Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

SARS authorised to sell five Sandown properties linked to Shauwn Mkhize in R125.9m tax case

October 26, 2026

FSCA fines Johannes du Plessis R4.1m and bars him from financial services for 25 years

October 26, 2026

SA Post Office arbitration muddled by fake AI-generated legal case

October 26, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • SARS authorised to sell five Sandown properties linked to Shauwn Mkhize in R125.9m tax case
  • FSCA fines Johannes du Plessis R4.1m and bars him from financial services for 25 years
  • SA Post Office arbitration muddled by fake AI-generated legal case
  • Energy company faces costs order for flawed challenge to rival’s renewable energy project
  • Univen vice-chancellor’s bid to block suspension fails because earlier order protects him
  • Bestmed ordered to reinstate member after unjustified medical aid cancellation
  • Grace Bible Church gathers political leaders for prayer, urges acceptance of 4 November results
  • Africa’s first Pride march changed history; its message still matters today
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Victory for working mothers as Labour Court slams employer for pregnancy discrimination
Labour Law

Victory for working mothers as Labour Court slams employer for pregnancy discrimination

Induradec ordered to pay R724,086 after unlawfully placing pregnant employee on unpaid leave
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliMay 21, 2025Updated:May 21, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Durban Labour Court has found that Induradec Coatings (Pty) Ltd unlawfully discriminated against an employee by placing her on unpaid maternity leave.  

Judge K Allen-Yaman awarded Tiisetso Kefilwe Daisy Moleme compensation amounting to R724,086, equivalent to 11 months' salary, after determining that Induradec had failed to explore reasonable workplace accommodations as required under South African labour law. 

Moleme informed her employer of her pregnancy in March 2023, citing concerns about exposure to hazardous chemicals in the workplace. While Induradec initially agreed to move her out of the laboratory, she was left without work-related duties in a temporary office.  

The court highlighted that under the Basic Conditions of Employment Act and Employment Equity Act, employers are legally required to offer alternative work arrangements to pregnant employees when health risks are present. 

Despite medical recommendations that an Occupational Health and Safety evaluation be conducted to assess the feasibility of Moleme continuing her employment, Induradec opted to place her on unpaid leave from 16 May 2023, citing a lack of available work. The court ruled that the company had failed to conduct the necessary risk assessment, thereby violating its legal obligations. 

Employer’s oversight deemed discriminatory 

During the trial, evidence revealed that although Induradec based its decision on a health safety advisory, it failed to investigate whether Moleme’s work conditions could be adjusted to ensure her safety. The judge determined that this oversight constituted unfair discrimination based on pregnancy, reinforcing the importance of workplace compliance with maternity protections. 

#Conviction

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel     

employee protections Employment Equity Act Induradec Coatings labour court ruling legal victory maternity leave rights occupational health and safety pregnancy discrimination South Africa employment law Unfair dismissal workplace fairness
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

SA Post Office arbitration muddled by fake AI-generated legal case

October 26, 2026

Energy company faces costs order for flawed challenge to rival’s renewable energy project

October 26, 2026

Univen vice-chancellor’s bid to block suspension fails because earlier order protects him

October 26, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 9   +   9   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Money & Security
6 Mins Read

SARS authorised to sell five Sandown properties linked to Shauwn Mkhize in R125.9m tax case

By Kennedy MudzuliOctober 26, 20266 Mins Read

The High Court in Durban has authorised SARS to sell five Sandown properties linked to Shauwn Mkhize, with proceeds held in trust pending further proceedings.

FSCA fines Johannes du Plessis R4.1m and bars him from financial services for 25 years

October 26, 2026

SA Post Office arbitration muddled by fake AI-generated legal case

October 26, 2026

Energy company faces costs order for flawed challenge to rival’s renewable energy project

October 26, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

LPC warns against unregulated legal services, clarifies legal consultant ruling

October 17, 2026

The R400,000 award for ‘white trash’ and ‘dumb people’ insults that cost a woman her home

October 21, 2026

SARU HR manager’s feud with boss escalated from grievance to dismissal

October 23, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by