Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

TVET college ordered to apologise for sharing personal information of employees

June 3, 2026

Judge calls for investigation into claims of body corporate capture in Maboneng

June 3, 2026

Company fails bid to escape contract clause buried in terms and conditions

June 3, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • TVET college ordered to apologise for sharing personal information of employees
  • Judge calls for investigation into claims of body corporate capture in Maboneng
  • Company fails bid to escape contract clause buried in terms and conditions
  • Tribunal dismisses Bogdanov’s PhD defence, upholds 10-year JSE ban
  • South Africa cannot afford to lag while youth nicotine addiction escalates
  • Evicted Durban tenants win urgent court order pending eviction challenge
  • Pension fund withdrawal benefits are determined by rules, not contributions
  • Teachers win compensation after decade of rolling contracts ruled unlawful
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » North West court orders Minister of Police to pay for two unlawful arrests
Law & Justice

North West court orders Minister of Police to pay for two unlawful arrests

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJanuary 21, 2025Updated:January 21, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Two victims of unlawful arrest and detention have been awarded damages by North West High Court in Mafikeng, with payouts totalling R390,000.

In the first case, farm worker Ditebogo Raymond Maritz, who was unlawfully arrested and detained from 8 September to 1 October 2018, has been awarded R350,000 in damages. Similarly, the Minister of Police, in a separate ruling, has been ordered to pay R40,000 to Felicia Longman for her unlawful arrest and detention.

In Maritz's case, the legal entanglement arose from his apprehension over alleged stock theft, a charge he vehemently denied throughout the court proceedings. Describing the circumstances of his arrest as duplicitous, Maritz, who was en route to seek employment at a local farm, found himself in a precarious situation after unwittingly trespassing on a private property. Encountering a security vehicle that fired a warning shot, Maritz and his companions fled the scene, only to be intercepted by police.

An officer identified only as Sergeant Metsi in the judgment testified on behalf of the police, claiming to have acted on information relayed by a local farmer, Anton Barnard, who accused Maritz of slaughtering his cow. However, Maritz countered that he was picked up far from the crime scene, arguing that the details of his arrest were wholly misrepresented.

Central to the court's decision was the absence of corroborating evidence to justify the police's claims of a lawful arrest. The court noted the failure to summon Barnard and other potential witnesses who could have clarified Maritz's actions leading up to the apprehension. Metsi's reliance on unverified reports was deemed seriously flawed, thereby undermining the legal foundation of the arrest.

The judgment reiterated the principle that the burden of proof lies with the defendant in instances of unlawful arrest, underlining that such an arrest is "prima facie unlawful" and constitutes a breach of constitutional rights. "The plaintiff's liberty was removed the moment he was apprehended," read the judgment.

The court also scrutinised the conditions of Maritz's detention, which were characterised as inhumane, with a lack of basic dignity. For a protracted 23 days, he endured overcrowded cells, insufficient food, and an absence of privacy, circumstances considered intolerable by the court.

The Longman case dated back to 12 May 2022, when she was arrested without a warrant alongside co-accused after allegations of kidnapping and assault surfaced. The court found that the arresting officer's justification was profoundly flawed, which resulted in the court declaring the arrest unlawful.

Longman testified to the squalid conditions of her detention, lamenting the stench, leaking latrines, and lack of sanitary facilities, conditions that pose significant questions about detainee treatment under police custody in South Africa.

The ruling stressed the importance of personal liberty, as enshrined in South African law, reaffirming that police must have legitimate grounds for suspicion before making an arrest. The case reiterated that an arrest lacking such justification not only infringes upon constitutional rights but cannot be justified after the fact. It also took into consideration the emotional and psychological impacts of wrongful arrests on individuals and set the R40,000 compensation as a reflection of this infringement on Longman's dignity.

#Conviction

Constitutional rights Minister of Police Police accountability Police detention Police misconduct Unlawful arrest Unlawful detention
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

TVET college ordered to apologise for sharing personal information of employees

June 3, 2026

Judge calls for investigation into claims of body corporate capture in Maboneng

June 3, 2026

Tribunal dismisses Bogdanov’s PhD defence, upholds 10-year JSE ban

June 3, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 1   +   6   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Regulatory Law
4 Mins Read

TVET college ordered to apologise for sharing personal information of employees

By Kennedy MudzuliJune 3, 20264 Mins Read

The Information Regulator has ordered Central Johannesburg TVET College to apologise after finding that employees’ personal information was unlawfully shared with unauthorised staff, in breach of several provisions of POPIA.

Judge calls for investigation into claims of body corporate capture in Maboneng

June 3, 2026

Company fails bid to escape contract clause buried in terms and conditions

June 3, 2026

Tribunal dismisses Bogdanov’s PhD defence, upholds 10-year JSE ban

June 3, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

R13,914 debt triggers sale of R380 000 home, transfer halted amid execution flaws

April 20, 2026

Understanding employee rights, workplace protections and grievance resolution in South Africa

June 8, 2025

Dead wife contradiction forces Nedbank to return repossessed Nissan Navara

May 29, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by