Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Unfair dismissal in South Africa: What the law says, and where things go wrong

June 5, 2026

High Court rules Bitcoin is both money and capital under SA’s exchange control laws

June 5, 2026

Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert

June 5, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Unfair dismissal in South Africa: What the law says, and where things go wrong
  • High Court rules Bitcoin is both money and capital under SA’s exchange control laws
  • Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert
  • Municipality cannot reopen a case settled by a binding plea and sanction agreement
  • FSCA imposes R5.39 million in penalties on financial services firms
  • Wits student wins leave to appeal refusal to renew 2026 registration
  • Africa Day celebrations and the enduring gendered contradictions of African unity
  • Businesses urged to make only provable advertising claims
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Parliament exposes unlawful RAF regime as road accident victims wait for justice
Regulatory Law

Parliament exposes unlawful RAF regime as road accident victims wait for justice

Parliament uncovers years of unlawful RAF claims as road accident victims and advocates demand urgent reform.
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterNovember 3, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • SCOPA hearings confirm manipulated claims, illegal accounting, and ministerial awareness of RAF violations.
  • The Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims (APRAV) states that unlawful policies must be withdrawn before reform can commence.
  • Victims demand public accountability and full restoration of lawful claims under the RAF Act.

The Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims (APRAV) says Minister of Transport Barbara Creecy has knowingly allowed an unlawful claims system to operate and must now take action.

After explosive testimony before Parliament’s Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA), the organisation is demanding the immediate withdrawal of Board Notice 271 and a full return to the legally mandated Road Accident Fund Act of 2008.

APRAV claims the Ministry has ignored repeated court rulings and ongoing public warnings. It has called on Creecy to restore lawful administration and end the use of illegal claim procedures. “The minister can no longer plead ignorance. The law is clear, and the consequences of unlawful administration are severe,” the organisation stated.

Board Notice 271, introduced by the Road Accident Fund in May 2022, replaced the original claims process with new forms and requirements that courts have since declared unlawful. It allowed the Fund to reject valid claims by labelling them “non-compliant” or “unregistered,” effectively removing them from its liability records. Despite being set aside by the judiciary, the Fund continues to apply these provisions.

The Road Accident Fund Act of 2008 is the legally binding framework that governs how road-accident claims must be processed. It outlines the Fund’s obligations to victims, including who qualifies for compensation and how claims must be submitted, assessed, and paid. APRAV argues that returning to this Act is not optional, but a legal and moral necessity.

A defining test of leadership

APRAV has called on Creecy to withdraw the unlawful Board Notice and restore the Fund to lawful compliance. “Victims of road crashes, denied justice under an illegal claims regime, deserve a public forum where the minister explains how the Fund will restore the law and protect victims’ rights. Reform cannot start while illegal policies remain in place. Nor can trust be rebuilt without full transparency,” the organisation said in a statement.

Testimony presented during the hearings revealed that the Fund’s leadership, with the minister’s knowledge, implemented unlawful accounting standards and manipulated liabilities to reduce financial exposure. The switch to IPSAS 42 and the use of Board Notice 271 were described as deliberate strategies to remove tens of thousands of legitimate claims from the records.

Former RAF actuarial head IW Charakupa testified that these reforms caused a 65 percent drop in new claims and a 58 percent decline in finalised matters between 2020 and 2024. He said the changes were designed to support an accounting standard that conceals the Fund’s true financial position.

SCOPA Chairperson Songezo Zibi and MP Patrick Atkinson criticised the Ministry for allowing illegality to persist. Witnesses, including Thomas Harban from the Lawyers’ Professional Indemnity Insurance Fund, confirmed that the minister is fully aware of the unlawful system but continues to let it operate. Harban said there is no legal basis for the continued use of Board Notice 271 or its related claim-form system.

The path forward

APRAV says it supports the interventions proposed during the SCOPA hearings, especially those put forward by Harban. The group says the first step must be the immediate withdrawal of Board Notice 271, which continues to undermine lawful claims despite being declared invalid. It insists that the Road Accident Fund must return to the original procedures outlined in the 2008 Act, restoring the legal framework that protects victims and ensures fair compensation.

It is also urgent to re-register all claims unlawfully rejected under the current system, according to APRAV, which further states that these claims must be properly recorded and given link numbers to ensure they are processed and paid. Without this, thousands of victims will remain stuck in a system that refuses to recognise their rights, it said.

Victims remain unpaid

While the SCOPA inquiry has created momentum, APRAV warns that it will mean nothing if reform stalls. “The illegal system remains in place. Victims remain unpaid,” the organisation said.

Ngoako Mohlaloga, Deputy Chair of APRAV, said the numbers show a humanitarian and financial crisis. He warned that the Fund has abandoned its mandate and continues to operate outside the law.

“We call on every South African, from civil organisations to Parliament itself, to demand transparent reform and lawful administration of the Fund,” Mohlaloga said. “The law has spoken. Now the Ministry must act. Justice for road-accident victims cannot wait another day.”

Conviction.co.za 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims Road Accident Fund SCOPA hearings unlawful policies victim rights
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

Related Posts

FSCA imposes R5.39 million in penalties on financial services firms

June 5, 2026

Businesses urged to make only provable advertising claims

June 4, 2026

Toddler’s future forever changed after an accident just before his third birthday

June 4, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 9   +   7   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Employment and Labour Law Series
7 Mins Read

Unfair dismissal in South Africa: What the law says, and where things go wrong

By Ann-Suhet MarxJune 5, 20267 Mins Read

Unfair dismissal is one of the most common workplace disputes in South Africa. Understanding the rules can help both employees and employers avoid costly mistakes.

High Court rules Bitcoin is both money and capital under SA’s exchange control laws

June 5, 2026

Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert

June 5, 2026

Municipality cannot reopen a case settled by a binding plea and sanction agreement

June 5, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Agricultural advisors declared scientists in landmark Labour Court ruling

February 17, 2026

R13,914 debt triggers sale of R380 000 home, transfer halted amid execution flaws

April 20, 2026

Understanding employee rights, workplace protections and grievance resolution in South Africa

June 8, 2025
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by