WATA members of their right to operate on several taxi routes, significantly intensifying an already volatile competition between the two associations.
WATA, representing over 700 taxi owners predominantly working within Soweto, argued that the Gauteng Provincial Regulatory Entity’s decision was made without providing any rationale, thereby violating the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act. The legislation stipulates that administrative decisions must be justified, failing which they are presumed to lack validity.
On 16 January 2025, WATA received a notification from Gauteng Provincial Regulatory Entity granting operational authority on disputed routes to NANDUWE, with immediate effect enforceable 21 days after notification. The sudden alteration in operational control prompted immediate action from Nanduwe, who began blocking WATA's access to these routes.
The conflict between WATA and Nanduwe dates back several years, marked by periodic tensions over route allocations and market share. At the heart of the judgment by Judge SD Wilson was the absence of a coherent justification from the Gauteng Provincial Regulatory Entity regarding their decision.
The judge highlighted that the decision appeared to contravene existing court orders intended to facilitate a resolution between WATA and NANDUWE through arbitration. Notably, the court had previously mandated that the ongoing disputes between the two associations be referred to arbitration scheduled for April 2025.
During the court proceedings, it became evident that the Gauteng Provincial Regulatory Entity had not only failed to provide the required reasons for its action but also responded inadequately to complaints from WATA regarding harassment from NANDUWE. Instead of addressing these grievances, the Gauteng Provincial Regulatory Entity enforced a blanket exclusion of WATA members from the contested routes.
Judge Wilson expressed that WATA had a strong case for the interim relief they sought. WATA members with valid operating licenses were reportedly suffering financially as a result of the implementation of the decision, which not only curtailed their income but also complicated their legal rights to an arbitration process as previously mandated by the court.
"This ruling affects our daily survival," said Thomas Mokgethi, a WATA operator for 15 years. "We've invested everything in our vehicles and licenses, only to face sudden route restrictions without explanation."
The judge's order interdicts the Gauteng Provincial Regulatory Entity and NANDUWE from enforcing the January decision and allows WATA members holding valid licenses to resume operations on the affected routes. It further instructed the South African Police Services and the Johannesburg Metro Police Department to enforce this order effectively.
#Conviction
