The High Court’s Western Cape Division is set to determine if the City of Cape Town could be held liable for the life-altering accident of Rashied Abrahams, who became paraplegic following a debilitating motor vehicle collision on the M5 Kromboom Parkway, which transpired on the night of 16 July 2010.
The court proceedings will explore intricate details about road safety, municipal responsibilities, and the consequences of alleged negligence that left Abrahams with catastrophic injuries.
During proceedings that began on 27 January 2025, Abrahams's counsel presented evidence arguing that the City had failed to maintain the roadway’s drainage system, which purportedly caused water to pool on the road and led to a loss of control of his vehicle. According to the Abrahams, the City had a legal obligation to ensure the road was safe for drivers. Testimonies outlined various eyewitness accounts, including those from brave bystanders, emergency responders, and accident reconstruction experts. The evidence painted a harrowing picture of water pooling on the roadway at the juncture of the Klipfontein on-ramp and Kromboom Road off-ramp, where the accident occurred.
Road completely engulfed by water
Court testimony revealed alarming details encountered during the harrowing moment of the accident, with multiple witnesses describing the scene as one where water completely engulfed the road. Bronwyn Andrea Witbooi, a passenger in a tow truck who witnessed the accident unfold, recalled a “big splash of water” as Abrahams’s car lost control and crashed into a tree. “It was one big dam,” she recounted, a sentiment echoed by responding emergency personnel and police officer, who indicated the extent of water that left both lanes of the road nearly submerged.
Municipal representatives, however, countered the claims, asserting that they had fulfilled their maintenance obligations and that factors such as Abrahams's alleged reckless driving and failure to wear a seatbelt also significantly contributed to the accident. The City's counsel argued against the claim at the closing of the plaintiff's case, requesting that the court exhibit “absolution from the instance,” citing insufficient evidence from Abrahams’s side.
In his judgment, the court found weighty implications in the evidence presented by expert witness Roodt, who testified regarding the road's design flaws that contributed to dangerous conditions for drivers, notably the failure of adequate drainage that could lead to aquaplaning during rainfall. Roodt posited that effective stormwater management was crucial and that the accumulation of water could create unexpected hazards, highlighting that negligent road maintenance leads to situations that pose grave risks to drivers.
The court further examined the role of the environment, including vegetation that might have obstructed water flow and contributed to the hazardous conditions of the roadway, calling into question the City's long-standing practices regarding road maintenance and inspections. The testimony and cross-examinations revealed areas where the City may have neglected responsible oversight of the roadway.
#Conviction
Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.
