Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

SARS authorised to sell five Sandown properties linked to Shauwn Mkhize in R125.9m tax case

October 26, 2026

FSCA fines Johannes du Plessis R4.1m and bars him from financial services for 25 years

October 26, 2026

SA Post Office arbitration muddled by fake AI-generated legal case

October 26, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • SARS authorised to sell five Sandown properties linked to Shauwn Mkhize in R125.9m tax case
  • FSCA fines Johannes du Plessis R4.1m and bars him from financial services for 25 years
  • SA Post Office arbitration muddled by fake AI-generated legal case
  • Energy company faces costs order for flawed challenge to rival’s renewable energy project
  • Univen vice-chancellor’s bid to block suspension fails because earlier order protects him
  • Bestmed ordered to reinstate member after unjustified medical aid cancellation
  • Grace Bible Church gathers political leaders for prayer, urges acceptance of 4 November results
  • Africa’s first Pride march changed history; its message still matters today
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Checkers Sixty60 misled consumers with its ‘anywhere’ delivery promise
Regulatory Law

Checkers Sixty60 misled consumers with its ‘anywhere’ delivery promise

The ARB finds that a West Coast delivery claim created a misleading impression, even though the helicopter depiction was clearly fictional.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliMarch 20, 2026Updated:March 20, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Checkers Sixty60 advert has been found misleading after ARB rules ‘anywhere’ delivery claim creates false impression of West Coast coverage.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • The ARB found the Checkers Sixty60 advert misleading for suggesting delivery anywhere along the West Coast.
  • The Directorate ruled that helicopter delivery scenes were clearly fictional and not misleading.
  • The complaint was upheld because the advert created a misleading impression of actual service coverage.

A Checkers Sixty60 advertisement has been found to breach the Code of Advertising Practice after the Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) ruled that its “anywhere” delivery message gives consumers a false impression of how far the service actually reaches along the West Coast.

The complaint stemmed from a TikTok advertisement published by Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd to promote its Sixty60 delivery service. In the video, a floating house sits on turquoise water “somewhere on the West Coast”, where a group of people place a grocery order through the app and have it delivered by helicopter.

A consumer from St Helena Bay lodged a complaint, pointing out that Sixty60 does not, in fact, deliver to the West Coast, and certainly not by helicopter.

Shoprite Checkers pushed back, saying the advertisement is part of its “Summer Delivered” campaign and relies on creative expression. The company described the helicopter and ocean setting as “a metaphorical storytelling device” and argued that the phrase “Summer delivered anywhere” is figurative and intended to evoke a feeling, not make a literal promise about delivery coverage.

ARB proceeds despite jurisdiction challenge by non-member advertiser

Shoprite Checkers also challenged whether the ARB had any authority over it at all, arguing that as a non-member, it falls outside the board’s jurisdiction.

The Directorate clarified its position by pointing to its Memorandum of Incorporation, which makes clear that while the ARB cannot bind non-members, it can still rule on any advertisement, regardless of who published it, for the guidance of its own members.

This position has been confirmed by the Supreme Court of Appeal. The Directorate pressed on and considered the complaint on that basis.

Helicopter delivery depiction found to be fantastical and not misleading

The Directorate assessed whether the advertisement was misleading under Clause 4.2.1 of Section II of the Code.

On the helicopter delivery specifically, the Directorate found the advertisement to be “overtly stylised and fantastical.” It reminded that advertising must be assessed as a whole, and that the benchmark is a reasonable consumer who is “neither hypercritical nor oversensitive.”

The Directorate held that the helicopter depiction was “so far removed from ordinary grocery delivery… that its use in the advertisement is clearly hyperbolic.”

The Directorate also looked at public reaction to the ad, noting that comments largely showed viewers did not take the helicopter delivery at face value. It concluded that the commercial would not lead a reasonable consumer to believe Sixty60 actually delivers groceries by helicopter to offshore locations.

“Anywhere” and West Coast messaging found to mislead

The “anywhere” claim, however, was a different story. The Directorate turned its attention to the phrases “Somewhere on the West Coast” and “Summer delivered. Anywhere.”

Unlike the helicopter, these statements were found to communicate a promise about where Sixty60 delivers. The Directorate found that “the advertisement communicates that any reasonable West Coast destination would be possible.”

The Directorate confirmed that St Helena Bay, the complainant’s area, is not serviced by Sixty60. That gap between what the ad implies and where the service actually reaches was enough to create a misleading impression.

It concluded, “The advertisement is likely to mislead the hypothetical reasonable consumer into believing that the Advertiser offers delivery ‘anywhere’ along the West Coast.”

ARB upholds the complaint and instructs members to pull the ad

The Directorate found the advertisement in breach of Clause 4.2.1 of Section II of the Code, which prohibits advertising that is likely to mislead consumers through ambiguity, exaggeration, or implication.

The complaint was upheld. ARB members were instructed not to accept the advertisement in any form that includes the claims “Somewhere on the West Coast” or “Summer delivered. Anywhere.”

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Advertising Regulatory Board Checkers Sixty60 Consumer complaint delivery services Misleading Advertising
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Energy company faces costs order for flawed challenge to rival’s renewable energy project

October 26, 2026

Univen vice-chancellor’s bid to block suspension fails because earlier order protects him

October 26, 2026

Bestmed ordered to reinstate member after unjustified medical aid cancellation

October 26, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 0   +   2   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Money & Security
6 Mins Read

SARS authorised to sell five Sandown properties linked to Shauwn Mkhize in R125.9m tax case

By Kennedy MudzuliOctober 26, 20266 Mins Read

The High Court in Durban has authorised SARS to sell five Sandown properties linked to Shauwn Mkhize, with proceeds held in trust pending further proceedings.

FSCA fines Johannes du Plessis R4.1m and bars him from financial services for 25 years

October 26, 2026

SA Post Office arbitration muddled by fake AI-generated legal case

October 26, 2026

Energy company faces costs order for flawed challenge to rival’s renewable energy project

October 26, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

LPC warns against unregulated legal services, clarifies legal consultant ruling

October 17, 2026

The R400,000 award for ‘white trash’ and ‘dumb people’ insults that cost a woman her home

October 21, 2026

SARU HR manager’s feud with boss escalated from grievance to dismissal

October 23, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by