Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

How March and March turned a deadline into a death sentence for migrants in South Africa

July 23, 2026

Municipal effort to charge student housing commercial rates ruled unlawful

July 23, 2026

Husband ordered to pay R106,211 monthly maintenance or face jail time

July 23, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • How March and March turned a deadline into a death sentence for migrants in South Africa
  • Municipal effort to charge student housing commercial rates ruled unlawful
  • Husband ordered to pay R106,211 monthly maintenance or face jail time
  • Lawyers face the music for poor court papers in asylum case, ordered to repay client
  • Two common mistakes can sink CSOS disputes before hearings begin
  • Only one of four WhatsApp allegations against Harmony Gold found defamatory
  • Augmenting apartheid memory through art, exhibition and lived experience
  • Labour Court stops municipal disciplinary hearing over AI citation concerns
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Scammed? You still owe, says Supreme Court of Appeal in EFT fraud judgment
Commercial Law

Scammed? You still owe, says Supreme Court of Appeal in EFT fraud judgment

When cybercriminals hijacked an email and diverted nearly R300 000, the court ruled that negligence was to blame for the loss
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJune 23, 2025Updated:June 23, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Hyundai Louis Trichardt lost nearly R300 000 to fraudsters in an EFT scam.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Key points: 

  • Failure to verify banking details led to costly consequences for the buyer in a cyber-fraud scheme. 
  • The court reaffirmed that the responsibility for secure payment lies with the payer. 
  • The ruling urges all businesses to double-check electronic transfers before clicking “send.” 

When a car dealership lost nearly R300 000 to online scammers, it thought the problem was someone else’s to solve.  

However, the Supreme Court of Appeal says otherwise, pinning the blame not on the crooks, but on the buyer who failed to double-check payment details. It’s a cautionary tale of how a simple click in the digital age can cost more than just money. 

The trouble started when Hyundai Louis Trichardt purchased two Nissan NP200s from Intengo Imoto, trading as Northcliff Nissan. Intengo emailed its invoice, complete with banking details. But by the time Hyundai paid, those details had been secretly altered by cybercriminals. 

This type of scam, known as Business Email Compromise, is a growing global threat where attackers intercept legitimate emails and reroute payments to fraudulent accounts. Despite its increasing prevalence, many businesses remain ill-prepared. 

In this case, the payment of R290,000 was successfully made; just not to Intengo. The funds vanished into a scammer’s account, and Hyundai, assuming the matter closed, considered its end of the deal done. But Intengo never received a cent. 

Court shifts the risk and the lesson 

When the issue went to court, a central question was who shoulders the loss when fraud targets a transaction mid-flight. 

The regional court initially ruled in favour of Intengo, citing Hyundai’s failure to verify the banking information it acted on. That ruling was later reversed by the Limpopo High Court in Thohoyandou. Eventually, the dispute landed before South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal. 

Their answer was unambiguous. “Payment into a different account…without verifying Intengo’s banking details, did not release Hyundai of its payment obligation,“ the Supreme Court concluded. 

#Conviction  

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel 

business risk Cybercrime digital payments EFT fraud Supreme Court of Appeal
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Jurisdiction of an arbitrator: Can an arbitrator declare a state contract invalid?

July 20, 2026

Family’s unwavering memory of unmasked gunman finally secures murder convictions

July 14, 2026

JSC recommendation to appoint Mpumalanga judge set aside by Supreme Court of Appeal

July 7, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 8   +   7   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Opinion
9 Mins Read

How March and March turned a deadline into a death sentence for migrants in South Africa

By Mandy Jovial and Sikhander CoopooJuly 23, 20269 Mins Read

Mandy Jovial and Sikhander Coopoo argue that South African law leaves no room for vigilante immigration enforcement, warning that unlawful campaigns against undocumented migrants threaten constitutional rights, deny access to healthcare and place vulnerable people at risk of violence.

Municipal effort to charge student housing commercial rates ruled unlawful

July 23, 2026

Husband ordered to pay R106,211 monthly maintenance or face jail time

July 23, 2026

Lawyers face the music for poor court papers in asylum case, ordered to repay client

July 23, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

Wedding rehearsal or workplace protest? Judge rules in favour of singing mineworkers

July 21, 2026

Mpumalanga records highest initiation death toll, prompting CRL Rights Commission inquiry

July 21, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by