Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Supreme Court of Appeal overturns R1 million unlawful detention award to parolee

May 6, 2026

RAF made it harder for crash victims to claim compensation, but the court has intervened

May 6, 2026

Where did we go wrong? When acid is served as water and blind loyalty becomes poison

May 5, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Supreme Court of Appeal overturns R1 million unlawful detention award to parolee
  • RAF made it harder for crash victims to claim compensation, but the court has intervened
  • Where did we go wrong? When acid is served as water and blind loyalty becomes poison
  • Tenants taking their landlord to court over claims of an unsafe home and unaddressed repairs
  • Gautrain expansion puts South Africa’s land rights and expropriation laws to the test
  • Pretoria High Court to decide whether baby savers are criminals or lifesavers
  • High Court protects essential water pipeline at Sefako Makgatho University
  • Medical failures left woman infertile and permanently scarred
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » RAF made it harder for crash victims to claim compensation, but the court has intervened
Civil Law

RAF made it harder for crash victims to claim compensation, but the court has intervened

Supreme Court of Appeal finds stricter Road Accident Fund filing requirements created unlawful barriers to compensation.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliMay 6, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • The Supreme Court of Appeal has found that new RAF claim rules have made it more difficult for crash victims to receive compensation.
  • The court found that extra paperwork and stricter filing rules created serious challenges for people trying to make valid claims.
  • The ruling brings back the 2008 RAF 1 form and gives claimants until 30 September 2026 to resubmit their claims.

The Supreme Court of Appeal has ruled that stricter Road Accident Fund (RAF) claim rules made it harder for crash victims to get compensation.

The court dismissed an appeal by the RAF and its leadership, confirming that the tougher filing requirements brought in during 2022 unfairly raised the bar for making valid claims.

The dispute focused on Board Notice 271 of 2022 and a revised RAF 1 claim form, both of which made claimants submit more documents and information before their claims would even be considered.

Judge CE Heaton Nicholls wrote that the new RAF 1 form put real obstacles in the way of accident victims by demanding more from them. Judge Nicholls called the claim form the legal gateway for people seeking compensation.

Extra requirements placed real hurdles in the way

The Supreme Court said the new RAF 1 form forced people to provide more documents than what was needed in the 2008 rules. The court ruled that these tougher filing rules directly affected claimants, as a valid claim is needed to get compensation and to extend the time allowed for making a claim.

Judge Nicholls said the Minister of Transport’s decision made things harder for claimants by forcing them to hand in more documents for their claims to count. The court also confirmed the legal standard for claim forms. The judge said that it is enough for claimants to mostly meet the requirements.

Minister’s approval was not valid

The court found that the Minister of Transport did not follow the rules for fair decision-making before approving the new RAF 1 form. There was no public enquiry or chance for people to comment, as required by law.

The court also said there was no sign that the Minister thought for themselves about whether the new form was actually needed. Judge Nicholls added that there was nothing to show the Minister had made an independent decision.

Because the Minister’s decision was not lawful, the court decided that Board Notice 271 could not stand on its own. Judge Nicholls said that since the Minister’s decision could not stand, neither could Board Notice 271.

The 2008 RAF 1 form is back

The judgment means the RAF must use the 2008 claim form again until a new form is properly approved. People whose claims were already accepted under the old system will have their claims processed as normal.

If your claim was rejected or ignored, you now have until 30 September 2026 to try again with the 2008 form, and if you succeed, you will keep your original lodgement date.

The appeal was dismissed, and the losing side must pay the legal costs, including for two lawyers if they were employed.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Clickhere to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

administrative law personal injury law RAF claims Road Accident Fund Supreme Court of Appeal
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Supreme Court of Appeal overturns R1 million unlawful detention award to parolee

    May 6, 2026

    Medical failures left woman infertile and permanently scarred

    May 5, 2026

    Top court orders fresh look at 30-year sentence in robbery case to determine fairness

    April 29, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 8   +   5   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Civil Law
    4 Mins Read

    Supreme Court of Appeal overturns R1 million unlawful detention award to parolee

    By Kennedy MudzuliMay 6, 20264 Mins Read

    The Supreme Court of Appeal has overturned a Gauteng High Court ruling that awarded Nkosana Thomas Leso R1 million in damages, finding that although part of his detention was unlawful, any viable claim had prescribed.

    RAF made it harder for crash victims to claim compensation, but the court has intervened

    May 6, 2026

    Where did we go wrong? When acid is served as water and blind loyalty becomes poison

    May 5, 2026

    Tenants taking their landlord to court over claims of an unsafe home and unaddressed repairs

    May 5, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Supreme Court of Appeal overturns R1 million unlawful detention award to parolee

    May 6, 2026

    RAF made it harder for crash victims to claim compensation, but the court has intervened

    May 6, 2026

    Where did we go wrong? When acid is served as water and blind loyalty becomes poison

    May 5, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.