Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Gauteng’s cancellation of R200 million hospital gas contract declared unlawful

September 17, 2026

Employee sought medical advice not to be vaccinated for COVID-19, but still got fired

September 17, 2026

Constitutional Court orders Parliament to restart procurement law after public participation failure

September 17, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Gauteng’s cancellation of R200 million hospital gas contract declared unlawful
  • Employee sought medical advice not to be vaccinated for COVID-19, but still got fired
  • Constitutional Court orders Parliament to restart procurement law after public participation failure
  • Smoke breaks do not become authorised because supervisors know about them
  • Divorcing mother secures R48,000 monthly support for three children facing homelessness
  • University loses urgent bid to stop dental technology suspension process
  • The Hottest Hairstyle at Fashion Week Is Not on the Runways
  • Day 3 of Spring 2016 New York Fashion Week’s most inspiring
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » High Court awards R1 million RAF compensation to widow using past payslips
Civil Law

High Court awards R1 million RAF compensation to widow using past payslips

Self-employed crash victim’s family secures loss of support payout after court rejects RAF objections.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 17, 2025Updated:September 17, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • The Mpumalanga High Court ordered the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to pay R1,078,409 plus interest to a Zimbabwean widow and her three children, following a fatal 2021 car crash near Barberton.
  • Despite the deceased being self-employed at the time of his death, the court accepted actuarial loss calculations based on payslips from his previous formal job, dismissing the RAF’s attempt to avoid liability.
  • The RAF must also cover all legal and expert costs, with the court emphasising fairness for families facing unemployment and socio-economic challenges.

In a landmark decision, the Mpumalanga High Court in Mbombela ordered the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to pay a Zimbabwean widow and her three children over R1 million for loss of support following her husband’s death in a 2021 head-on collision near Barberton.

Judge A Ngwenya found that although the deceased was self-employed at the time of the accident, his income could not be conclusively proven. Instead, the court accepted actuarial calculations based on payslips from his previous employment at a forestry company, where he earned between R9,000 and R14,000 per month between 2016 and 2018.

No evidence to counter the widow’s account

The RAF argued that the widow had not proven her late husband’s income, and that testimony from a friend, combined with the lack of invoices, made the alleged R15,000 monthly earnings speculative. The fund further claimed that past payslips should not count because the deceased was no longer formally employed. However, Judge Ngwenya ruled that the RAF had not called any witnesses to counter the widow’s evidence or to challenge the claim that the accident was caused by the insured truck driver’s negligence.

Relying on guidance from the Quantum Yearbook, the court found actuarial reliance on the deceased’s last known income reasonable, especially in cases involving the self-employed or unemployed.

The court also adopted the actuary’s recommended contingency deductions: 5% for past loss and 10% (widow) and 5% (children) for future loss. Judge Ngwenya emphasised that unemployment should not be held against the claimant, especially given the high unemployment rate and socio-economic struggles in South Africa.

The RAF is required to pay R1 078,409 in damages plus interest, along with all legal and expert costs, including those of actuary Dr JJC Sauer. The widow’s testimony highlighted that her husband provided between R3 000 and R4 000 per month to support the family, leaving them financially vulnerable after his death.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.  

Legal News Loss of Support Motor Vehicle Accidents Mpumalanga High Court Road Accident Fund compensation
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Constitutional Court closes the door on RAF bid to exclude undocumented accident victims

September 16, 2026

Shopper fails to prove Makro liable for R1 million claim linked to fall outside Alberton store

September 15, 2026

High Court sets out how judges must calculate RAF pain and suffering claims

September 14, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 2   +   7   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Constitutional Law
4 Mins Read

Gauteng’s cancellation of R200 million hospital gas contract declared unlawful

By Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 17, 20264 Mins Read

Gauteng unlawfully cancelled a long-term gas infrastructure agreement designed to modernise heating systems at 10 public hospitals.

Employee sought medical advice not to be vaccinated for COVID-19, but still got fired

September 17, 2026

Constitutional Court orders Parliament to restart procurement law after public participation failure

September 17, 2026

Smoke breaks do not become authorised because supervisors know about them

September 17, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

Sea Point building plans declared unlawful, but luxury apartment development will continue

September 9, 2026

ConCourt rules KZN government has the final say on removing traditional leaders

September 11, 2026

Mugg & Bean franchise fired waitress, then used alleged racist remark to justify it

September 11, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by