Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up

October 15, 2026

Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’

October 15, 2026

Lease, R228 million tender and assassination plots in Matlala’s mounting legal battles

October 15, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up
  • Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’
  • Lease, R228 million tender and assassination plots in Matlala’s mounting legal battles
  • Elections analyst surprised but not shocked by ANC ballot ruling, Terry Tselane defends IEC
  • Fraud conviction set aside due to unregistered candidate attorney’s role in trial
  • Moepya commits IEC to ANC ballot changes and pledges review of nomination rules
  • Body corporate loses execution order after summons went missing in its own building
  • Malawi court blocks Bushiris’ extradition to SA, citing evidentiary and procedural defects
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Department failed to hear farmers before granting 20-year water licence for Lambert’s Bay
Environmental Law

Department failed to hear farmers before granting 20-year water licence for Lambert’s Bay

A judge found that affected landowners should have been allowed to oppose a groundwater licence before it was approved for Cederberg Municipality.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJuly 10, 2026Updated:July 10, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
A judge found the Department of Water and Sanitation should have heard affected farmers before granting a long term groundwater licence.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Department granted a 20-year water use licence without listening to affected farmers.
  • Landowners successfully challenged the approval after being excluded from the decision-making process.
  • The municipality can submit a new application while the current licence stays temporarily valid

Farmers who challenged the Department of Water and Sanitation's decision to grant Cederberg Municipality a long-term water use licence have won a significant legal victory after a judge found they were denied an opportunity to be heard before the licence was approved.

The High Court in the Western Cape ruled that the department acted unfairly when it granted the municipality permission to abstract groundwater from three boreholes on privately owned farmland near Lambert's Bay without first notifying the affected landowners or inviting them to make representations.

The licence, granted in March 2023, allows the municipality to abstract a combined 567 648 cubic metres of groundwater each year for 20 years.

Farmers challenge licence process

The applicants, the trustees of the ISW Van Zyl Trust and neighbouring farmer Hendrick Gideon Louw, approached the court after discovering that the licence had already been issued even though the boreholes are situated on their land.

The municipality had previously drawn groundwater from the boreholes under agreements with the landowners. Those agreements expired after the parties failed to agree on new compensation, but the municipality continued abstracting water while applying for a long-term water use licence.

The farmers argued that the department should never have approved the application without first consulting them and considering the effect continued groundwater abstraction could have on their farming operations.

Judge finds farmers were denied a fair hearing

Justice M Sher agreed, finding that the department failed to follow a fair administrative process before granting the licence.

The judge said, "A responsible authority may not dispense with a landowner's consent without them being notified of the application and being given a reasonable opportunity to make representations or submissions."

The department argued that the farmers were not entitled to be consulted because they were not registered lawful water users.

The court rejected that argument, holding that ownership of the land gave the applicants a direct interest in the licence application and that they should have been allowed to participate in the decision-making process.

Justice Sher said, "The responsible authority's failure to provide the applicants with a reasonable opportunity to make representations constituted a breach of the applicants' rights to procedurally fair administrative action."

Groundwater concerns should have been considered

The farmers also argued that continued groundwater abstraction had already affected their farming activities. They said several boreholes had failed since 2021, and increasing salinity had reduced water quality.

The court found that these concerns were relevant to the licence application and should have been considered before the department reached its decision.

Justice Sher said, "Common sense and fairness dictate that before granting a water use licence these steps should have been taken."

The judgment also noted that other nearby groundwater users may have been affected and should be considered if a fresh application is submitted.

Fresh application may be submitted

The court reviewed and set aside the water use licence but suspended its order for 18 months, or until the Department of Water and Sanitation decides a fresh application, whichever happens first.

This means the municipality may continue abstracting groundwater for Lambert's Bay while a new application is processed. If the municipality reapplies, the department must notify the affected farmers and consider any representations they make before deciding whether to grant another water use licence.

The respondents were ordered to pay the applicants' legal costs, including the costs of two counsel.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Department of Water and Sanitation farmers groundwater Lambert's Bay water use licence
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

I’m just an employee: Self-represented public servant challenges fairness of arbitration

September 4, 2026

Eskom ordered to tackle Kusile pollution with urgent 30-day environmental action plan

August 17, 2026

Constitutional Court blocks Shell’s Wild Coast seismic exploration rights

August 14, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 3   +   9   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Opinion
9 Mins Read

SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up

By Sikhander CoopooOctober 15, 20269 Mins Read

On 6 October 2026, the Equality Court in Gqeberha handed down a judgment that many…

Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’

October 15, 2026

Lease, R228 million tender and assassination plots in Matlala’s mounting legal battles

October 15, 2026

Elections analyst surprised but not shocked by ANC ballot ruling, Terry Tselane defends IEC

October 15, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

APRAV welcomes new RAF boss and rejects Road Accident Benefit Scheme revival plan

October 9, 2026

Business owner ordered to pay R200,000 for banning LGBTQ+ people from his shop

October 11, 2026

Tenant who withheld R1.4 million in rent, citing maintenance failures, ordered to leave property

October 13, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by