Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Hybrid work, surveillance software and the new boundary lines of employee privacy

July 31, 2026

World Ranger Day: Woman ranger reflects on the price of protecting nature in South Africa

July 31, 2026

Financial adviser acted dishonestly by using his own cellphone for client consent

July 31, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Hybrid work, surveillance software and the new boundary lines of employee privacy
  • World Ranger Day: Woman ranger reflects on the price of protecting nature in South Africa
  • Financial adviser acted dishonestly by using his own cellphone for client consent
  • High Court finds struck-off attorney acted unlawfully and calls for Hawks investigation
  • Government begins Angola mission to bring home remains of South African liberation fighters
  • North-West University barred from disciplining senior lecturer over PhD registration dispute
  • Municipality vindicated for disconnecting electricity linked to illegal development
  • How the State betrayed women by outsourcing public safety to private philanthropy
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Lives at stake: High Court demands action on Gauteng’s 3 000-patient cancer treatment crisis
Law & Justice

Lives at stake: High Court demands action on Gauteng’s 3 000-patient cancer treatment crisis

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliMarch 28, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Steve Biko Academic Hospital in Pretoria is one of the Gauteng hospitals affected by the cancer treatment ruling. Picture: X
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The High Court in Johannesburg has mandated the Gauteng Department of Health to act swiftly in addressing the alarming backlog of radiation oncology services that has left over 3,000 cancer patients in a distressing limbo.  

The court's decision comes as a beacon of hope amidst a prolonged healthcare crisis that has exacerbated the plight of those desperately waiting for critical life-saving treatments, particularly at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Steve Biko Academic Hospital in Pretoria.  

The motion was instigated by the Cancer Alliance, a patient advocacy group, which on 27 June 2024 called for emergency intervention to ensure the department complies with its constitutional duty to provide adequate healthcare.  

Documents presented during the proceedings revealed a staggering R784 million had been allocated by Gauteng Treasury in March 2023 specifically to address this crisis. Alarmingly, a significant portion of these funds, including R250 million earmarked for outsourcing radiation oncology services, has remained unutilised and subsequently returned to the Treasury, hampered by protracted procurement processes. 

Adding to the frustration, it was disclosed that while Siemens Healthcare was awarded a tender for radiation oncology planning services, it lacked the capability to deliver the immediate treatment desperately needed by backlog patients. This loophole has laid bare the ineffectiveness of the efforts made by health authorities to remedy the situation. 

The presiding Acting Judge Sarah van Nieuwenhuizen expressed severe dissatisfaction with the department’s conduct, stating: "The provincial health respondents have done nothing meaningful since the money was allocated... The health and general well-being of the cancer patients has significantly deteriorated. There is a clear, imminent and ongoing irreparable harm that cancer patients who are on the backlog list are suffering."

As part of the ruling, the Gauteng Department of Health has been ordered to formulate a comprehensive plan within 45 days to address the radiation oncology services backlog and refresh the patient waiting list. Additionally, the court has mandated submission of progress reports every three months to ensure ongoing accountability. 

While SECTION27 and Cancer Alliance have expressed their relief at this judgment, the fight for timely access to cancer care continues. They acknowledge that this ruling is a crucial step forward for thousands of patients and their families whose lives hinge on receiving these essential treatments. "We celebrate with the thousands of cancer patients and their families, whose lives will forever be changed by this groundbreaking judgment,” the organisations said in a statement.

#Conviction

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Cancer Alliance cancer treatment backlog Gauteng Department of Health healthcare crisis Johannesburg High Court oncology services patient advocacy patient waiting list radiation oncology radiation treatment delays SECTION27
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Financial adviser acted dishonestly by using his own cellphone for client consent

July 31, 2026

High Court finds struck-off attorney acted unlawfully and calls for Hawks investigation

July 31, 2026

Government begins Angola mission to bring home remains of South African liberation fighters

July 31, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 3   +   8   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Employment and Labour Law Series
4 Mins Read

Hybrid work, surveillance software and the new boundary lines of employee privacy

By Ann-Suhet MarxJuly 31, 20264 Mins Read

Ann-Suhet Marx examines how hybrid work is redefining employee privacy, workplace surveillance and employers’ legal obligations under South African law.

World Ranger Day: Woman ranger reflects on the price of protecting nature in South Africa

July 31, 2026

Financial adviser acted dishonestly by using his own cellphone for client consent

July 31, 2026

High Court finds struck-off attorney acted unlawfully and calls for Hawks investigation

July 31, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Legal Practice Council ordered to disclose records behind English-only admission exams

July 28, 2026

Labour Court halts UCT consultation process that could defeat pending whistleblower trial

July 28, 2026

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by