Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Archbishop Tutu’s former home named global headquarters in fight against hunger

May 16, 2026

South Africa’s labour law landscape: What employees and employers need to know

May 15, 2026

Tourism businesses near South Africa’s national parks call for stronger support

May 15, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Archbishop Tutu’s former home named global headquarters in fight against hunger
  • South Africa’s labour law landscape: What employees and employers need to know
  • Tourism businesses near South Africa’s national parks call for stronger support
  • Three-year waiting period for attorneys to appear in higher courts declared unconstitutional
  • Father told to pay daughter’s university fees despite maintenance dispute
  • Man faces criminal charge for allegedly accusing another person of witchcraft
  • Community scheme conduct rules submitted without body corporate approval ruled invalid
  • Who does not work for white supremacist capitalism, asks Sandile Memela
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Makate injustice: Please call me later and the long road of legal battles against the big boys
Opinion

Makate injustice: Please call me later and the long road of legal battles against the big boys

Siyabonga Hadebe on how years of legal battles drained Makate and revealed the harsh realities of corporate power in South Africa.
Siyabonga HadebeBy Siyabonga HadebeNovember 6, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Inventor of Please Call Me, Nkosana Kenneth Makate. Picture: Screengrab
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Large corporations use legal processes to exhaust less-resourced opponents, R13m legal bill forced Makate to settle.
  • South Africa risks failing to recognise talent and reward innovation, 17 years of litigation for Makate shows systemic issues.
  • Precedent warns individuals against challenging big corporations; justice delayed often equals justice denied.

Large multinationals dislike being taken to court, so this announcement was quite expected. When issues of justice and human dignity arise, they generally prefer to settle out of court.

The recent court outcome, where the court imposed an R13 million legal bill, may have had something to do with forcing the expensive Nkosana Makate to sign.

This corporate strategy is quite simple and straightforward, if companies agree to go to court they "weaponise" legal processes to drain the complainant. In terms of this practice, a larger or wealthier entity uses the legal process itself to exhaust an opponent (often a less-resourced individual or small entity). This tactic is often referred to as litigation abuse or using scorched-earth litigation tactics.

When justice is weaponised against the weak

The case of Mankayi v AngloGold Ashanti Ltd in 2011 is a good example to illustrate the point. Although, this case opened the door for thousands of mineworkers to pursue class-action lawsuits against mining companies, Thembekile Mankayi died before the case was settled out of court.

Makate was lucky to see some "justice" while still alive. The undisclosed settlement, rumoured around R400 million, is neither a win nor justice given that Makate has been drained by over 17 years of litigation and stress. Imagine if he'd gotten the R400 million, say 15 years ago, there may have been better things happening in tech innovation in South Africa. Justice delayed is justice denied!

Instead of rejoicing, people should be concerned about two things. First, South Africa may not be the place that recognises talent and reward innovation. With over 62 % unemployment, there is a reason to be worried. Second, it is important to recognise that the law may not be about justice but a terrain for the rich. The Makate case illustrates this travesty.

A precedent has been set again: never try to take on the Big Boys! Anyone who dares challenge big corporations must either face legal violence like Messrs Makate and Mankayi or deathly violence like the ex-Lonmin workers in Marikana.

Siy yi banga le economy!

Conviction.co.za 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

corporate justice innovation litigation abuse Nkosana Makate South Africa Vodacom
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Siyabonga Hadebe
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)

Independent commentator on socioeconomic, political and global matters based in Geneva, Switzerland.

Related Posts

Who does not work for white supremacist capitalism, asks Sandile Memela

May 14, 2026

Selection without substance in SAPS leadership interviews and fast car to nowhere

May 13, 2026

‘Abahambe’ and international labour political economy: Cycles of exploitation since the 1800s

May 12, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 0   +   10   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Special Reports
5 Mins Read

Archbishop Tutu’s former home named global headquarters in fight against hunger

By Mashudu SadikeMay 16, 20265 Mins Read

Archbishop Desmond Tutu’s former Soweto home has been named the global headquarters of an anti-hunger programme backed by a R1.54 million Rotary grant.

South Africa’s labour law landscape: What employees and employers need to know

May 15, 2026

Tourism businesses near South Africa’s national parks call for stronger support

May 15, 2026

Three-year waiting period for attorneys to appear in higher courts declared unconstitutional

May 15, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
Our Picks

Archbishop Tutu’s former home named global headquarters in fight against hunger

May 16, 2026

South Africa’s labour law landscape: What employees and employers need to know

May 15, 2026

Tourism businesses near South Africa’s national parks call for stronger support

May 15, 2026
Most Popular

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by