Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students

July 26, 2026

Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises

July 25, 2026

African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children

July 25, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students
  • Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises
  • African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children
  • Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa
  • From rock samples to rocking the stage: Gavaza Mongwe advances to Mrs SA Top 30
  • Why the High Court sided with Ramaphosa in the Phala Phala impeachment battle
  • SCOPA chair Zibi says RAF’s declining performance triggered Parliament’s inquiry
  • D-day for law firm to repay R500 000 property deposit after holding money for nearly nine years
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Court rebukes City of Johannesburg, declares 300% school rate hikes unconstitutional
Law & Justice

Court rebukes City of Johannesburg, declares 300% school rate hikes unconstitutional

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliApril 10, 2025Updated:April 10, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Gauteng High Court has ruled against the City of Johannesburg's 2023/2024 Rates Policy, declaring the classification of privately-owned educational properties as "business and commercial" unconstitutional. 

The court found that the City's new categorisation system removed the independent "education" category previously enjoyed by educational properties, resulting in devastating financial consequences. Some institutions reported facing up to 300% increases in their annual municipal rates, threatening their financial sustainability and potentially forcing significant fee increases for parents. 

Judge J Mudau determined that the municipality had conducted a "sham process" leading to the decision, thereby failing in its constitutional obligations. "Public participation should not be merely formalistic; it necessitates genuine engagement," he remarked in the ruling. 

The court articulated that Section 28 of the Constitution, which mandates that a child's best interests be of paramount importance, had been neglected in the decision-making process. In assessing the public participation process, Judge Mudau noted that the City had neglected essential community involvement and failed to provide adequate responses to queries raised by stakeholders. 

The legal challenge 

The High Court's ruling stemmed from the consolidation of four separate applications challenging the City's recently implemented Rates Policy. Notable applicants included The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd and Advtech Ltd, who brought the application in their own interest, in the interest of children enrolled at their schools, and in the public interest. 

AfriForum NPC brought its application in its own interest, the interests of its members, and the public interest, while Curro Holdings, a public company with limited liability duly registered in South Africa, The Independent Schools Association Southern Africa NPC (ISASA), the oldest and largest association of independent schools in Southern Africa, representing 847 member schools in South Africa, was also part of the case. 

Additional applicants in the ISASA application included Sparrow Schools Educational Trust (a non-profit independent school serving learners with special educational needs from economically disadvantaged communities), Bellavista School NPC (an independent remedial school serving 270 learners with special needs), and Citykidz Pre and Primary School (a non-profit independent state-subsidised school serving lower-income families in the Johannesburg CBD). 

Different legal approaches 

Three of the applicants (except Curro) contended that the City was entitled to create a specific "education" category in which their properties must be allocated, and that the City's failure to do so tainted the whole process with irrationality. 

Curro took a slightly different approach, arguing that meaningful engagement with stakeholders was needed to address the question of categorisation of independent schools and the rates to be levied, which did not materialise. Curro sought a review of the impugned decisions as irrational, arbitrary and unreasonable, and requested an order directing the City to consult and undertake the necessary public participation process before categorising independent schools. 

Curro also sought an order declaring the differentiation between public and independent schools for the purpose of levying property rates an impermissible differentiation under section 19(1)(c) of the Local Government: Municipal Property Rates Act ("MPRA"). 

The City's defence rejected 

The City of Johannesburg contended that the reviews were rendered moot as the new Rates Policy took effect on July 1, 2023. However, the court dismissed this argument, stating that concerns regarding the legality of the 2023/2024 policy remained live and required immediate judicial consideration to prevent ongoing financial and organisational harm to educational institutions. 

The court ordered the City to repeal the impugned provisions of the Rates By-Law and Policy that pertained to all educational institutions. Furthermore, it mandated that the municipality revisit its procedures, ensure genuine community involvement, and consider inputs from affected institutions before adopting any revised policy. 

#Conviction

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Constitutional case law South Africa Educational institution tax ruling Educational property classification Educational tax burden Gauteng education crisis Human Rights Judge J Mudau ruling legal aid Municipal bylaw constitutionality Private school operating costs Property rates legislation MPRA Public participation requirements municipalities Rate increases independent schools School financial sustainability School property rates judgment Section 28 Constitution children's rights South African municipal governance
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises

July 25, 2026

African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children

July 25, 2026

Why the High Court sided with Ramaphosa in the Phala Phala impeachment battle

July 24, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 10   +   10   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Special Reports
3 Mins Read

Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students

By Conviction Staff ReporterJuly 26, 20263 Mins Read

The Unisa Law Clinic is inviting donations of quality pre-loved business attire to help LLB students prepare for interviews, court observations and practical legal training.

Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises

July 25, 2026

African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children

July 25, 2026

Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa

July 24, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

Labour Court stops municipal disciplinary hearing over AI citation concerns

July 22, 2026

Wedding rehearsal or workplace protest? Judge rules in favour of singing mineworkers

July 21, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by