Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Two common mistakes can sink CSOS disputes before hearings begin

July 23, 2026

Only one of four WhatsApp allegations against Harmony Gold found defamatory

July 23, 2026

Augmenting apartheid memory through art, exhibition and lived experience

July 22, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Two common mistakes can sink CSOS disputes before hearings begin
  • Only one of four WhatsApp allegations against Harmony Gold found defamatory
  • Augmenting apartheid memory through art, exhibition and lived experience
  • Labour Court stops municipal disciplinary hearing over AI citation concerns
  • Court approves surrogacy where second wife carries child for first wife under customary law
  • Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation
  • Transnet secures eviction order against unlawful occupiers in Cape Town crime hotspot
  • A decade of income protection payments declared an error despite earlier promises
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Caution: Road Accident Benefits Scheme ‘will create new victims, not justice’
Constitutional Law

Caution: Road Accident Benefits Scheme ‘will create new victims, not justice’

The Road Accident Benefits Scheme promises reform, but critics warn it will dismantle hard-won legal protections, exclude vulnerable victims, and deepen systemic failures
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterJuly 10, 2025Updated:July 10, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Ngoako Mohlaloga, APRAV Deputy Chairperson.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Fewer rights, no court access, and reduced compensation.
  • Vulnerable groups, including dependents and informal workers, left out. 
  •  System can't cope with 1.5 million payments a year. 

The Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims (APRAV) has voiced strong opposition to the reintroduction of the Road Accident Benefits Scheme (RABS), a Bill previously rejected multiple times by Parliament due to its unconstitutional limitations, unaffordable structure, and impractical design. 

“You can’t fix a broken system by stripping away rights. RABS is not reform; it’s regression,” says Ngoako Mohlaloga, APRAV Deputy Chairperson. 

APRAV’s response follows COSATU’s recent public support for RABS, which the trade union federation called a progressive measure aimed at protecting the poor. But APRAV warns that RABS will do the opposite: deny victims access to justice, limit financial support, and overwhelm an already dysfunctional Road Accident Fund (RAF). 

“This Bill offers less money, fewer rights, and no path to challenge the system when it fails you,” adds Pieter de Bruyn, APRAV Chairperson. “If implemented, it will turn the RAF from a safety net into a bureaucratic trap.” 

No more lump sums, just dependency 

Under RABS, road accident victims will no longer receive once-off compensation. Instead, they’ll receive monthly annuities, regardless of the severity of injury or loss of income. These payments are: 

  • Capped, even for high-earning breadwinners 
  • Terminated immediately if the victim dies 
  • Subject to budget cuts or administrative reassessment 

“You can’t pay for trauma surgeries, prosthetics, or settle urgent debt with a few thousand rand a month,” says de Bruyn. “RABS shifts the financial burden to victims when they’re at their most vulnerable.” 

No court access, no legal support 

RABS removes the right of victims to take their case to court or to access legal assistance. The system places full administrative control in the hands of the RAF, leaving victims with no way to challenge underpayments, delays, or rejections. 

“It’s a closed loop,” says Mohlaloga. “Victims will be trapped in a system they can’t fight, even when it fails them completely.” 

Reckless drivers get paid too 

By introducing a no-fault model, RABS ensures that even negligent or intoxicated drivers can qualify for compensation. It erases accountability and creates a system vulnerable to fraud, while victims receive reduced and delayed payouts. 

Entire groups will be excluded 

RABS will also exclude: 

  • Children over 18 who lose a parent 
  • Elderly victims over the age of 60 
  • Foreign nationals, even if they contribute to the fuel levy 
  • Informal workers, caregivers, and those not formally employed 

APRAV calls this a system of exclusion, not protection. 

“If your 19-year-old son depends on you and you’re killed in a crash, he will get nothing,” says Mohlaloga. “If you’re a foreign nurse who pays fuel tax, you’re still excluded. It’s unjust.” 

The system cannot handle what RABS demands 

The current RAF already struggles to settle claims within the required 120-day period. RABS will require it to process and deliver 1.5 million monthly payments per year—a feat for which no infrastructure currently exists. 

APRAV's alternative: Real reform, already ready 

APRAV has presented Parliament with a 10-point evidence-based action plan that: 

  • Saves over R4.8 billion a year 
  • Establishes Settlement Hub and RAF Specialist Tribunals 
  • Improves claim turnaround time 
  • Retains legal recourse for victims 
  • Fixes administrative blockages 
  • Requires minor practical changes to existing legislation 

“You don’t tear down the foundation when the house needs fixing,” says de Bruyn. “You fix the cracks. That’s what APRAV’s plan does.” 

Join the movement: Let victims be heard 

APRAV is calling for: 

  • An urgent pause on the revival of RABS 
  • A transparent, public engagement process
  • An audience with the Minister of Transport
  • A seat at the decision-making table for victims and those who advocate for them 

APRAV invites legal practitioners, medical professionals, civil society organisations, victims, and ordinary South Africans to rally behind this cause. Send your support, stories, and submissions to: victims@aprav.co.za 

“Before rewriting the future of road crash compensation, government must listen to the people it will impact most,” says Mohlaloga. “Let the victims be heard.” 

#Conviction 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.      

constitutional justice legal exclusion RABS reform RAF Accountability road accident victims' rights
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

Related Posts

Small Claims Court monetary jurisdiction increases to R30 000 to expand access to justice

July 22, 2026

President Ramaphosa faces court challenge for transferring currency powers to Finance Minister

July 20, 2026

Home Affairs removes medical report requirement for visa and permanent residence

July 18, 2026

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Property Law
5 Mins Read

Two common mistakes can sink CSOS disputes before hearings begin

By Conviction Staff ReporterJuly 23, 20265 Mins Read

Two recent Community Schemes Ombud Service rulings highlight how disputes involving developers and owners can fail because of a lack of legal standing or insufficient evidence before the merits are even considered.

Only one of four WhatsApp allegations against Harmony Gold found defamatory

July 23, 2026

Augmenting apartheid memory through art, exhibition and lived experience

July 22, 2026

Labour Court stops municipal disciplinary hearing over AI citation concerns

July 22, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

Wedding rehearsal or workplace protest? Judge rules in favour of singing mineworkers

July 21, 2026

Mpumalanga records highest initiation death toll, prompting CRL Rights Commission inquiry

July 21, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by