Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Mothers considering adoption have rights to privacy, dignity and legal support

June 15, 2026

Father gets suspended jail sentence for prioritising business interests over maintenance

June 15, 2026

Ekurhuleni faces looming deadline to rebuild homes at N12 settlement

June 15, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Mothers considering adoption have rights to privacy, dignity and legal support
  • Father gets suspended jail sentence for prioritising business interests over maintenance
  • Ekurhuleni faces looming deadline to rebuild homes at N12 settlement
  • Homeowner’s challenge to FSCA decision fails as tribunal finds no direct benefit for him
  • Municipality worker says he was underpaid for three years, wins right to pursue claim
  • UP graduate links obstetric violence against black women to failures in maternal healthcare
  • From newsroom deadlines to the Bar, Rorisang Kgosana pursues a higher calling
  • Sexual harassment at work: Employer duties, liability and the rights of employees
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Father gets suspended jail sentence for prioritising business interests over maintenance
Family Law

Father gets suspended jail sentence for prioritising business interests over maintenance

Father gets suspended jail sentence after failing to pay R210 000 maintenance and prioritising business interests.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJune 15, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • A father was found in contempt of court after failing to pay R210 000 in maintenance for his wife and two children.
  • The court rejected his claim that he could not afford the payments after evidence showed he funded businesses linked to him.
  • He received a suspended 90-day prison sentence and was ordered to pay the outstanding maintenance.

A father involved in ongoing divorce proceedings has been found in contempt of court for failing to pay maintenance for his wife and two minor children, even as he continued to advance large sums to businesses linked to him.

Judge T Ndita of the High Court in the Western Cape found that the father’s explanation that he could not afford the monthly maintenance payments was not supported by the evidence. The court ruled that he had deliberately failed to comply with a maintenance order requiring him to pay R42 000 per month.

The father was sentenced to 90 days in prison, suspended until the divorce proceedings are finalised, provided he settles the outstanding maintenance and follows future court orders.

Maintenance arrears kept increasing

The couple, who are currently divorcing, have two minor children. In June 2023, a court ordered the father to pay R42 000 per month in maintenance.

In the years that followed, the father made several attempts to have the maintenance amount reduced, arguing that his financial situation had changed and he could no longer afford the payments. Each of these applications was dismissed by the courts.

Eventually, the father stopped paying maintenance altogether. By December 2025, he owed R210 000 in arrears. Although he later paid R200 000 through his attorneys, the court found that this did not excuse his earlier failure to comply with the maintenance order.

Court dismisses claim of financial hardship

The mother told the court that the father still had access to significant financial resources while maintenance remained unpaid.

Evidence showed that he had substantial credit available during the period when he was not paying maintenance. The court also heard that he loaned R375 000, obtained through a credit facility, to a property company where he served as a director, even while he was behind on maintenance payments.

Judge Ndita found that this behaviour undermined the father’s claim that he couldn’t afford to support his family.

The judge remarked, “It is difficult to understand the Respondent’s decision to loan Vikla R375 000 from his credit card when he knew, or should have known, that his maintenance obligations were already in arrears.”

The court also found that the father had advanced money to other businesses while neglecting his maintenance obligations. Judge Ndita added, “After all, the maintenance of his minor children should, all things being fair, even without a court order, be his priority.”

Children’s needs come first

The court found that the father’s claims of financial difficulty were not backed by a full disclosure of the finances of businesses and entities under his control.

Judge Ndita said, “The Respondent’s claims of being in financial difficulties are unconvincing and, to me, seem contrived, given that he readily loaned substantial amounts to other entities while neglecting his maintenance obligations.”

The judge concluded that the father’s failure to pay maintenance was deliberate and in bad faith.

Judge Ndita said, “A finding of willfulness and mala fides is inescapable. Contempt has therefore been established beyond reasonable doubt.”

Suspended prison sentence

The court ordered the father to pay the outstanding R136 000 within 20 days and to strictly comply with the maintenance order in future. If he fails to do so, the mother can return to court and seek enforcement of the suspended prison sentence.

In closing, Judge Ndita found that the father’s explanation for not being able to afford the maintenance payments did not meet the legal standard.

The judge said, “The respondent’s explanation that he cannot afford his maintenance obligations falls short of the standard required to prove lack of willfulness or bad faith.”

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

contempt of court Divorce family law Maintenance Western Cape High Court
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Phumeza Shoba loses maintenance claim after court finds distorted picture of her finances

June 12, 2026

Intimidating parent ordered to remain 100 metres from Hendrik Louw Primary School

June 12, 2026

Large animal client connections at heart of Mossel Bay vet’s restraint of trade drama

June 11, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 8   +   1   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Ask The Expert
3 Mins Read

Mothers considering adoption have rights to privacy, dignity and legal support

By Conviction Staff ReporterJune 15, 20263 Mins Read

Women considering adoption are entitled to privacy, dignity and legal support. The Women’s Legal Centre explains the protections available throughout the adoption process.

Father gets suspended jail sentence for prioritising business interests over maintenance

June 15, 2026

Ekurhuleni faces looming deadline to rebuild homes at N12 settlement

June 15, 2026

Homeowner’s challenge to FSCA decision fails as tribunal finds no direct benefit for him

June 15, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Agricultural advisors declared scientists in landmark Labour Court ruling

February 17, 2026

Standard Bank should have investigated mental health concerns before dismissal, CCMA finds

June 10, 2026

Labour Court confirms strict limits on legal representation at the CCMA proceedings

June 8, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by