Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Court dismisses bid to remove News24 article on controversial Ekurhuleni toilet tender

May 4, 2026

One in five domestic workers reports verbal, physical, or sexual abuse at work

May 3, 2026

Africa-centred rethink of international legal history gains ground

May 2, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Court dismisses bid to remove News24 article on controversial Ekurhuleni toilet tender
  • One in five domestic workers reports verbal, physical, or sexual abuse at work
  • Africa-centred rethink of international legal history gains ground
  • Schools urged to end exclusion of pregnant learners in new regulations
  • What people keep getting wrong about SA marriage law, and why they end up in court
  • Workers’ Day: What AI readiness means for your world of work and the future of employment
  • When prison is no shame in a society where corruption becomes a badge of success
  • Husband fails to settle levies debt by offering property he co-owns with ex-wife
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Damaged television reveals false insurance promise by removal company
Regulatory Law

Damaged television reveals false insurance promise by removal company

ARB finds EFI Removals misled customers with unprovable “Risk Insurance” claim.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliNovember 23, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • ARB determines EFI Removals misled consumers by advertising “Risk Insurance” without proof of coverage.
  • The complainant’s damaged television highlighted the disparity between the promise and the actual evidence.
  • ARB orders the removal of the claim from all advertising and instructs members not to accept it.

When a customer’s Hisense television was damaged during a long-distance move, EFI Furniture Removals’ website promise of “Risk Insurance” provided little protection.

The Advertising Regulatory Board concluded that the claim misled consumers and created an expectation that loss or damage during transit would be covered. The complainant stated that the television’s screen looked broken or malfunctioning.

He also mentioned that EFI refused to respond when he asked about the complimentary insurance offered. The Directorate noted that services like this involve some risk since household items must be packed safely, transported, and unpacked at the new destination.

The Directorate also pointed out that it cannot assess the quality of an advertiser’s services, only whether the advertising violates the ARB Code. Household items can be valuable or carry sentimental worth, and the claim that “Risk Insurance” is provided as a complimentary service likely suggests extra security to customers.

Advertiser fails to substantiate insurance claim

EFI Removals claimed it had sufficient transit insurance, but that it only covered fire, accident, collision, or overturning. The company stated that the complainant “signed off on this insurance cover when he accepted the quote” and noted customers were responsible for ensuring items are securely packed. The Directorate requested proof of the policy or a copy of the quotation document, but “no such copy was provided.”

The advertiser did not clarify whether the television that appeared damaged during the move was securely packed or if other factors contributed to the visible damage. EFI “has not explained why its ‘Risk Insurance’ would not cover this incident.”

ARB finds claim misleading

The Directorate observed that the term “risk insurance” suggests that insurance exists and that any damage will be covered. This has not been demonstrated. Clause 2 of Section II of the ARB Code states that “advertisements should not be framed in a way that abuses consumer trust or takes advantage of their inexperience, knowledge, or credulity.”

Clause 4.2.1 states that “advertisements should not contain any statements or visuals that, directly or indirectly, through omission, ambiguity, inaccuracy, exaggerated claims or otherwise, are likely to mislead the consumer.” The Directorate concluded that the claim “Risk Insurance” as it appears on the Advertiser’s website violates Clause 4.2.1 of Section II of the Code.

Sanction and consumer protection

The ARB ordered EFI Furniture Removals to retract its claim of offering “Risk Insurance.” Members of the ARB were instructed “not to accept any advertising from the advertiser if it claims to provide complimentary ‘Risk Insurance.’”

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Clickhere to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

ARB decision consumer protection EFI Removals insurance misleading claims
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Legal crackdown sees attorney struck off, another suspended, and fees pursued

    April 30, 2026

    Boxer joins SPAR in second ruling over hidden SIM card requirement in free data promotions

    April 29, 2026

    SPAR free data advert found misleading for failing to disclose SIM requirement

    April 25, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 10   +   7   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Human Rights
    5 Mins Read

    Court dismisses bid to remove News24 article on controversial Ekurhuleni toilet tender

    By Kennedy MudzuliMay 4, 20265 Mins Read

    The High Court in Johannesburg has dismissed Theuwedi Trading Enterprise and Nakampe Aubrey Moliwa’s bid to force News24 to remove an investigative article, ruling that the reporting was not defamatory.

    One in five domestic workers reports verbal, physical, or sexual abuse at work

    May 3, 2026

    Africa-centred rethink of international legal history gains ground

    May 2, 2026

    Schools urged to end exclusion of pregnant learners in new regulations

    May 2, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Court dismisses bid to remove News24 article on controversial Ekurhuleni toilet tender

    May 4, 2026

    One in five domestic workers reports verbal, physical, or sexual abuse at work

    May 3, 2026

    Africa-centred rethink of international legal history gains ground

    May 2, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.