The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has dismissed Absa Bank Limited’s appeal against a previous high court decision effectively declaring an Acknowledgment of Debt and Power of Attorney as unlawful.
The case emerged from a complex backdrop involving escalating debts, default agreements, and intricate interpretations of the National Credit Act (NCA). The legal proceedings commenced when the Johan Serfontein's family faced mounting financial difficulties stemming from a R5.2 million overdraft facility extended by Absa in July 2003.
Serfontein defaulted on his debt, the discussions between the parties evolved, leading to the signing of the Acknowledgment of Debt and Power of Attorney in March 2019. Both parties reached a settlement wherein the Serfonteins conceded their indebtedness and granted Absa the power to auction their property without a court order, aiming to expedite debt recovery.
However, the High Court in the Free State ruled against Absa, determining that the agreement contravened multiple provisions of the NCA, effectively rendering it void from the outset. Central to the court’s decision was the finding that the Acknowledgment of Debt and Power of Attorney was a supplementary agreement containing unlawful provisions; it included a clause that improperly excluded the NCA’s applicability and a power of attorney that allowed immediate execution against the mortgaged property.
The SCA strongly reaffirmed the high court's conclusions. The ruling acknowledged the profound purpose behind the NCA, which aims to promote consumer welfare and maintain fair practices in credit agreements. The court articulated that clauses allowing for immediate action against the property without judicial oversight fundamentally undermine the protective mechanisms envisaged by the NCA, leading to arbitrary deprivation of property.
Absa argued that the Acknowledgment of Debt and Power of Attorney was merely a negotiated settlement following the Serfonteins’ defaults. Nevertheless, the SCA found that the circumstances around the signing of the agreement illustrated undue pressure and coercion, effectively compelling the Serfonteins to affirm the terms as a means of avoiding financial ruin, including potential legal action and insolvency.
#Conviction
