Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

RAF challenges ruling protecting indigent claimants unable to pay medical costs upfront

October 16, 2026

SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up

October 15, 2026

Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’

October 15, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • RAF challenges ruling protecting indigent claimants unable to pay medical costs upfront
  • SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up
  • Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’
  • Lease, R228 million tender and assassination plots in Matlala’s mounting legal battles
  • Elections analyst surprised but not shocked by ANC ballot ruling, Terry Tselane defends IEC
  • Fraud conviction set aside due to unregistered candidate attorney’s role in trial
  • Moepya commits IEC to ANC ballot changes and pledges review of nomination rules
  • Body corporate loses execution order after summons went missing in its own building
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Justice Department ordered to promote five senior secretaries with back pay
Labour Law

Justice Department ordered to promote five senior secretaries with back pay

The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development has been ordered to promote five Johannesburg legal secretaries to salary Level 8 and pay retrospective back pay after an arbitrator ruled they were wrongly denied automatic grade progression.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 3, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Five senior secretaries have won an arbitration against the Department of Justice.
  • The ruling found that benchmarking did not replace their formal job evaluation at salary level 7.
  • The department must implement the promotions immediately and pay all back pay by 31 August 2026.

The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development must promote five senior secretaries to salary Level 8 after an arbitrator found they were wrongly denied automatic grade progression under Resolution 3 of 2009.

The dispute was brought by the Public Servants Association for five legal secretaries at the Office of the State Attorney in Johannesburg. The employees argued their posts were formally upgraded to salary Level 7 after a job evaluation in 2006 and that they had completed 15 years of continuous service with satisfactory performance ratings, making them eligible for progression from 1 April 2021.

The Department of Justice, supported by the Department of Public Service and Administration, opposed the claim. The departments said a 2006 benchmarking exercise had effectively placed the employees on salary Level 5, even though they continued to receive Level 7 pay, and that moving them to Level 8 would be an impermissible jump in salary.

Benchmarking was not enough

Arbitrator Marion Fouche rejected that argument, finding the departments had wrongly relied on benchmarking to deny the employees their progression rights. Arbitrator Fouche said “benchmarking and job grading are distinct tools in the workplace,” and that the benchmarking exercise could not replace a formal job evaluation.

The arbitrator found no evidence that the Department of Justice had changed the employees’ job descriptions or completed the formal regrading required to alter their post level. Simply telling the employees they were considered Level 5 was not enough to overturn their formally evaluated Level 7 posts.

Fouche also dismissed the department’s claim that the employees held “personal level” positions, finding there was no documentary evidence to support that.

Promotions and backpay

Having found the applicants remained on salary level 7, Fouche ruled they “qualify to grade progress to level 8 with effect from 1 April 2021.”

The Department of Justice was ordered to preserve the original job evaluation, immediately amend the employees’ personnel records, and promote all five secretaries to salary Level 8, effective from 1 April 2021.

The department must also pay each employee the first notch of Level 8, including all applicable increases and retrospective backpay from April 2021.

The award directs that all outstanding backpay be paid no later than 31 August 2026; any disputes over the amount may be referred back for quantification.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

arbitration grade progression Justice Department public service senior secretaries
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Studio 88 employee overcharged customer using till she had not been trained to operate

October 14, 2026

Department fails to prove project officer’s misconduct in farm allocation

October 14, 2026

Gautrain conductor could not justify refusal of mandatory COVID-19 vaccine, judge rules

October 13, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 2   +   6   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Constitutional Law
7 Mins Read

RAF challenges ruling protecting indigent claimants unable to pay medical costs upfront

By Kennedy MudzuliOctober 16, 20267 Mins Read

The Road Accident Fund is asking the Constitutional Court to overturn a ruling that allows interim medical payments for indigent accident victims unable to afford necessary treatment upfront.

SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up

October 15, 2026

Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’

October 15, 2026

Lease, R228 million tender and assassination plots in Matlala’s mounting legal battles

October 15, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

APRAV welcomes new RAF boss and rejects Road Accident Benefit Scheme revival plan

October 9, 2026

Business owner ordered to pay R200,000 for banning LGBTQ+ people from his shop

October 11, 2026

Tenant who withheld R1.4 million in rent, citing maintenance failures, ordered to leave property

October 13, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by