Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint

February 8, 2026

Lower-paid workers must take unpaid salary cases to the CCMA first, not Labour Court

February 7, 2026

Fund ordered to repay member after fees erase unclaimed R1 069 benefit

February 7, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint
  • Lower-paid workers must take unpaid salary cases to the CCMA first, not Labour Court
  • Fund ordered to repay member after fees erase unclaimed R1 069 benefit
  • R1.4 million levy claim fails as High Court blocks sequestration of R2.5 million property
  • Employer ordered to pay R354 000 to driver left unpaid for three years after reinstatement
  • Anele Mda must apologise to Mbalula after court dismisses defamation appeal
  • Magistrate wrong to punish Legal Aid Lawyer for speaking isiXhosa during court proceedings
  • Dry taps, fragile municipal systems: exposing failures of resilience
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Court rebukes City of Johannesburg, declares 300% school rate hikes unconstitutional
Law & Justice

Court rebukes City of Johannesburg, declares 300% school rate hikes unconstitutional

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliApril 10, 2025Updated:April 10, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Gauteng High Court has ruled against the City of Johannesburg's 2023/2024 Rates Policy, declaring the classification of privately-owned educational properties as "business and commercial" unconstitutional. 

The court found that the City's new categorisation system removed the independent "education" category previously enjoyed by educational properties, resulting in devastating financial consequences. Some institutions reported facing up to 300% increases in their annual municipal rates, threatening their financial sustainability and potentially forcing significant fee increases for parents. 

Judge J Mudau determined that the municipality had conducted a "sham process" leading to the decision, thereby failing in its constitutional obligations. "Public participation should not be merely formalistic; it necessitates genuine engagement," he remarked in the ruling. 

The court articulated that Section 28 of the Constitution, which mandates that a child's best interests be of paramount importance, had been neglected in the decision-making process. In assessing the public participation process, Judge Mudau noted that the City had neglected essential community involvement and failed to provide adequate responses to queries raised by stakeholders. 

The legal challenge

The High Court's ruling stemmed from the consolidation of four separate applications challenging the City's recently implemented Rates Policy. Notable applicants included The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd and Advtech Ltd, who brought the application in their own interest, in the interest of children enrolled at their schools, and in the public interest. 

AfriForum NPC brought its application in its own interest, the interests of its members, and the public interest, while Curro Holdings, a public company with limited liability duly registered in South Africa, The Independent Schools Association Southern Africa NPC (ISASA), the oldest and largest association of independent schools in Southern Africa, representing 847 member schools in South Africa, was also part of the case. 

Additional applicants in the ISASA application included Sparrow Schools Educational Trust (a non-profit independent school serving learners with special educational needs from economically disadvantaged communities), Bellavista School NPC (an independent remedial school serving 270 learners with special needs), and Citykidz Pre and Primary School (a non-profit independent state-subsidised school serving lower-income families in the Johannesburg CBD). 

Different legal approaches

Three of the applicants (except Curro) contended that the City was entitled to create a specific "education" category in which their properties must be allocated, and that the City's failure to do so tainted the whole process with irrationality. 

Curro took a slightly different approach, arguing that meaningful engagement with stakeholders was needed to address the question of categorisation of independent schools and the rates to be levied, which did not materialise. Curro sought a review of the impugned decisions as irrational, arbitrary and unreasonable, and requested an order directing the City to consult and undertake the necessary public participation process before categorising independent schools. 

Curro also sought an order declaring the differentiation between public and independent schools for the purpose of levying property rates an impermissible differentiation under section 19(1)(c) of the Local Government: Municipal Property Rates Act ("MPRA"). 

The City's defence rejected

The City of Johannesburg contended that the reviews were rendered moot as the new Rates Policy took effect on July 1, 2023. However, the court dismissed this argument, stating that concerns regarding the legality of the 2023/2024 policy remained live and required immediate judicial consideration to prevent ongoing financial and organisational harm to educational institutions. 

The court ordered the City to repeal the impugned provisions of the Rates By-Law and Policy that pertained to all educational institutions. Furthermore, it mandated that the municipality revisit its procedures, ensure genuine community involvement, and consider inputs from affected institutions before adopting any revised policy. 

#Conviction

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Constitutional case law South Africa Educational institution tax ruling Educational property classification Educational tax burden Gauteng education crisis Human Rights Judge J Mudau ruling legal aid Municipal bylaw constitutionality Private school operating costs Property rates legislation MPRA Public participation requirements municipalities Rate increases independent schools School financial sustainability School property rates judgment Section 28 Constitution children's rights South African municipal governance
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint

    February 8, 2026

    Lower-paid workers must take unpaid salary cases to the CCMA first, not Labour Court

    February 7, 2026

    Fund ordered to repay member after fees erase unclaimed R1 069 benefit

    February 7, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 3   +   8   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Regulatory Law
    3 Mins Read

    Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint

    By Kennedy MudzuliFebruary 8, 20263 Mins Read

    South Africa’s advertising watchdog has dismissed a consumer complaint against Swing Daddy’s cheeky golf apparel posts, ruling that the cartoon sexual innuendo is humorous, not explicit, and unlikely to cause serious offence or harm children.

    Lower-paid workers must take unpaid salary cases to the CCMA first, not Labour Court

    February 7, 2026

    Fund ordered to repay member after fees erase unclaimed R1 069 benefit

    February 7, 2026

    R1.4 million levy claim fails as High Court blocks sequestration of R2.5 million property

    February 6, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint

    February 8, 2026

    Lower-paid workers must take unpaid salary cases to the CCMA first, not Labour Court

    February 7, 2026

    Fund ordered to repay member after fees erase unclaimed R1 069 benefit

    February 7, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.