Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises

July 25, 2026

African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children

July 25, 2026

Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa

July 24, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises
  • African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children
  • Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa
  • From rock samples to rocking the stage: Gavaza Mongwe advances to Mrs SA Top 30
  • Why the High Court sided with Ramaphosa in the Phala Phala impeachment battle
  • SCOPA chair Zibi says RAF’s declining performance triggered Parliament’s inquiry
  • D-day for law firm to repay R500 000 property deposit after holding money for nearly nine years
  • Dealer cannot dictate repairs for defective vehicles; BMW buyer wins full refund
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Energy drink advert plays dangerously with drinking and driving message
Regulatory Law

Energy drink advert plays dangerously with drinking and driving message

Commercial’s humour risks normalising a deadly behaviour in a country battling high drunk-driving fatalities.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliNovember 15, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • The ruling finds that the advert’s humour creates a risky impression by pairing positivity with drinking and driving.
  • Concerns were raised that viewers may misinterpret the message in a country facing extreme drunk-driving fatalities.
  • Broadcasters are advised not to air the commercial until the drinking and driving line is removed or revised.

A Switch Energy Drink commercial has faced criticism for linking humour to drinking and driving. This is a serious issue in a country where thousands die on the road each year.

The advert features a fake news interview where a man joyfully claims that “drinking and driving is awesome” after learning he could win a new car through a Switch promotion. Although he is discussing an energy drink, the ruling found that the framing “creates an overall positive association with the problematic statement,” which places risky language at the centre of its message.

For the complainant, the danger was clear. He argued that the line is “in extremely poor taste, trivialising a behaviour that is both illegal and socially destructive in South Africa.” He added that “the explicit wording normalises and makes light of drinking and driving,” which is commonly understood as consuming alcohol before driving. The complainant warned that the advert could mislead viewers, particularly vulnerable audiences, into thinking the brand supports or mocks behaviour responsible for tragic road deaths.

The Directorate agreed, highlighting the serious context in South Africa. It stated that “the Directorate must err on the side of caution when it comes to messages around drinking and driving,” pointing to the World Health Organization’s estimate that about 58 percent of South Africa’s road fatalities involve alcohol. Even with the anchorwoman’s repeated attempts to correct the misunderstanding, “Please don’t drink and drive!”, the ruling maintained that the commercial’s structure gives a dangerous impression.

Humour colliding with a life-and-death issue

Switch argued that the advert is clearly comedic and that audiences would understand the joke. The company stated viewers know Switch is a non-alcoholic drink and would realise the man is talking about an energy drink, not liquor. They contended that the line is intentionally absurd and that the anchorwoman’s interruption makes the intended message clear.

But the Directorate of the Advertising Regulatory Board rejected this defence, saying humour cannot outweigh potential harm. It found that “despite the humorous tone and approach,” the advert still places the phrase “drinking and driving is awesome” within a celebratory narrative where the character wins a prize. It stressed that “the commercial has an overall positive association with the problematic statement,” creating unacceptable confusion.

The Directorate also dismissed the notion that the advert promotes energy drinks as an alternative to alcohol. “Nothing that the character says communicates that drinking and driving is in fact, not awesome,” the ruling found. It pointed out that the advert never clarifies the distinction in a way that protects viewers from misunderstanding. The Directorate concluded that any message that could mislead consumers into thinking drinking and driving is acceptable “is not indicative of the necessary level of responsibility.”

“Any communication that could confuse consumers into believing that drinking and driving is condoned is not indicative of the necessary level of responsibility.”

Although Switch is not a member of the ARB, the ruling serves as guidance to member broadcasters and publishers, who have been instructed not to accept the advert in its current form. The message from the Directorate is that in a country where drunk driving destroys lives every day, even humour must not risk encouraging dangerous behaviour.

Conviction.co.za 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

 

 

advertising ethics consumer protection drinking and driving messaging Road safety Switch Energy Drink
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

A decade of income protection payments declared an error despite earlier promises

July 22, 2026

LPC rejects Teffo reinstatement rumours as charge sheet suggests acquittal on all six charges

July 21, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 3   +   8   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Consumer Protection Law
5 Mins Read

Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises

By Conviction Staff ReporterJuly 25, 20265 Mins Read

Consumers are being urged not to pay for promises of a quick exit from debt review after DCASA warned that changing debt counsellors does not end the legal process.

African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children

July 25, 2026

Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa

July 24, 2026

From rock samples to rocking the stage: Gavaza Mongwe advances to Mrs SA Top 30

July 24, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

Wedding rehearsal or workplace protest? Judge rules in favour of singing mineworkers

July 21, 2026

Mpumalanga records highest initiation death toll, prompting CRL Rights Commission inquiry

July 21, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by