Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

The legal fault lines inside South Africa’s blended families and the cases reshaping family law

April 17, 2026

Secrets of the listeriosis outbreak are finally being forced into the open

April 17, 2026

Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut

April 17, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • The legal fault lines inside South Africa’s blended families and the cases reshaping family law
  • Secrets of the listeriosis outbreak are finally being forced into the open
  • Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut
  • Court orders Tshwane to fix school properties it sold without proper approvals
  • RAF cannot exclude undocumented foreign nationals from compensation claims
  • JSC overrules tribunal and finds Judge President Mbenenge guilty of gross misconduct
  • Firearm laws and court processes explained through the Julius Malema case
  • Asylum seekers are paying bribes to stay free, and the system is letting it happen
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Dismissal of employee must be backed by clear evidence, says Labour Court
Labour Law

Dismissal of employee must be backed by clear evidence, says Labour Court

Long-serving employee fired for minor policy breach get her job back
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJune 6, 2025Updated:June 6, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Cape Town Labour Court has found the termination of a long-serving employee to be substantively unfair.  

The case involved the Club Mykonos Langebaan Home Owners Association and Charmaine Williams, a supervisor dismissed in 2018 for a single incident of alleged misconduct. 

The dispute arose when Williams failed to report a homeowner's maintenance request through official company channels, instead relaying it informally to a colleague, A Le Fleur. Although this was found to be in breach of company policy, the Labour Court affirmed the original arbitration ruling, which held that the penalty of dismissal was excessive given Williams’s length of service and otherwise clean record. 

One-off breach, not gross misconduct 

Williams had been continuously employed at Club Mykonos since 1990, and permanently since 2008. Her employer, the Club Mykonos Langebaan Home Owners Association, dismissed her on 29 November 2018, alleging gross misconduct. The allegation stemmed from her role in a private maintenance arrangement involving a unit owner and another staff member. 

Company policy mandates that all maintenance work requested by unit owners be processed through Mykonos, generating income for the association and avoiding any form of internal competition. However, in this case, Williams simply passed on a homeowner’s request to Le Fleur, a maintenance worker, who completed the work during his own time and was paid R150. Williams received no personal gain from the transaction. 

The arbitrator ruled that although Williams should have reported the request, she had not solicited or facilitated work in a way that truly competed with her employer. Importantly, this was her first disciplinary offense in nearly three decades of service. The arbitrator determined that a final written warning was a more appropriate response than termination. 

Importance of context and fairness 

Mykonos challenged the arbitration outcome, arguing that Williams had breached her fiduciary duty and acted as a “middleman” in a transaction that compromised business integrity. They claimed the arbitrator erred by concluding she showed remorse and had not acted with malicious intent. 

However, the Labour Court disagreed, finding that the arbitrator’s decision was reasonable and rooted in a balanced view of the facts. The court emphasised that Williams’s misconduct was a single incident and that the trust relationship had not been irreparably broken. Her long service, clean record, and status as a primary breadwinner were all relevant considerations in determining that her dismissal was unfair. 

Reinstatement ordered with final written warning 

The arbitrator ordered Williams’s reinstatement with a final written warning valid for 12 months. Judge R Lagrange, who presided over the case, highlighted the importance of substantiating grounds for dismissal with clear evidence and properly contextualising employee conduct. He noted that procedural or interpretive errors in arbitration do not automatically justify overturning decisions that are otherwise fair. 

#Conviction 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel 

arbitration ruling disciplinary procedures employee rights employment law fiduciary duty HR policy Labour Court long-serving employee reinstatement South Africa Unfair dismissal workplace misconduct
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    The legal fault lines inside South Africa’s blended families and the cases reshaping family law

    April 17, 2026

    Secrets of the listeriosis outbreak are finally being forced into the open

    April 17, 2026

    Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut

    April 17, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 8   +   9   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Marriage Series
    5 Mins Read

    The legal fault lines inside South Africa’s blended families and the cases reshaping family law

    By Ann-Suhet MarxApril 17, 20265 Mins Read

    In the Marriage Series this week, Ann-Suhet Marx explores how legal disputes in blended families are forcing South African courts to rethink Rule 43, maintenance, and the protection of children.

    Secrets of the listeriosis outbreak are finally being forced into the open

    April 17, 2026

    Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut

    April 17, 2026

    Court orders Tshwane to fix school properties it sold without proper approvals

    April 17, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    The legal fault lines inside South Africa’s blended families and the cases reshaping family law

    April 17, 2026

    Secrets of the listeriosis outbreak are finally being forced into the open

    April 17, 2026

    Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut

    April 17, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.