Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Behind the March and March hype: Leadership and the question of state effectiveness in Africa

June 24, 2026

Comrades no-fly zone brings widespread drone law breaches into focus, warns legal expert

June 24, 2026

Struck-off advocate and former detective fail separate bids to join legal profession

June 24, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Behind the March and March hype: Leadership and the question of state effectiveness in Africa
  • Comrades no-fly zone brings widespread drone law breaches into focus, warns legal expert
  • Struck-off advocate and former detective fail separate bids to join legal profession
  • Wife wins bid to challenge State’s forfeiture of family home and Range Rover
  • Legal Sector Code targets historical inequalities in South Africa’s legal profession
  • Prenatal diagnosis debate sparks call for balanced information on Down syndrome
  • Adolescents, identity and being you in a world that wants you to be something else
  • Correctional Services’ equity targets block promotion of top candidate
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Damaged television reveals false insurance promise by removal company
Regulatory Law

Damaged television reveals false insurance promise by removal company

ARB finds EFI Removals misled customers with unprovable “Risk Insurance” claim.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliNovember 23, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • ARB determines EFI Removals misled consumers by advertising “Risk Insurance” without proof of coverage.
  • The complainant’s damaged television highlighted the disparity between the promise and the actual evidence.
  • ARB orders the removal of the claim from all advertising and instructs members not to accept it.

When a customer’s Hisense television was damaged during a long-distance move, EFI Furniture Removals’ website promise of “Risk Insurance” provided little protection.

The Advertising Regulatory Board concluded that the claim misled consumers and created an expectation that loss or damage during transit would be covered. The complainant stated that the television’s screen looked broken or malfunctioning.

He also mentioned that EFI refused to respond when he asked about the complimentary insurance offered. The Directorate noted that services like this involve some risk since household items must be packed safely, transported, and unpacked at the new destination.

The Directorate also pointed out that it cannot assess the quality of an advertiser’s services, only whether the advertising violates the ARB Code. Household items can be valuable or carry sentimental worth, and the claim that “Risk Insurance” is provided as a complimentary service likely suggests extra security to customers.

Advertiser fails to substantiate insurance claim

EFI Removals claimed it had sufficient transit insurance, but that it only covered fire, accident, collision, or overturning. The company stated that the complainant “signed off on this insurance cover when he accepted the quote” and noted customers were responsible for ensuring items are securely packed. The Directorate requested proof of the policy or a copy of the quotation document, but “no such copy was provided.”

The advertiser did not clarify whether the television that appeared damaged during the move was securely packed or if other factors contributed to the visible damage. EFI “has not explained why its ‘Risk Insurance’ would not cover this incident.”

ARB finds claim misleading

The Directorate observed that the term “risk insurance” suggests that insurance exists and that any damage will be covered. This has not been demonstrated. Clause 2 of Section II of the ARB Code states that “advertisements should not be framed in a way that abuses consumer trust or takes advantage of their inexperience, knowledge, or credulity.”

Clause 4.2.1 states that “advertisements should not contain any statements or visuals that, directly or indirectly, through omission, ambiguity, inaccuracy, exaggerated claims or otherwise, are likely to mislead the consumer.” The Directorate concluded that the claim “Risk Insurance” as it appears on the Advertiser’s website violates Clause 4.2.1 of Section II of the Code.

Sanction and consumer protection

The ARB ordered EFI Furniture Removals to retract its claim of offering “Risk Insurance.” Members of the ARB were instructed “not to accept any advertising from the advertiser if it claims to provide complimentary ‘Risk Insurance.’”

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

ARB decision consumer protection EFI Removals insurance misleading claims
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Struck-off advocate and former detective fail separate bids to join legal profession

June 24, 2026

Legal Sector Code targets historical inequalities in South Africa’s legal profession

June 24, 2026

The funeral policy looked legitimate until investigators called the consent number directly

June 20, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 5   +   5   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Opinion
5 Mins Read

Behind the March and March hype: Leadership and the question of state effectiveness in Africa

By Professor Edith Dinong PhaswanaJune 24, 20265 Mins Read

Professor Edith Phaswana examines migration, governance and leadership, arguing that Africa’s future depends on stronger institutions and effective states.

Comrades no-fly zone brings widespread drone law breaches into focus, warns legal expert

June 24, 2026

Struck-off advocate and former detective fail separate bids to join legal profession

June 24, 2026

Wife wins bid to challenge State’s forfeiture of family home and Range Rover

June 24, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Standard Bank should have investigated mental health concerns before dismissal, CCMA finds

June 10, 2026

Tshwane loses land expropriation battle, ordered to relocate Kanana Village residents

June 2, 2026

Fidelity cannot stop former manager from operating Cape Town security business

June 22, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by