Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

What it really costs to take a legal dispute to court in South Africa

September 12, 2026

Sectional title schemes explained: Is that parking bay really for you?

September 11, 2026

ConCourt rules KZN government has the final say on removing traditional leaders

September 11, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • What it really costs to take a legal dispute to court in South Africa
  • Sectional title schemes explained: Is that parking bay really for you?
  • ConCourt rules KZN government has the final say on removing traditional leaders
  • Sanlam fraud debarment overturned after hearing notice sent to wrong email address
  • Facebook Marketplace ‘Sganai’ scam syndicate gets life and 150 years behind bars
  • Judge blocks Absa-linked company from selling pensioner’s home
  • Mugg & Bean franchise fired waitress, then used alleged racist remark to justify it
  • Eviction law does not protect temporary homeless shelters from court-ordered eviction
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Justice delayed, lives denied: Court forces Gauteng to deliver radiation treatment
Constitutional Law

Justice delayed, lives denied: Court forces Gauteng to deliver radiation treatment

Ruling upholds cancer patients’ right to life, dignity and urgent healthcare 
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliAugust 22, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
The Gauteng High Court has ordered urgent enforcement of radiation backlog ruling, upholding cancer patients’ constitutional rights and demanding immediate government action. Picture: Cancer Alliance
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Thousands of patients trapped in backlog since 2022, many dying while waiting for radiation. 
  • Court rules that enforcement cannot be suspended pending appeal, confirming urgency. 
  • SECTION27 and Cancer Alliance call for immediate compliance by Gauteng Health Department. 

The South Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg has drawn a line between life and death. In a ruling that could save thousands, Judge EF Dippenaar declared that Gauteng cannot hide behind appeals while cancer patients waste away on waiting lists. With every day lost, tumours spread, families grieve, and dignity is stripped away. 

For over three years, more than 3 000 patients at Charlotte Maxeke and Steve Biko academic hospitals have been trapped in a growing backlog for radiation oncology treatment. Many have waited in vain, their conditions deteriorating beyond treatability. Some died before their names ever appeared on the “dynamic waiting list” the Department of Health in Gauteng relied on, which SECTION27 argued obscured the true scale of the crisis. 

Cancer Alliance, represented by SECTION27, returned to court on 5 August 2025 to prevent the enforcement of a March 2025 order from being suspended by the state’s appeal. That earlier ruling, granted by Acting Judge S van Nieuwenhuizen, had declared the department’s failure to develop and implement a plan to address the backlog unlawful and unconstitutional. It compelled the Gauteng Department of Health to update patient lists, provide radiation treatment in public or private facilities, and file progress reports with long-term plans. 

Life and death urgency confirmed 

Judge Dippenaar agreed that this was no ordinary case, stressing that the consequences of further delay were “irreversible and permanent.” The judgment recorded that some patients had already died while waiting, while others were denied care within the critical windows where radiation could have been effective. “To direct otherwise may well be the death knell for many vulnerable cancer patients… They do not have the luxury of time,” the judge wrote. 

The ruling means that paragraphs 5, 6, and 7 of Acting Judge Van Nieuwenhuizen’s March order will remain enforceable while appeals continue in higher courts. Judge Dippenaar noted that the respondents had taken no meaningful steps to comply in the months since the original order, and their opposition lacked substance or urgency. 

SECTION27 and Cancer Alliance welcomed the decision as a victory for constitutional rights and a call to action for government. They urged the Gauteng Department of Health, the Minister of Health, and hospital CEOs to stop using legal manoeuvres as delay tactics and instead prioritise the urgent treatment of those in desperate need. 

“Every day of inaction means more families losing loved ones unnecessarily,” the organisations warned. For patients who have waited too long, the judgment is more than a legal victory; it is a chance at life restored. 

Cancer Alliance statement: Raising voices for patients 

On its Facebook page, the Cancer Alliance described the ruling as a reaffirmation of government’s constitutional duty: “This victory is more than just a legal win; it reaffirms government’s Constitutional obligation to provide timely and dignified cancer care.  

“As cancer patients, many are not always able to fight for their rights while battling the disease. That is why the Cancer Alliance and cancer NGOs raise their voices on behalf of thousands of patients who are affected every single day.  

“We read their stories, we see their struggles, and we live their experiences. By sharing this powerful message, you empower patients to recognise, claim, and defend their rights to health and dignity. Together, we are building a movement that will not be silenced.” 

Conviction.co.za 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.      

Cancer Alliance Constitutional rights Gauteng Department of Health radiation oncology backlog SECTION27
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

ConCourt rules KZN government has the final say on removing traditional leaders

September 11, 2026

Electoral Court dismisses UDF Party application for more time to nominate candidates

September 8, 2026

Magistrates cannot order deportation of undocumented foreigners in South Africa

September 4, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 6   +   2   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Legal Aid
5 Mins Read

What it really costs to take a legal dispute to court in South Africa

By Conviction Staff ReporterSeptember 12, 20265 Mins Read

From attorney fees and advocate costs to court tariffs and taxation, here’s what every South African should know before taking a legal dispute to court.

Sectional title schemes explained: Is that parking bay really for you?

September 11, 2026

ConCourt rules KZN government has the final say on removing traditional leaders

September 11, 2026

Sanlam fraud debarment overturned after hearing notice sent to wrong email address

September 11, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

Lawyers ordered to pay from their own pockets after refusing to abandon hopeless appeal

September 9, 2026

Mugg & Bean franchise fired waitress, then used alleged racist remark to justify it

September 11, 2026

My soul is not happy: Sharpeville survivors take government to court over apartheid reparations

September 4, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by