Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

High Court rules Bitcoin is both money and capital under SA’s exchange control laws

June 5, 2026

Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert

June 5, 2026

Municipality cannot reopen a case settled by a binding plea and sanction agreement

June 5, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • High Court rules Bitcoin is both money and capital under SA’s exchange control laws
  • Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert
  • Municipality cannot reopen a case settled by a binding plea and sanction agreement
  • FSCA imposes R5.39 million in penalties on financial services firms
  • Wits student wins leave to appeal refusal to renew 2026 registration
  • Africa Day celebrations and the enduring gendered contradictions of African unity
  • Businesses urged to make only provable advertising claims
  • Women travel up to 300km as abortion services fail in Eastern Cape and Limpopo
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Caution: Road Accident Benefits Scheme ‘will create new victims, not justice’
Constitutional Law

Caution: Road Accident Benefits Scheme ‘will create new victims, not justice’

The Road Accident Benefits Scheme promises reform, but critics warn it will dismantle hard-won legal protections, exclude vulnerable victims, and deepen systemic failures
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterJuly 10, 2025Updated:July 10, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Ngoako Mohlaloga, APRAV Deputy Chairperson.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Fewer rights, no court access, and reduced compensation.
  • Vulnerable groups, including dependents and informal workers, left out. 
  •  System can't cope with 1.5 million payments a year. 

The Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims (APRAV) has voiced strong opposition to the reintroduction of the Road Accident Benefits Scheme (RABS), a Bill previously rejected multiple times by Parliament due to its unconstitutional limitations, unaffordable structure, and impractical design. 

“You can’t fix a broken system by stripping away rights. RABS is not reform; it’s regression,” says Ngoako Mohlaloga, APRAV Deputy Chairperson. 

APRAV’s response follows COSATU’s recent public support for RABS, which the trade union federation called a progressive measure aimed at protecting the poor. But APRAV warns that RABS will do the opposite: deny victims access to justice, limit financial support, and overwhelm an already dysfunctional Road Accident Fund (RAF). 

“This Bill offers less money, fewer rights, and no path to challenge the system when it fails you,” adds Pieter de Bruyn, APRAV Chairperson. “If implemented, it will turn the RAF from a safety net into a bureaucratic trap.” 

No more lump sums, just dependency 

Under RABS, road accident victims will no longer receive once-off compensation. Instead, they’ll receive monthly annuities, regardless of the severity of injury or loss of income. These payments are: 

  • Capped, even for high-earning breadwinners 
  • Terminated immediately if the victim dies 
  • Subject to budget cuts or administrative reassessment 

“You can’t pay for trauma surgeries, prosthetics, or settle urgent debt with a few thousand rand a month,” says de Bruyn. “RABS shifts the financial burden to victims when they’re at their most vulnerable.” 

No court access, no legal support 

RABS removes the right of victims to take their case to court or to access legal assistance. The system places full administrative control in the hands of the RAF, leaving victims with no way to challenge underpayments, delays, or rejections. 

“It’s a closed loop,” says Mohlaloga. “Victims will be trapped in a system they can’t fight, even when it fails them completely.” 

Reckless drivers get paid too 

By introducing a no-fault model, RABS ensures that even negligent or intoxicated drivers can qualify for compensation. It erases accountability and creates a system vulnerable to fraud, while victims receive reduced and delayed payouts. 

Entire groups will be excluded 

RABS will also exclude: 

  • Children over 18 who lose a parent 
  • Elderly victims over the age of 60 
  • Foreign nationals, even if they contribute to the fuel levy 
  • Informal workers, caregivers, and those not formally employed 

APRAV calls this a system of exclusion, not protection. 

“If your 19-year-old son depends on you and you’re killed in a crash, he will get nothing,” says Mohlaloga. “If you’re a foreign nurse who pays fuel tax, you’re still excluded. It’s unjust.” 

The system cannot handle what RABS demands 

The current RAF already struggles to settle claims within the required 120-day period. RABS will require it to process and deliver 1.5 million monthly payments per year—a feat for which no infrastructure currently exists. 

APRAV's alternative: Real reform, already ready 

APRAV has presented Parliament with a 10-point evidence-based action plan that: 

  • Saves over R4.8 billion a year 
  • Establishes Settlement Hub and RAF Specialist Tribunals 
  • Improves claim turnaround time 
  • Retains legal recourse for victims 
  • Fixes administrative blockages 
  • Requires minor practical changes to existing legislation 

“You don’t tear down the foundation when the house needs fixing,” says de Bruyn. “You fix the cracks. That’s what APRAV’s plan does.” 

Join the movement: Let victims be heard 

APRAV is calling for: 

  • An urgent pause on the revival of RABS 
  • A transparent, public engagement process
  • An audience with the Minister of Transport
  • A seat at the decision-making table for victims and those who advocate for them 

APRAV invites legal practitioners, medical professionals, civil society organisations, victims, and ordinary South Africans to rally behind this cause. Send your support, stories, and submissions to: victims@aprav.co.za 

“Before rewriting the future of road crash compensation, government must listen to the people it will impact most,” says Mohlaloga. “Let the victims be heard.” 

#Conviction 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.      

constitutional justice legal exclusion RABS reform RAF Accountability road accident victims' rights
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

Related Posts

Mbeki and Mabandla accuse TRC Commission of sidestepping court challenge

May 29, 2026

Anti-money laundering Bill proposes lifestyle audits and tougher penalties

May 29, 2026

Ramaphosa says Phala Phala panel relied on hearsay and misunderstood its mandate

May 26, 2026

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Commercial Law
5 Mins Read

High Court rules Bitcoin is both money and capital under SA’s exchange control laws

By Kennedy MudzuliJune 5, 20265 Mins Read

The High Court has confirmed that Bitcoin is both money and capital under South Africa’s exchange control laws, dismissing a challenge to forfeiture orders.

Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert

June 5, 2026

Municipality cannot reopen a case settled by a binding plea and sanction agreement

June 5, 2026

FSCA imposes R5.39 million in penalties on financial services firms

June 5, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Agricultural advisors declared scientists in landmark Labour Court ruling

February 17, 2026

R13,914 debt triggers sale of R380 000 home, transfer halted amid execution flaws

April 20, 2026

Understanding employee rights, workplace protections and grievance resolution in South Africa

June 8, 2025
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by