Key points
- The North West High Court dismissed Agenbag Motor Group’s appeal to recover storage fees for a vehicle returned in 2009.
- The court found that the claim was brought too late and against the wrong person.
- The ruling underscores the importance of suing the correct party within the legal time limits and having a clear contractual basis for any debt claim.
A vehicle returned in 2009, a bill for storage sent seven years later, and a court fight that lasted almost a decade; that’s the story behind a legal dispute that finally came to an end with a major loss for Agenbag Motor Group.
On 1 July 2025, the North West High Court in Mahikeng dismissed the company’s appeal in its attempt to recover storage fees from a man it claimed owed them for keeping a car on their premises. The court ruled that the claim had prescribed years ago and was brought against someone who was never responsible in the first place. For Agenbag, it’s the end of a costly and ultimately unsuccessful legal battle.
How it all started
The trouble began back in March 2009, when a funeral business called Ipolokeng Funeral Parlour, represented by Maria Nkitseng, bought a vehicle from Agenbag Motor Group for R157 000. Shortly after the purchase, the car started giving mechanical problems. Despite several efforts to repair it, the vehicle continued to fail. Eventually, the buyers returned the car to the dealership.
In 2010, the funeral parlour launched legal action to get a full refund, but that case stalled and never reached a final decision. Then, years later in 2016, Agenbag Motor Group issued a surprise demand; they wanted payment for storage fees for the returned vehicle, claiming R350 per day. At that rate, the amount would have run into hundreds of thousands of rands.
But instead of going after the company that bought the car, Agenbag sued Molapo Eliah Nkitseng, Maria’s husband, who was not listed on the sale agreement and had nothing to do with the transaction. That misstep would prove critical.
The court's ruling
The Klerksdorp Magistrate’s Court dismissed the claim, and now the North West High Court has agreed. In its ruling, the court found that the storage fee claim had prescribed under South African law. The court held that any debt would have become due by 2011 at the latest, meaning that Agenbag had until 2014 to take legal action. But the summons was only issued in 2020, six years too late.
More importantly, the court confirmed that Molapo Nkitseng was never a party to the contract. The agreement was between Agenbag Motor Group and the funeral parlour. Suing Molapo personally, without proof that he owed anything, was a legal error. The court also pointed out that the correct party, the funeral parlour, had not even been joined to the proceedings, and this failure alone was enough to sink the case.
The judges concluded that there was no legal basis for the claim, and ordered Agenbag Motor Group to pay the costs of the appeal.
#Conviction
Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.
