Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Wedding ring comment in court office ends in failed R400 000 damages claim

February 8, 2026

Your pension protected as Pension Funds Adjudicator records 10 331 complaints

February 8, 2026

Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint

February 8, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Wedding ring comment in court office ends in failed R400 000 damages claim
  • Your pension protected as Pension Funds Adjudicator records 10 331 complaints
  • Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint
  • Lower-paid workers must take unpaid salary cases to the CCMA first, not Labour Court
  • Fund ordered to repay member after fees erase unclaimed R1 069 benefit
  • R1.4 million levy claim fails as High Court blocks sequestration of R2.5 million property
  • Employer ordered to pay R354 000 to driver left unpaid for three years after reinstatement
  • Anele Mda must apologise to Mbalula after court dismisses defamation appeal
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home ยป City of Joburg ordered to overhaul its controversial billing practices
Law & Justice

City of Joburg ordered to overhaul its controversial billing practices

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJanuary 29, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
The judgment declaring the City of Johannesburg's Protection and Security for VIP Risk Management System Policy unconstitutional has now kicked in. Picture: File
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg has ordered the City of Joburg to overhaul its controversial billing practices.

This ruling has its genesis in a battle by two Randburg residents against incorrect billing and dates back to May 2023. Anthea Verity Tarica and Katherine Anne Gascoigne sought urgent redress for the disconnection of electricity services stemming from a range of disputed charges. They alleged that the disputes were attributed to administrative failures and overbilling by the municipality.

The applicants contended that charges on their municipal account, originally opened in the name of Tarica's late husband, Jacques Tarica, were riddled with inaccuracies. They asserted that the City had continued billing them despite the death of Jacques Tarica in 2021, without rectifying alleged mistakes that dated back to 2014. The disputed amount reportedly reached R150,000, which the applicants maintained was largely due to incorrect meter readings and administrative errors.

The court heard claims of faulty meters and excessive charges culminating in a rebill that the applicants deemed exorbitant and unjustified. Tarica's appeals to the City for intervention had reportedly gone unanswered, leading to the decision to cut off essential services. This prompted immediate legal action to reconnect electricity, highlighting an escalating crisis in customer service and municipal responsiveness.

During the proceedings, the issues at hand included the legitimacy of charges that had allegedly prescribed, as well as whether the municipality had accurately communicated the basis for billing. The court found that the applicants had duly raised their disputes in line with the Municipal Systems Act, a legislation that governs the relationship between municipalities and residents regarding service delivery and billing, and ruled that any charges that became due before May 2020 were extinguished by prescription.

Judge D Mahon's ruling noted that while the first applicant, Tarica, made payments on non-disputed amounts, the City had failed to prove the accuracy of contested charges. The court referred to the principles outlined in previous legal cases which underscore the municipality's obligations to provide transparent billing and to address verifiable consumption accurately.

The municipality's counterapplication, seeking to compel her to open an account in her name and to hold her jointly liable for her late husband's municipal debts, was dismissed. The judge directed that the City open a new municipal account for Tarica, transfer relevant account charges, and ensure that prescribed debts were written off.

The City of Johannesburg has been given 30 days to implement the court's directives, including establishing a clear framework for handling billing disputes. This ruling is expected to benefit thousands of other residents who have faced similar billing challenges.

#Conviction

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Wedding ring comment in court office ends in failed R400 000 damages claim

    February 8, 2026

    Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint

    February 8, 2026

    Lower-paid workers must take unpaid salary cases to the CCMA first, not Labour Court

    February 7, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 1   +   1   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Civil Law
    4 Mins Read

    Wedding ring comment in court office ends in failed R400 000 damages claim

    By Kennedy MudzuliFebruary 8, 20264 Mins Read

    A workplace wedding ring remark led to a harassment case and a R400 000 lawsuit, but Limpopo judges rule the malicious prosecution claim fails.

    Your pension protected as Pension Funds Adjudicator records 10 331 complaints

    February 8, 2026

    Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint

    February 8, 2026

    Lower-paid workers must take unpaid salary cases to the CCMA first, not Labour Court

    February 7, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Wedding ring comment in court office ends in failed R400 000 damages claim

    February 8, 2026

    Your pension protected as Pension Funds Adjudicator records 10 331 complaints

    February 8, 2026

    Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint

    February 8, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.