Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Consumer bought freedom from Eskom and got darkness instead

December 5, 2025

The African writer as prophet and critic: Es’kia Mphahlele’s legacy

December 4, 2025

SAHRC report finds WSU protest collapsed due to neglect, unlawful force, and failed oversight

December 4, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Consumer bought freedom from Eskom and got darkness instead
  • The African writer as prophet and critic: Es’kia Mphahlele’s legacy
  • SAHRC report finds WSU protest collapsed due to neglect, unlawful force, and failed oversight
  • Jacob Zuma’s court bid to avoid repaying R28.9 million in legal fees dismissed
  • Beleaguered Ditsobotla slammed for abusing court process in R7.5 million electricity debt case
  • Land Claims Court restores ancestral land to Bakgatla communities
  • Learning from experience: Applying lessons to Rand Water’s upcoming maintenance
  • North West High Court finds attorneys negligent for failing to act on client mandate
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » North West court orders Minister of Police to pay for two unlawful arrests
Law & Justice

North West court orders Minister of Police to pay for two unlawful arrests

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJanuary 21, 2025Updated:January 21, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Two victims of unlawful arrest and detention have been awarded damages by North West High Court in Mafikeng, with payouts totalling R390,000.

In the first case, farm worker Ditebogo Raymond Maritz, who was unlawfully arrested and detained from 8 September to 1 October 2018, has been awarded R350,000 in damages. Similarly, the Minister of Police, in a separate ruling, has been ordered to pay R40,000 to Felicia Longman for her unlawful arrest and detention.

In Maritz's case, the legal entanglement arose from his apprehension over alleged stock theft, a charge he vehemently denied throughout the court proceedings. Describing the circumstances of his arrest as duplicitous, Maritz, who was en route to seek employment at a local farm, found himself in a precarious situation after unwittingly trespassing on a private property. Encountering a security vehicle that fired a warning shot, Maritz and his companions fled the scene, only to be intercepted by police.

An officer identified only as Sergeant Metsi in the judgment testified on behalf of the police, claiming to have acted on information relayed by a local farmer, Anton Barnard, who accused Maritz of slaughtering his cow. However, Maritz countered that he was picked up far from the crime scene, arguing that the details of his arrest were wholly misrepresented.

Central to the court's decision was the absence of corroborating evidence to justify the police's claims of a lawful arrest. The court noted the failure to summon Barnard and other potential witnesses who could have clarified Maritz's actions leading up to the apprehension. Metsi's reliance on unverified reports was deemed seriously flawed, thereby undermining the legal foundation of the arrest.

The judgment reiterated the principle that the burden of proof lies with the defendant in instances of unlawful arrest, underlining that such an arrest is "prima facie unlawful" and constitutes a breach of constitutional rights. "The plaintiff's liberty was removed the moment he was apprehended," read the judgment.

The court also scrutinised the conditions of Maritz's detention, which were characterised as inhumane, with a lack of basic dignity. For a protracted 23 days, he endured overcrowded cells, insufficient food, and an absence of privacy, circumstances considered intolerable by the court.

The Longman case dated back to 12 May 2022, when she was arrested without a warrant alongside co-accused after allegations of kidnapping and assault surfaced. The court found that the arresting officer's justification was profoundly flawed, which resulted in the court declaring the arrest unlawful.

Longman testified to the squalid conditions of her detention, lamenting the stench, leaking latrines, and lack of sanitary facilities, conditions that pose significant questions about detainee treatment under police custody in South Africa.

The ruling stressed the importance of personal liberty, as enshrined in South African law, reaffirming that police must have legitimate grounds for suspicion before making an arrest. The case reiterated that an arrest lacking such justification not only infringes upon constitutional rights but cannot be justified after the fact. It also took into consideration the emotional and psychological impacts of wrongful arrests on individuals and set the R40,000 compensation as a reflection of this infringement on Longman's dignity.

#Conviction

Constitutional rights Minister of Police Police accountability Police detention Police misconduct Unlawful arrest Unlawful detention
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Consumer bought freedom from Eskom and got darkness instead

    December 5, 2025

    SAHRC report finds WSU protest collapsed due to neglect, unlawful force, and failed oversight

    December 4, 2025

    Jacob Zuma’s court bid to avoid repaying R28.9 million in legal fees dismissed

    December 4, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 7   +   10   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Regulatory Law
    4 Mins Read

    Consumer bought freedom from Eskom and got darkness instead

    By Kennedy MudzuliDecember 5, 20254 Mins Read

    A household bought a solar system advertised as off-grid only to find it could not function without Eskom, leaving them powerless and highlighting misleading advertising practices.

    The African writer as prophet and critic: Es’kia Mphahlele’s legacy

    December 4, 2025

    SAHRC report finds WSU protest collapsed due to neglect, unlawful force, and failed oversight

    December 4, 2025

    Jacob Zuma’s court bid to avoid repaying R28.9 million in legal fees dismissed

    December 4, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Consumer bought freedom from Eskom and got darkness instead

    December 5, 2025

    The African writer as prophet and critic: Es’kia Mphahlele’s legacy

    December 4, 2025

    SAHRC report finds WSU protest collapsed due to neglect, unlawful force, and failed oversight

    December 4, 2025
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2025 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.