Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Children and girlfriend awarded R3.5m pension payout while estranged wife receives nothing

May 28, 2026

Employers must treat retirement contributions like wages, says MIBCO’s Paulos Masemola

May 28, 2026

Legal Indaba 2026 to confront AI, ethics and accountability in South Africa’s legal profession

May 28, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Children and girlfriend awarded R3.5m pension payout while estranged wife receives nothing
  • Employers must treat retirement contributions like wages, says MIBCO’s Paulos Masemola
  • Legal Indaba 2026 to confront AI, ethics and accountability in South Africa’s legal profession
  • Nelson Mandela University secures interdict against an employee’s racism allegations
  • South Africa’s wage employment trap stifles innovation and creativity
  • NSFAS whistleblower wins reinstatement after Labour Court finds dismissal was retaliation
  • Taxi driver awarded R1.17 million after police assault left him with fractured leg
  • Solar registration warning as homeowners face costly compliance risks
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Children and girlfriend awarded R3.5m pension payout while estranged wife receives nothing
Regulatory Law

Children and girlfriend awarded R3.5m pension payout while estranged wife receives nothing

Tribunal ruling highlights how pension funds prioritise proven financial dependency when distributing death benefits.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliMay 28, 2026Updated:May 28, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • A provident fund paid out a R3.5 million death benefit to the deceased’s children and girlfriend after confirming they depended on him financially.
  • The deceased’s estranged wife received nothing as she could not prove he supported her financially.
  • The Financial Services Tribunal confirmed that pension funds must distribute death benefits in accordance with proven dependency and fairness, as required by the Pension Funds Act.

The children and girlfriend of a deceased provident fund member have secured the full benefit of a R3.5 million pension payout after the Financial Services Tribunal upheld a decision excluding the man’s estranged wife from any share of the money.

The ruling centred on the death of Isack Bafana Ndlangamandla, whose provident fund benefit amounted to R3 521 416.44 after tax.

Following an investigation into his dependents, the Becsa Provident Fund distributed the money among his children and girlfriend after concluding that they were financially dependent on him at the time of his death.

His daughter Nokuthula Marcia Ndlangamandla received 15% of the benefit, while Thembelihle Mzila and Slindile Mlangeni each received 22.5%. Mafate Mabule received 25%, and the deceased’s girlfriend, Nhlanhla Ndlovu, received 15%.

Nomsa Esther Ndlangamandla, the deceased’s estranged wife, was excluded entirely from the allocation despite arguing that she remained financially dependent on him. She later challenged the decision before the Pension Funds Adjudicator and then the Financial Services Tribunal.

Why the children and girlfriend qualified

The case turned on one central issue. The fund had to determine who could prove actual financial dependency on the deceased.

The fund told the tribunal that the deceased’s girlfriend had lived with him from June 2022 until his death and had provided bank statements showing financial support from him.

The fund accepted that they shared a household and household responsibilities, which qualified her as a factual dependant under the Pension Funds Act. The children were also recognised as dependants entitled to benefit from the allocation.

By contrast, Ndlangamandla told the tribunal that although she and the deceased did not live together, he supported her with groceries and cash payments and that she would visit him on weekends or during periods when she was off work.

However, she could not provide bank statements or other documentary evidence of ongoing financial support from the deceased. That absence of evidence proved fatal to her challenge.

The tribunal accepted that the marriage between Ndlangamandla and the deceased had been validly registered posthumously, but found that marriage alone did not automatically entitle a person to receive a share of a pension death benefit.

Dependency outweighs relationship labels

The tribunal explained that pension funds are required by section 37C of the Pension Funds Act to investigate all dependents and distribute benefits in a manner considered fair and equitable.

This means trustees must look beyond labels such as wife, husband, girlfriend, boyfriend, or nominee and instead examine actual financial dependency.

In its ruling, the tribunal said, “The Fund is enjoined to investigate and ensure an equitable allocation of a death benefit to dependents.”

The tribunal also said, “The factors to be considered by the Fund are those that exist and are apparent when the discretion is to be exercised.”

Among the factors pension funds must consider are the relationship with the deceased, age of dependants, extent of dependency, future earning potential, and the amount available for distribution.

The tribunal found that the fund properly considered relevant information and exercised its discretion lawfully when allocating the benefit to the children and the girlfriend.

“In the absence of any proof of dependency by the Applicant, the Fund could not come to any other allocation decision,” the tribunal said.

The application for reconsideration was dismissed, leaving the allocation of the R3.5 million death benefit unchanged.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Dependency claims Financial Services Tribunal Pension death benefit payout Pension Funds Act provident fund
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Employers must treat retirement contributions like wages, says MIBCO’s Paulos Masemola

May 28, 2026

Municipal Employees Pension Fund ordered to release two-pot savings despite arrears dispute

May 27, 2026

Court rejects government’s effort to stop private Foot and Mouth Disease vaccinations

May 26, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 5   +   3   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Regulatory Law
4 Mins Read

Children and girlfriend awarded R3.5m pension payout while estranged wife receives nothing

By Kennedy MudzuliMay 28, 20264 Mins Read

Children and a girlfriend received the full benefit of a R3.5 million provident fund payout after a tribunal found they were financially dependent on the deceased, while his estranged wife was excluded for failing to prove dependency.

Employers must treat retirement contributions like wages, says MIBCO’s Paulos Masemola

May 28, 2026

Legal Indaba 2026 to confront AI, ethics and accountability in South Africa’s legal profession

May 28, 2026

Nelson Mandela University secures interdict against an employee’s racism allegations

May 28, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Online marketplace scams are becoming more sophisticated, warns fraud expert Ashwini Singh

May 26, 2026

Children with disabilities experience barriers when trying to report abuse and seek support

May 25, 2026

Understanding employee rights, workplace protections and grievance resolution in South Africa

June 8, 2025
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by