- Grade 5 learners accused Ms Snyders of abuse, but testimony revealed a coordinated plot to remove her from Primrose Park Primary.
- Toxic class rivalry between Grade 5A and 5B engulfed both learners and teachers, driving a campaign of fabricated allegations.
- The Labour Court upheld the arbitrator’s finding that the claims against Ms Snyders were fabricated, dismissing the review and awarding costs in her favour.
From the outset, the case of teacher vindication at Primrose Park Primary was mired in drama and deception. What began as whispers among Grade 5A learners, heightened by class rivalry, quickly escalated into written complaints accusing teacher Lee-Ann Liezel Snyders of verbal and physical abuse.
The allegations were shocking, including racial slurs, smacking, inappropriate comments, and even forced massages. A disciplinary inquiry initially upheld 14 of 17 charges, leading to Snyders’s dismissal.
At arbitration, the truth surfaced. Learner B, a key witness, admitted under oath, “Nothing happened in her class. That was all the lies the children made up.” The testimony revealed that the accusations were manufactured under group pressure, part of a broader effort to have Snyders removed from the school.
Class rivalry and the making of false allegations
Teacher vindication in this case was hard-won against a backdrop of toxic competition between Grade 5A and 5B. The school’s former principal, described in the judgment only as Mr Ward, described the rivalry as poisonous, affecting both learners and teachers. Evidence showed that one Ms Abrahams, the Grade 5A teacher, encouraged her class to document and report on Snyders’s actions, fueling the campaign.
The arbitrator found the complaints were coordinated and unsupported by independent evidence. Most of the evidence led at this arbitration pointed to fabrications, the ruling stated, underscoring the dangers of unchecked rivalry and groupthink in a school environment.
Despite the campaign against her, several students described Snyders as kind and competent. Learner B praised her as “a nice teacher,” while other students retracted or contradicted their initial statements. The arbitrator rejected the more sensational allegations as implausible and uncorroborated, concluding that Ms Snyders had not acted as alleged.
Labour Court exposes the truth behind the allegations
The Western Cape Education Department sought to overturn the arbitration outcome, arguing the arbitrator had erred. However, the Labour Court found the decision to be reasonable and in line with the Labour Relations Act.
Acting Judge V Barthus dismissed the department’s review and ordered it to cover Snyders’s legal costs. The judge noted that more thought and consideration should have been applied before approaching this court.
Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.
