Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.
- Madlanga Commission completes 174 days as inquiry amasses 131,634 pages of evidence
- Child’s burns expose Eskom’s legal duty to protect communities from dangerous power lines
- Void or invalid body corporate meetings: CSOS remedies for sectional title disputes
- While Ekurhuleni investigation continues, police probe other abduction and missing women cases
- Father asks court to terminate mother’s parental rights so he and his wife can adopt child
- Ex-Emfuleni CFO ordered to pay for calling supply chain manager corrupt on WhatsApp
- Employer found to have unfairly dismissed a sick accounts manager instead of accommodating her
- Husband sends agents to seize Mercedes from estranged wife during bitter divorce battle
Author: Kennedy Mudzuli
Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za
The Eastern Cape High Court, Gqeberha has mandated the Summer Shuttle Services Pty) Ltd to pay R66,544 to the estate of the late Zamokuhle Madaka, stemming from a disputed taxi service operation following his death in July 2023. The court also set in motion a comprehensive investigation into the financial handling of the deceased’s taxi revenues, which has seen an array of legal wrangling between parties involved. The urgent application initiated by the estate sought to clarify and compel payments due for the use of three Toyota Quantum taxis registered under the deceased’s name. The applicant, Landile Philiso, who represents…
The Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA) has faced a significant judicial setback following the judgment regarding its treatment of employee Pholile Hoyo. In a ruling delivered in November, the Labour Appeal Court in Cape Town has ruled PRASA’s actions constituted unfair discrimination based on race, as well as unequal pay for equal work, in violation of the Employment Equity Act. This legal battle began when Hoyo, who has been associated with PRASA since 1999, filed a grievance in July 2016 after he was appointed as the Production Manager in Culemborg, but was allegedly denied an acting allowance while…
The High Court of South Africa’s Mpumalanga Division has granted a mother the permission to permanently relocate her minor daughter to Mauritius. This ruling comes following a contentious custody dispute with the child’s father, who opposed the move, citing a lack of prior consultation. The case revolves around the upbringing of the minor child, who was born on 5 April 2012 from a relationship between the applicant and the respondent. The couple’s relationship deteriorated shortly after the birth, leading to a complex custody arrangement. In 2015, they entered into a parenting plan awarding primary care and residence to the mother,…
The Bloemfontein High Court has upheld the life sentence of Tshokolo David Lesetla, affirming the conviction for the dreadful rape of a seven-year-old girl. This landmark decision, handed down on 14 November 2024, serves as a powerful reminder of the justice system’s dedication to protecting vulnerable witnesses, particularly children, in the face of horrific crimes. This harrowing case dates back to an April evening in 2010, when the young victim was sent on a simple errand to buy a soft drink—a mundane routine that would lead her into the clutches of Lesetla. Instead of a harmless trip, she was lured…
Gauteng MEC for Education exonerated in negligence lawsuit involving special needs learner
The Gauteng High Court, Pretoria has dismissed a claim against the MEC for Education and officials from Medicos Special School, following allegations of negligence regarding the safety and care of a student with cerebral palsy and significant intellectual impairment. The case centred around a tragic incident occurring on 26 August 2016, when the learner suffered head injuries while at the special needs institution in Soshanguve, Pretoria. His mother claimed the school’s administration and staff, including the Principal and Deputy Principal, had breached their duty of care, resulting in her son’s injury. Judge GN Moshoana, who authored the judgment, pointed out…
The Labour Appeal Court, sitting in Cape Town, has overturned a previous decision that set aside an arbitration award related to job grading disputes involving employees of the Overberg District Municipality. This landmark judgement, delivered on November 15, 2024, underlines the importance of fair labour practices within municipal employment structures. The case, initiated by the Independent Municipal and Allied Trade Union (IMATU) on behalf of employees, challenged the actions of the Overberg District Municipality and the South African Local Government Bargaining Council (SALGBC). At the heart of the appeal was the assertion that the municipality had committed an unfair labour…
A South African court has ruled in favour of a motorist who suffered significant injuries in a collision that took place on 30 June 2018. The ruling, by the Limpopo High Court, Polokwane, saw the plaintiff awarded R1,720,802.33 in damages after a lengthy legal battle against the Road Accident Fund (RAF), marking a crucial victory for victims of road accidents seeking justice and financial redress. The case stems from an accident where the plaintiff, driving a white Polo Vivo, collided with a minibus operated by the insured driver, Makgathi Sathekge. The incident stirred a legal dispute over who bore responsibility…
In a surprising turn of events, a motorist’s attempt to claim damages from the Road Accident Fund (RAF) following a collision in 2017 landed him in hot water, with the Limpopo High Court ruling that he is solely responsible for the accident. The decision underscores the complexities surrounding road traffic claims and the importance of establishing negligence. The case revolved around an incident that occurred on 29 July 2017, when the applicant, who was driving his Nissan NP200 from Makhumele village to Malamulele, found himself involved in a dramatic collision. The plaintiff testified that while driving behind another vehicle, the…
An execution order against the primary residence of the debtor should be the last resort, and only when all other avenues to satisfy the arrears have been meaningfully exhausted. In the matter before the Western Cape High Court, Standard Bank had applied for default judgment and an order to declare an property in Cape Town executable, subject to a reserve price, and to authorise the Registrar of the High Court to issue a Writ in Execution against the immovable property. But crucially, the arrears were hardly three months old. The mortgage bond was registered in favour of Standard Bank on…
