Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Wife wins R90,000 interim maintenance order, with court citing marital lifestyle

May 13, 2026

Family wins eviction battle after disputed estate sale of Bellville home

May 13, 2026

Girl born in prison at centre of emotional custody fight involving incarcerated mother

May 13, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Wife wins R90,000 interim maintenance order, with court citing marital lifestyle
  • Family wins eviction battle after disputed estate sale of Bellville home
  • Girl born in prison at centre of emotional custody fight involving incarcerated mother
  • ‘Abahambe’ and international labour political economy: Cycles of exploitation since the 1800s
  • Courts send strong warning to litigants who deliberately ignore binding court orders
  • Constitutional Court backs Home Affairs crackdown on repeat asylum claims
  • Makate accuses his former litigation funders of fraud in a dramatic new High Court battle
  • Fake Bonang Matheba and Idols SA winner Karabo calls used to lure women into rape trap
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Checkers Sixty60 misled consumers with its ‘anywhere’ delivery promise
Regulatory Law

Checkers Sixty60 misled consumers with its ‘anywhere’ delivery promise

The ARB finds that a West Coast delivery claim created a misleading impression, even though the helicopter depiction was clearly fictional.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliMarch 20, 2026Updated:March 20, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Checkers Sixty60 advert has been found misleading after ARB rules ‘anywhere’ delivery claim creates false impression of West Coast coverage.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • The ARB found the Checkers Sixty60 advert misleading for suggesting delivery anywhere along the West Coast.
  • The Directorate ruled that helicopter delivery scenes were clearly fictional and not misleading.
  • The complaint was upheld because the advert created a misleading impression of actual service coverage.

A Checkers Sixty60 advertisement has been found to breach the Code of Advertising Practice after the Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) ruled that its “anywhere” delivery message gives consumers a false impression of how far the service actually reaches along the West Coast.

The complaint stemmed from a TikTok advertisement published by Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd to promote its Sixty60 delivery service. In the video, a floating house sits on turquoise water “somewhere on the West Coast”, where a group of people place a grocery order through the app and have it delivered by helicopter.

A consumer from St Helena Bay lodged a complaint, pointing out that Sixty60 does not, in fact, deliver to the West Coast, and certainly not by helicopter.

Shoprite Checkers pushed back, saying the advertisement is part of its “Summer Delivered” campaign and relies on creative expression. The company described the helicopter and ocean setting as “a metaphorical storytelling device” and argued that the phrase “Summer delivered anywhere” is figurative and intended to evoke a feeling, not make a literal promise about delivery coverage.

ARB proceeds despite jurisdiction challenge by non-member advertiser

Shoprite Checkers also challenged whether the ARB had any authority over it at all, arguing that as a non-member, it falls outside the board’s jurisdiction.

The Directorate clarified its position by pointing to its Memorandum of Incorporation, which makes clear that while the ARB cannot bind non-members, it can still rule on any advertisement, regardless of who published it, for the guidance of its own members.

This position has been confirmed by the Supreme Court of Appeal. The Directorate pressed on and considered the complaint on that basis.

Helicopter delivery depiction found to be fantastical and not misleading

The Directorate assessed whether the advertisement was misleading under Clause 4.2.1 of Section II of the Code.

On the helicopter delivery specifically, the Directorate found the advertisement to be “overtly stylised and fantastical.” It reminded that advertising must be assessed as a whole, and that the benchmark is a reasonable consumer who is “neither hypercritical nor oversensitive.”

The Directorate held that the helicopter depiction was “so far removed from ordinary grocery delivery… that its use in the advertisement is clearly hyperbolic.”

The Directorate also looked at public reaction to the ad, noting that comments largely showed viewers did not take the helicopter delivery at face value. It concluded that the commercial would not lead a reasonable consumer to believe Sixty60 actually delivers groceries by helicopter to offshore locations.

“Anywhere” and West Coast messaging found to mislead

The “anywhere” claim, however, was a different story. The Directorate turned its attention to the phrases “Somewhere on the West Coast” and “Summer delivered. Anywhere.”

Unlike the helicopter, these statements were found to communicate a promise about where Sixty60 delivers. The Directorate found that “the advertisement communicates that any reasonable West Coast destination would be possible.”

The Directorate confirmed that St Helena Bay, the complainant’s area, is not serviced by Sixty60. That gap between what the ad implies and where the service actually reaches was enough to create a misleading impression.

It concluded, “The advertisement is likely to mislead the hypothetical reasonable consumer into believing that the Advertiser offers delivery ‘anywhere’ along the West Coast.”

ARB upholds the complaint and instructs members to pull the ad

The Directorate found the advertisement in breach of Clause 4.2.1 of Section II of the Code, which prohibits advertising that is likely to mislead consumers through ambiguity, exaggeration, or implication.

The complaint was upheld. ARB members were instructed not to accept the advertisement in any form that includes the claims “Somewhere on the West Coast” or “Summer delivered. Anywhere.”

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Clickhere to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Advertising Regulatory Board Checkers Sixty60 Consumer complaint delivery services Misleading Advertising
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Nine years of neglect leaves grieving mother waiting for son’s pension death benefit

    May 12, 2026

    Webber Wentzel candidate attorney policy survives legal challenge

    May 11, 2026

    Deadline approaching for comments on proposed POPIA rules for gated estates and buildings

    May 11, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 1   +   10   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Family Law
    4 Mins Read

    Wife wins R90,000 interim maintenance order, with court citing marital lifestyle

    By Kennedy MudzuliMay 13, 20264 Mins Read

    A judge ordered a businessman to pay his estranged wife more than R90,000 a month in interim maintenance, ruling that the family should continue living in a manner broadly consistent with their marital lifestyle.

    Family wins eviction battle after disputed estate sale of Bellville home

    May 13, 2026

    Girl born in prison at centre of emotional custody fight involving incarcerated mother

    May 13, 2026

    ‘Abahambe’ and international labour political economy: Cycles of exploitation since the 1800s

    May 12, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Wife wins R90,000 interim maintenance order, with court citing marital lifestyle

    May 13, 2026

    Family wins eviction battle after disputed estate sale of Bellville home

    May 13, 2026

    Girl born in prison at centre of emotional custody fight involving incarcerated mother

    May 13, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.