Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Unfair dismissal in South Africa: What the law says, and where things go wrong

June 5, 2026

High Court rules Bitcoin is both money and capital under SA’s exchange control laws

June 5, 2026

Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert

June 5, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Unfair dismissal in South Africa: What the law says, and where things go wrong
  • High Court rules Bitcoin is both money and capital under SA’s exchange control laws
  • Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert
  • Municipality cannot reopen a case settled by a binding plea and sanction agreement
  • FSCA imposes R5.39 million in penalties on financial services firms
  • Wits student wins leave to appeal refusal to renew 2026 registration
  • Africa Day celebrations and the enduring gendered contradictions of African unity
  • Businesses urged to make only provable advertising claims
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » High Court awards R1 million RAF compensation to widow using past payslips
Civil Law

High Court awards R1 million RAF compensation to widow using past payslips

Self-employed crash victim’s family secures loss of support payout after court rejects RAF objections.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 17, 2025Updated:September 17, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • The Mpumalanga High Court ordered the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to pay R1,078,409 plus interest to a Zimbabwean widow and her three children, following a fatal 2021 car crash near Barberton.
  • Despite the deceased being self-employed at the time of his death, the court accepted actuarial loss calculations based on payslips from his previous formal job, dismissing the RAF’s attempt to avoid liability.
  • The RAF must also cover all legal and expert costs, with the court emphasising fairness for families facing unemployment and socio-economic challenges.

In a landmark decision, the Mpumalanga High Court in Mbombela ordered the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to pay a Zimbabwean widow and her three children over R1 million for loss of support following her husband’s death in a 2021 head-on collision near Barberton.

Judge A Ngwenya found that although the deceased was self-employed at the time of the accident, his income could not be conclusively proven. Instead, the court accepted actuarial calculations based on payslips from his previous employment at a forestry company, where he earned between R9,000 and R14,000 per month between 2016 and 2018.

No evidence to counter the widow’s account

The RAF argued that the widow had not proven her late husband’s income, and that testimony from a friend, combined with the lack of invoices, made the alleged R15,000 monthly earnings speculative. The fund further claimed that past payslips should not count because the deceased was no longer formally employed. However, Judge Ngwenya ruled that the RAF had not called any witnesses to counter the widow’s evidence or to challenge the claim that the accident was caused by the insured truck driver’s negligence.

Relying on guidance from the Quantum Yearbook, the court found actuarial reliance on the deceased’s last known income reasonable, especially in cases involving the self-employed or unemployed.

The court also adopted the actuary’s recommended contingency deductions: 5% for past loss and 10% (widow) and 5% (children) for future loss. Judge Ngwenya emphasised that unemployment should not be held against the claimant, especially given the high unemployment rate and socio-economic struggles in South Africa.

The RAF is required to pay R1 078,409 in damages plus interest, along with all legal and expert costs, including those of actuary Dr JJC Sauer. The widow’s testimony highlighted that her husband provided between R3 000 and R4 000 per month to support the family, leaving them financially vulnerable after his death.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.  

Legal News Loss of Support Motor Vehicle Accidents Mpumalanga High Court Road Accident Fund compensation
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert

June 5, 2026

Toddler’s future forever changed after an accident just before his third birthday

June 4, 2026

Sportscene lawyers ordered to pay costs after appeal delayed by flawed court record

June 2, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 4   +   10   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Employment and Labour Law Series
7 Mins Read

Unfair dismissal in South Africa: What the law says, and where things go wrong

By Ann-Suhet MarxJune 5, 20267 Mins Read

Unfair dismissal is one of the most common workplace disputes in South Africa. Understanding the rules can help both employees and employers avoid costly mistakes.

High Court rules Bitcoin is both money and capital under SA’s exchange control laws

June 5, 2026

Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert

June 5, 2026

Municipality cannot reopen a case settled by a binding plea and sanction agreement

June 5, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Agricultural advisors declared scientists in landmark Labour Court ruling

February 17, 2026

R13,914 debt triggers sale of R380 000 home, transfer halted amid execution flaws

April 20, 2026

Understanding employee rights, workplace protections and grievance resolution in South Africa

June 8, 2025
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by