Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Sea Point building plans declared unlawful, but luxury apartment development will continue

September 9, 2026

Protecting South Africa’s teachers starts with truly safe schools for everyone

September 8, 2026

Electoral Court dismisses UDF Party application for more time to nominate candidates

September 8, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Sea Point building plans declared unlawful, but luxury apartment development will continue
  • Protecting South Africa’s teachers starts with truly safe schools for everyone
  • Electoral Court dismisses UDF Party application for more time to nominate candidates
  • KZN High Court scraps paper court orders in major digital overhaul
  • Inmate death and alleged assaults at Kutama Correctional Centre spark series of lawsuits
  • Cape Town wants every dog and cat to have a permit under sweeping new by-law
  • Mandela’s legacy at stake as SA’s apex court hears fight over 29 priceless artefacts
  • Woman’s R2 million lawsuit over alleged botched pregnancy termination cleared for trial
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Scammed? You still owe, says Supreme Court of Appeal in EFT fraud judgment
Commercial Law

Scammed? You still owe, says Supreme Court of Appeal in EFT fraud judgment

When cybercriminals hijacked an email and diverted nearly R300 000, the court ruled that negligence was to blame for the loss
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJune 23, 2025Updated:June 23, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Hyundai Louis Trichardt lost nearly R300 000 to fraudsters in an EFT scam.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Key points: 

  • Failure to verify banking details led to costly consequences for the buyer in a cyber-fraud scheme. 
  • The court reaffirmed that the responsibility for secure payment lies with the payer. 
  • The ruling urges all businesses to double-check electronic transfers before clicking “send.” 

When a car dealership lost nearly R300 000 to online scammers, it thought the problem was someone else’s to solve.  

However, the Supreme Court of Appeal says otherwise, pinning the blame not on the crooks, but on the buyer who failed to double-check payment details. It’s a cautionary tale of how a simple click in the digital age can cost more than just money. 

The trouble started when Hyundai Louis Trichardt purchased two Nissan NP200s from Intengo Imoto, trading as Northcliff Nissan. Intengo emailed its invoice, complete with banking details. But by the time Hyundai paid, those details had been secretly altered by cybercriminals. 

This type of scam, known as Business Email Compromise, is a growing global threat where attackers intercept legitimate emails and reroute payments to fraudulent accounts. Despite its increasing prevalence, many businesses remain ill-prepared. 

In this case, the payment of R290,000 was successfully made; just not to Intengo. The funds vanished into a scammer’s account, and Hyundai, assuming the matter closed, considered its end of the deal done. But Intengo never received a cent. 

Court shifts the risk and the lesson 

When the issue went to court, a central question was who shoulders the loss when fraud targets a transaction mid-flight. 

The regional court initially ruled in favour of Intengo, citing Hyundai’s failure to verify the banking information it acted on. That ruling was later reversed by the Limpopo High Court in Thohoyandou. Eventually, the dispute landed before South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal. 

Their answer was unambiguous. “Payment into a different account…without verifying Intengo’s banking details, did not release Hyundai of its payment obligation,“ the Supreme Court concluded. 

#Conviction  

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel 

business risk Cybercrime digital payments EFT fraud Supreme Court of Appeal
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

The R751 500 retrenchment package that could rewrite liquidation law

September 7, 2026

Removal of material from disputed R225 million gold dumps halted

September 1, 2026

Justice Mokgohloa remembered as a fearless defender of dignity and equality

August 30, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 9   +   7   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Property Law
4 Mins Read

Sea Point building plans declared unlawful, but luxury apartment development will continue

By Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 9, 20264 Mins Read

The High Court in Cape Town declared two Sea Point building plan approvals unlawful but refused to stop the luxury apartment development.

Protecting South Africa’s teachers starts with truly safe schools for everyone

September 8, 2026

Electoral Court dismisses UDF Party application for more time to nominate candidates

September 8, 2026

KZN High Court scraps paper court orders in major digital overhaul

September 8, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

Western Cape judges open the Bar to foreign-trained lawyers in South Africa

September 2, 2026

Justice Department ordered to promote five senior secretaries with back pay

September 3, 2026

My soul is not happy: Sharpeville survivors take government to court over apartheid reparations

September 4, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by