Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Top court orders fresh look at 30-year sentence in robbery case to determine fairness

April 29, 2026

Wrong hearing loss compensation formula costs Rand Mutual dearly

April 29, 2026

Boxer joins SPAR in second ruling over hidden SIM card requirement in free data promotions

April 29, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Top court orders fresh look at 30-year sentence in robbery case to determine fairness
  • Wrong hearing loss compensation formula costs Rand Mutual dearly
  • Boxer joins SPAR in second ruling over hidden SIM card requirement in free data promotions
  • Security giant fails to stop former executive from joining rival company
  • Legal profession is a mature profession that does not reward premature ambition
  • No court has yet ruled on electric vehicles charging in South African complexes
  • Labour Court warns urgent roll is not a casino, orders lawyers to personally pay costs
  • Woman fracturing ankle on unsafe construction surface contributed to her fall
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Caution: Road Accident Benefits Scheme ‘will create new victims, not justice’
Constitutional Law

Caution: Road Accident Benefits Scheme ‘will create new victims, not justice’

The Road Accident Benefits Scheme promises reform, but critics warn it will dismantle hard-won legal protections, exclude vulnerable victims, and deepen systemic failures
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterJuly 10, 2025Updated:July 10, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Ngoako Mohlaloga, APRAV Deputy Chairperson.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Fewer rights, no court access, and reduced compensation.
  • Vulnerable groups, including dependents and informal workers, left out. 
  •  System can't cope with 1.5 million payments a year. 

The Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims (APRAV) has voiced strong opposition to the reintroduction of the Road Accident Benefits Scheme (RABS), a Bill previously rejected multiple times by Parliament due to its unconstitutional limitations, unaffordable structure, and impractical design. 

“You can’t fix a broken system by stripping away rights. RABS is not reform; it’s regression,” says Ngoako Mohlaloga, APRAV Deputy Chairperson. 

APRAV’s response follows COSATU’s recent public support for RABS, which the trade union federation called a progressive measure aimed at protecting the poor. But APRAV warns that RABS will do the opposite: deny victims access to justice, limit financial support, and overwhelm an already dysfunctional Road Accident Fund (RAF). 

“This Bill offers less money, fewer rights, and no path to challenge the system when it fails you,” adds Pieter de Bruyn, APRAV Chairperson. “If implemented, it will turn the RAF from a safety net into a bureaucratic trap.” 

No more lump sums, just dependency 

Under RABS, road accident victims will no longer receive once-off compensation. Instead, they’ll receive monthly annuities, regardless of the severity of injury or loss of income. These payments are: 

  • Capped, even for high-earning breadwinners 
  • Terminated immediately if the victim dies 
  • Subject to budget cuts or administrative reassessment 

“You can’t pay for trauma surgeries, prosthetics, or settle urgent debt with a few thousand rand a month,” says de Bruyn. “RABS shifts the financial burden to victims when they’re at their most vulnerable.” 

No court access, no legal support 

RABS removes the right of victims to take their case to court or to access legal assistance. The system places full administrative control in the hands of the RAF, leaving victims with no way to challenge underpayments, delays, or rejections. 

“It’s a closed loop,” says Mohlaloga. “Victims will be trapped in a system they can’t fight, even when it fails them completely.” 

Reckless drivers get paid too 

By introducing a no-fault model, RABS ensures that even negligent or intoxicated drivers can qualify for compensation. It erases accountability and creates a system vulnerable to fraud, while victims receive reduced and delayed payouts. 

Entire groups will be excluded 

RABS will also exclude: 

  • Children over 18 who lose a parent 
  • Elderly victims over the age of 60 
  • Foreign nationals, even if they contribute to the fuel levy 
  • Informal workers, caregivers, and those not formally employed 

APRAV calls this a system of exclusion, not protection. 

“If your 19-year-old son depends on you and you’re killed in a crash, he will get nothing,” says Mohlaloga. “If you’re a foreign nurse who pays fuel tax, you’re still excluded. It’s unjust.” 

The system cannot handle what RABS demands 

The current RAF already struggles to settle claims within the required 120-day period. RABS will require it to process and deliver 1.5 million monthly payments per year—a feat for which no infrastructure currently exists. 

APRAV's alternative: Real reform, already ready 

APRAV has presented Parliament with a 10-point evidence-based action plan that: 

  • Saves over R4.8 billion a year 
  • Establishes Settlement Hub and RAF Specialist Tribunals 
  • Improves claim turnaround time 
  • Retains legal recourse for victims 
  • Fixes administrative blockages 
  • Requires minor practical changes to existing legislation 

“You don’t tear down the foundation when the house needs fixing,” says de Bruyn. “You fix the cracks. That’s what APRAV’s plan does.” 

Join the movement: Let victims be heard 

APRAV is calling for: 

  • An urgent pause on the revival of RABS 
  • A transparent, public engagement process
  • An audience with the Minister of Transport
  • A seat at the decision-making table for victims and those who advocate for them 

APRAV invites legal practitioners, medical professionals, civil society organisations, victims, and ordinary South Africans to rally behind this cause. Send your support, stories, and submissions to: victims@aprav.co.za 

“Before rewriting the future of road crash compensation, government must listen to the people it will impact most,” says Mohlaloga. “Let the victims be heard.” 

#Conviction 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.      

constitutional justice legal exclusion RABS reform RAF Accountability road accident victims' rights
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

    Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

    Related Posts

    City of Tshwane electricity disconnection declared unlawful by High Court

    April 23, 2026

    Constitutional Court draws clear line between SAHRC and other Chapter 9 bodies

    April 22, 2026

    Judges Matter urges Parliament to act on Judge President Mbenenge misconduct finding

    April 18, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Criminal Law
    3 Mins Read

    Top court orders fresh look at 30-year sentence in robbery case to determine fairness

    By Kennedy MudzuliApril 29, 20263 Mins Read

    The Supreme Court of Appeal has ordered a fresh appeal on Ezhiah Skhumbuzo Mvubu’s effective 30 year prison sentence after finding that the reasons given for such a severe punishment were too sparse.

    Wrong hearing loss compensation formula costs Rand Mutual dearly

    April 29, 2026

    Boxer joins SPAR in second ruling over hidden SIM card requirement in free data promotions

    April 29, 2026

    Security giant fails to stop former executive from joining rival company

    April 29, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Top court orders fresh look at 30-year sentence in robbery case to determine fairness

    April 29, 2026

    Wrong hearing loss compensation formula costs Rand Mutual dearly

    April 29, 2026

    Boxer joins SPAR in second ruling over hidden SIM card requirement in free data promotions

    April 29, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.