Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Judge blocks Absa-linked company from selling pensioner’s home

September 11, 2026

Mugg & Bean franchise fired waitress, then used alleged racist remark to justify it

September 11, 2026

Eviction law does not protect temporary homeless shelters from court-ordered eviction

September 11, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Judge blocks Absa-linked company from selling pensioner’s home
  • Mugg & Bean franchise fired waitress, then used alleged racist remark to justify it
  • Eviction law does not protect temporary homeless shelters from court-ordered eviction
  • Heritage without human rights is an empty celebration in democratic South Africa
  • Property practitioners trapped by BEE rule that left the industry in confusion
  • Father who ignored maintenance orders faces jail if he fails to pay within 14 days
  • State loses bid to seize Ford Ranger allegedly used to transport 111kg cannabis
  • Stop running to court to avoid disciplinary hearings, Labour Court tells litigants
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Regulatory board finds Hollard’s cash back advertising misleading to consumers
Law & Justice

Regulatory board finds Hollard’s cash back advertising misleading to consumers

ARB rules that Hollard Insurance’s cash back promise lacks transparency, causing confusion among policyholders
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJune 4, 2025Updated:June 4, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
The Hollard Insurance Company Ltd has been found guilty of misleading advertising.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) has found The Hollard Insurance Company Ltd guilty of misleading advertising regarding its cash back benefit.  

The decision follows a consumer complaint alleging that the insurer’s promotional materials failed to clarify crucial eligibility criteria, leading to misinterpretations among longstanding policyholders. 

The dispute arose when a policyholder who had held life cover since 2006 attempted to claim a 10% cash back benefit advertised on Hollard’s official website. The promotion, which rewards customers with periodic payouts if their premiums remain up to date, was presumed to apply to all policyholders. However, the complainant was informed that the benefit was only applicable to policies issued after 2018, a crucial restriction not explicitly highlighted in the advertisement. 

Hollard defends its position 

Responding to the complaint, Hollard maintained that the misunderstanding stemmed from the consumer’s failure to examine the policy's terms and conditions thoroughly. The insurer asserted that its promotional materials adhered to legal guidelines and that the benefit was clearly outlined for policies issued post-2018. However, the ARB’s assessment revealed that Hollard’s advertising did not sufficiently distinguish between eligible and ineligible policyholders, leading to confusion. 

The ARB determined that Hollard’s placement of the cash back benefit details within the FAQ section contributed to the misleading nature of the advertisement. The regulatory body argued that longstanding customers could reasonably assume they qualified for the payout, given the absence of explicit exclusions. The ruling stated, “The reasonable long-standing consumer would therefore understand that if your policy is active, paid up to date, and not through Regent Life, the benefit applies.” This assumption, however, proved inaccurate for pre-2018 policyholders. 

Mandatory website amendments ordered 

In its final ruling, the ARB instructed Hollard to amend its website and marketing materials to prevent further confusion regarding the Hollard cash back benefit. The insurer is required to explicitly state that the benefit applies only to policies initiated from 2018 onward.   

#Conviction 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel 

Advertising Regulatory Board cash back benefit consumer protection financial services Hollard Insurance insurance transparency Misleading Advertising policyholder rights regulatory ruling
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Judge blocks Absa-linked company from selling pensioner’s home

September 11, 2026

Mugg & Bean franchise fired waitress, then used alleged racist remark to justify it

September 11, 2026

Eviction law does not protect temporary homeless shelters from court-ordered eviction

September 11, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 9   +   9   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Property Law
3 Mins Read

Judge blocks Absa-linked company from selling pensioner’s home

By Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 11, 20263 Mins Read

A pensioner has stopped an Absa-linked guarantee company from selling her home after the High Court in the North West rejected its application for execution.

Mugg & Bean franchise fired waitress, then used alleged racist remark to justify it

September 11, 2026

Eviction law does not protect temporary homeless shelters from court-ordered eviction

September 11, 2026

Heritage without human rights is an empty celebration in democratic South Africa

September 10, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

Lawyers ordered to pay from their own pockets after refusing to abandon hopeless appeal

September 9, 2026

My soul is not happy: Sharpeville survivors take government to court over apartheid reparations

September 4, 2026

Inside the share scheme that brought down former Miss SA Tatum Keshwar-Wheatley

September 5, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by