Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Legal Resources Centre tells SAHRC hunger crisis stems from exclusion, not food scarcity

March 15, 2026

Three reasons to steer clear of highly risky illegal offshore online gambling

March 14, 2026

#1 rated online school in South Africa? Advertising board says not so fast

March 14, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Legal Resources Centre tells SAHRC hunger crisis stems from exclusion, not food scarcity
  • Three reasons to steer clear of highly risky illegal offshore online gambling
  • #1 rated online school in South Africa? Advertising board says not so fast
  • Children come first! South African law is clear about parental responsibilities and maintenance
  • SANRAL and contractors liable for N1 aquaplaning crash caused by pooled water
  • Worker allowed to enforce R3.19 million award after 13-year legal battle with RCL Foods
  • Divorcing couple ordered to return furniture taken from matrimonial home
  • Familiarity with the Bench can breed mediocrity in legal practice and courtroom culture
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Lives at stake: High Court demands action on Gauteng’s 3 000-patient cancer treatment crisis
Law & Justice

Lives at stake: High Court demands action on Gauteng’s 3 000-patient cancer treatment crisis

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliMarch 28, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Steve Biko Academic Hospital in Pretoria is one of the Gauteng hospitals affected by the cancer treatment ruling. Picture: X
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The High Court in Johannesburg has mandated the Gauteng Department of Health to act swiftly in addressing the alarming backlog of radiation oncology services that has left over 3,000 cancer patients in a distressing limbo.  

The court's decision comes as a beacon of hope amidst a prolonged healthcare crisis that has exacerbated the plight of those desperately waiting for critical life-saving treatments, particularly at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Steve Biko Academic Hospital in Pretoria.  

The motion was instigated by the Cancer Alliance, a patient advocacy group, which on 27 June 2024 called for emergency intervention to ensure the department complies with its constitutional duty to provide adequate healthcare.  

Documents presented during the proceedings revealed a staggering R784 million had been allocated by Gauteng Treasury in March 2023 specifically to address this crisis. Alarmingly, a significant portion of these funds, including R250 million earmarked for outsourcing radiation oncology services, has remained unutilised and subsequently returned to the Treasury, hampered by protracted procurement processes. 

Adding to the frustration, it was disclosed that while Siemens Healthcare was awarded a tender for radiation oncology planning services, it lacked the capability to deliver the immediate treatment desperately needed by backlog patients. This loophole has laid bare the ineffectiveness of the efforts made by health authorities to remedy the situation. 

The presiding Acting Judge Sarah van Nieuwenhuizen expressed severe dissatisfaction with the department’s conduct, stating: "The provincial health respondents have done nothing meaningful since the money was allocated... The health and general well-being of the cancer patients has significantly deteriorated. There is a clear, imminent and ongoing irreparable harm that cancer patients who are on the backlog list are suffering."

As part of the ruling, the Gauteng Department of Health has been ordered to formulate a comprehensive plan within 45 days to address the radiation oncology services backlog and refresh the patient waiting list. Additionally, the court has mandated submission of progress reports every three months to ensure ongoing accountability. 

While SECTION27 and Cancer Alliance have expressed their relief at this judgment, the fight for timely access to cancer care continues. They acknowledge that this ruling is a crucial step forward for thousands of patients and their families whose lives hinge on receiving these essential treatments. "We celebrate with the thousands of cancer patients and their families, whose lives will forever be changed by this groundbreaking judgment,” the organisations said in a statement.

#Conviction

Get your news on the go. Click hereto follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Cancer Alliance cancer treatment backlog Gauteng Department of Health healthcare crisis Johannesburg High Court oncology services patient advocacy patient waiting list radiation oncology radiation treatment delays SECTION27
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Legal Resources Centre tells SAHRC hunger crisis stems from exclusion, not food scarcity

    March 15, 2026

    Three reasons to steer clear of highly risky illegal offshore online gambling

    March 14, 2026

    #1 rated online school in South Africa? Advertising board says not so fast

    March 14, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 4   +   7   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Human Rights
    4 Mins Read

    Legal Resources Centre tells SAHRC hunger crisis stems from exclusion, not food scarcity

    By Conviction Staff ReporterMarch 15, 20264 Mins Read

    The Legal Resources Centre tells the SAHRC inquiry that hunger in South Africa stems from exclusion from land and fishing resources undermining the constitutional right to food.

    Three reasons to steer clear of highly risky illegal offshore online gambling

    March 14, 2026

    #1 rated online school in South Africa? Advertising board says not so fast

    March 14, 2026

    Children come first! South African law is clear about parental responsibilities and maintenance

    March 13, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Legal Resources Centre tells SAHRC hunger crisis stems from exclusion, not food scarcity

    March 15, 2026

    Three reasons to steer clear of highly risky illegal offshore online gambling

    March 14, 2026

    #1 rated online school in South Africa? Advertising board says not so fast

    March 14, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.