Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Final ruling sends a clear message on misleading health claims after Heala.org sugar ad controversy

October 5, 2025

Home Affairs funeral policy fraud exposed as Calvinia official exploits the dead

October 4, 2025

FSCA flags unauthorised investment operators Skuriey.rsa, AMFX Solutions, Dazzle Brilliance Diamond

October 4, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Final ruling sends a clear message on misleading health claims after Heala.org sugar ad controversy
  • Home Affairs funeral policy fraud exposed as Calvinia official exploits the dead
  • FSCA flags unauthorised investment operators Skuriey.rsa, AMFX Solutions, Dazzle Brilliance Diamond
  • South Africa turns food waste talk into action as government, business, and communities embrace real change
  • Parental leave equality in South Africa achieved as ConCourt empowers all parents to share leave
  • Whistleblower turns the tables as police sergeant arrested for bribery in White River
  • Johannesburg High Court orders City Power to rebuild Alexandra homes after illegal demolitions
  • Tshwane residents finally receive justice after years of being overcharged
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Apartment owner forced to give up exclusive use of parking, storeroom and cupboard
Property Law

Apartment owner forced to give up exclusive use of parking, storeroom and cupboard

Western Cape High Court rules decades-old arrangement invalid, clarifies legal process for exclusive-use rights, and warns all complexes to follow the law.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 29, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Cape court has ruled that rules giving a single Primavera apartment owner exclusive use of shared spaces were never legally valid. This means he must now share those areas with other residents.
  • The owner will have to give up most of the exclusive-use areas but remains responsible for caring for his roof terrace and skylights, while the body corporate will maintain the main roof.
  • The judgment also clarifies that levy payments and voting rights must reflect official deeds office records. It urges all sectional title schemes to follow correct legal procedures for exclusive-use rights.

The Western Cape High Court has intervened to resolve a long-standing dispute in the Primavera Sectional Title Scheme, a residential complex in Cape Town where one owner had been granted private use of several shared spaces for years.

Michael Adrian Patrick Godby bought his unit in 2006, relying on 1990 rules to use a roof terrace, parking bay, storeroom, and cupboard under the stairs. For nearly 20 years, he benefited while other owners paid for these through their levies.

Acting Judge E Jonker ruled the rules were never legal. The law requires formal registration at the deeds office for private rights to shared spaces. Handwritten notes and informal agreements are invalid.

“Resolutions and arrangements, however well-intentioned, cannot create legally enforceable exclusive use rights without full compliance with the law,” the judgment stated.

The court ordered Godby to leave the parking bay, storeroom, and cupboard within 30 days. He loses access to these but keeps and must now maintain his roof terrace.

Who pays for what

The judgment also cleared up responsibility for maintenance. The body corporate must continue looking after the main structure of the roof because it’s common property. However, Godby, as the unit owner, must pay for the upkeep of his terrace and the skylights that only serve his unit.

Another important issue was how levies are calculated. Godby said his share had changed over the years, but the court confirmed that only the official figures at the deeds office matter. For his unit, the participation quota is 0.320, and that figure decides his share of levies and voting rights.

A lesson for all sectional schemes

Although the ruling went against him, the judge noted that Godby genuinely believed he had the rights, since the rules were in place long before he moved in and had been allowed to stand for years. To keep things fair, the court said each party must pay its own legal costs.

The court also urged the Primavera body corporate and its members to fix the situation properly by using the correct legal process under the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act. That way, everyone knows exactly what their rights and responsibilities are, and future disputes can be avoided.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Clickhereto follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Body corporate Exclusive Use rights property disputes Sectional title law Western Cape High Court
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    One man’s stand against eviction becomes a victory for land justice

    October 1, 2025

    Mpumalanga High Court grants leave to appeal in Barberton Makhonjwa Mountains Heritage Site dispute

    September 30, 2025

    Western Cape court compels maintenance payment after talaq in Muslim marriage divorce case

    September 30, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 6   +   3   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Consumer Protection Law
    4 Mins Read

    Final ruling sends a clear message on misleading health claims after Heala.org sugar ad controversy

    By Kennedy MudzuliOctober 5, 20254 Mins Read

    South Africa’s ad regulator has upheld a ruling against Heala.org, finding its sugar ad made misleading health claims without scientific nuance.

    Home Affairs funeral policy fraud exposed as Calvinia official exploits the dead

    October 4, 2025

    FSCA flags unauthorised investment operators Skuriey.rsa, AMFX Solutions, Dazzle Brilliance Diamond

    October 4, 2025

    South Africa turns food waste talk into action as government, business, and communities embrace real change

    October 4, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Final ruling sends a clear message on misleading health claims after Heala.org sugar ad controversy

    October 5, 2025

    Home Affairs funeral policy fraud exposed as Calvinia official exploits the dead

    October 4, 2025

    FSCA flags unauthorised investment operators Skuriey.rsa, AMFX Solutions, Dazzle Brilliance Diamond

    October 4, 2025
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2025 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.