Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up

October 15, 2026

Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’

October 15, 2026

Lease, R228 million tender and assassination plots in Matlala’s mounting legal battles

October 15, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up
  • Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’
  • Lease, R228 million tender and assassination plots in Matlala’s mounting legal battles
  • Elections analyst surprised but not shocked by ANC ballot ruling, Terry Tselane defends IEC
  • Fraud conviction set aside due to unregistered candidate attorney’s role in trial
  • Moepya commits IEC to ANC ballot changes and pledges review of nomination rules
  • Body corporate loses execution order after summons went missing in its own building
  • Malawi court blocks Bushiris’ extradition to SA, citing evidentiary and procedural defects
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Sanlam fined R10.6 million over weak client checks after FSCA uncovers anti-money laundering failures
Regulatory Law

Sanlam fined R10.6 million over weak client checks after FSCA uncovers anti-money laundering failures

Repeat offenses and poor controls put South Africa’s financial system at risk, regulator says.
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterOctober 14, 2025Updated:October 14, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • FSCA: Sanlam’s anti-money laundering program failed to prevent real-world risks.
  • Critical gaps: multiple clients and their beneficial owners are not properly screened or verified.
  • R3.6 million suspended, but only if Sanlam shows full compliance after repeated failures.

Sanlam has been fined R10.6 million by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) for not following South Africa’s anti-money laundering laws.

The FSCA states that Sanlam Collective Investments (SCI) had systems in place for checking clients and spotting risky transactions that were either missing or not functioning correctly, leaving room for financial crime. “Sanlam had a risk program on paper,” the FSCA said, “but it wasn’t used properly. It didn’t perform its intended role.”

An inspection in March 2024 showed that SCI’s internal controls were weak and technically flawed. The FSCA found that SCI had not established proper procedures to review large or unusual transactions, end risky business relationships, or report suspicious activity. Even basic client checks were insufficient. Some clients and their beneficial owners had not been properly identified or verified, and the firm did not provide extra scrutiny for politically exposed persons.

“Proper due diligence is not optional,” the FSCA warned. “It’s how we keep criminals out of the financial system.” The regulator emphasized that SCI’s failures were not just technical; they posed a real risk to South Africa’s financial sector.

Repeat offenses and conditional leniency

This is not the first time SCI has faced trouble. The FSCA took previous violations into account, including a formal agreement SCI had to sign under the Financial Sector Regulation Act and a past penalty for violating the rules of the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act. These repeat offenses made the current R10.6 million penalty even more serious.

Still, the FSCA recognised that SCI has begun to address the problems. Because of this, R3.6 million of the fine will be suspended for two years, on the condition that SCI fully corrects its mistakes and remains compliant. If it makes another mistake, the suspended amount will be reinstated.

Sector-wide warning from the regulator

The FSCA made it clear that this penalty serves as a warning to the entire financial sector. “We will not tolerate non-compliance,” the regulator said. “All financial institutions must regularly review their systems and take anti-money laundering seriously.”

Institutions connected to international financial groups, like SCI, are expected to exercise even more caution. The FSCA stated that SCI’s size and complexity mean it has greater responsibility, and weak controls at this level put the entire financial system at risk.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

 

anti-money laundering client due diligence financial sector compliance FSCA Sanlam fined R10.6 million
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

Related Posts

FSCA warns public about Telegram investment scams and fake refund claims

October 14, 2026

Member seeks to use pension savings to finish family home, but fund refuses loan

October 1, 2026

OUTsurance told Cape Town motorists pointsmen were ‘on your route’ despite no service there

September 29, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 1   +   1   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Opinion
9 Mins Read

SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up

By Sikhander CoopooOctober 15, 20269 Mins Read

On 6 October 2026, the Equality Court in Gqeberha handed down a judgment that many…

Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’

October 15, 2026

Lease, R228 million tender and assassination plots in Matlala’s mounting legal battles

October 15, 2026

Elections analyst surprised but not shocked by ANC ballot ruling, Terry Tselane defends IEC

October 15, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

APRAV welcomes new RAF boss and rejects Road Accident Benefit Scheme revival plan

October 9, 2026

Business owner ordered to pay R200,000 for banning LGBTQ+ people from his shop

October 11, 2026

Tenant who withheld R1.4 million in rent, citing maintenance failures, ordered to leave property

October 13, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by