Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

South Africa cannot afford to lag while youth nicotine addiction escalates

June 2, 2026

Evicted Durban tenants win urgent court order pending eviction challenge

June 2, 2026

Pension fund withdrawal benefits are determined by rules, not contributions

June 2, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • South Africa cannot afford to lag while youth nicotine addiction escalates
  • Evicted Durban tenants win urgent court order pending eviction challenge
  • Pension fund withdrawal benefits are determined by rules, not contributions
  • Teachers win compensation after decade of rolling contracts ruled unlawful
  • Tshwane loses land expropriation battle, ordered to relocate Kanana Village residents
  • Sportscene lawyers ordered to pay costs after appeal delayed by flawed court record
  • Do South Africa’s archives serve justice or preserve historical injustice?
  • Turning your home into student accommodation could cost landlords dearly
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Regulatory board finds Hollard’s cash back advertising misleading to consumers
Law & Justice

Regulatory board finds Hollard’s cash back advertising misleading to consumers

ARB rules that Hollard Insurance’s cash back promise lacks transparency, causing confusion among policyholders
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJune 4, 2025Updated:June 4, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
The Hollard Insurance Company Ltd has been found guilty of misleading advertising.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) has found The Hollard Insurance Company Ltd guilty of misleading advertising regarding its cash back benefit.  

The decision follows a consumer complaint alleging that the insurer’s promotional materials failed to clarify crucial eligibility criteria, leading to misinterpretations among longstanding policyholders. 

The dispute arose when a policyholder who had held life cover since 2006 attempted to claim a 10% cash back benefit advertised on Hollard’s official website. The promotion, which rewards customers with periodic payouts if their premiums remain up to date, was presumed to apply to all policyholders. However, the complainant was informed that the benefit was only applicable to policies issued after 2018, a crucial restriction not explicitly highlighted in the advertisement. 

Hollard defends its position 

Responding to the complaint, Hollard maintained that the misunderstanding stemmed from the consumer’s failure to examine the policy's terms and conditions thoroughly. The insurer asserted that its promotional materials adhered to legal guidelines and that the benefit was clearly outlined for policies issued post-2018. However, the ARB’s assessment revealed that Hollard’s advertising did not sufficiently distinguish between eligible and ineligible policyholders, leading to confusion. 

The ARB determined that Hollard’s placement of the cash back benefit details within the FAQ section contributed to the misleading nature of the advertisement. The regulatory body argued that longstanding customers could reasonably assume they qualified for the payout, given the absence of explicit exclusions. The ruling stated, “The reasonable long-standing consumer would therefore understand that if your policy is active, paid up to date, and not through Regent Life, the benefit applies.” This assumption, however, proved inaccurate for pre-2018 policyholders. 

Mandatory website amendments ordered 

In its final ruling, the ARB instructed Hollard to amend its website and marketing materials to prevent further confusion regarding the Hollard cash back benefit. The insurer is required to explicitly state that the benefit applies only to policies initiated from 2018 onward.   

#Conviction 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel 

Advertising Regulatory Board cash back benefit consumer protection financial services Hollard Insurance insurance transparency Misleading Advertising policyholder rights regulatory ruling
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Evicted Durban tenants win urgent court order pending eviction challenge

June 2, 2026

Pension fund withdrawal benefits are determined by rules, not contributions

June 2, 2026

Teachers win compensation after decade of rolling contracts ruled unlawful

June 2, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 0   +   1   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Opinion
5 Mins Read

South Africa cannot afford to lag while youth nicotine addiction escalates

By Professor Lekan Ayo-YusufJune 2, 20265 Mins Read

Smoking and vaping among young South Africans have risen sharply over the past 15 years, raising concerns about nicotine addiction and delayed regulation.

Evicted Durban tenants win urgent court order pending eviction challenge

June 2, 2026

Pension fund withdrawal benefits are determined by rules, not contributions

June 2, 2026

Teachers win compensation after decade of rolling contracts ruled unlawful

June 2, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Online marketplace scams are becoming more sophisticated, warns fraud expert Ashwini Singh

May 26, 2026

Understanding employee rights, workplace protections and grievance resolution in South Africa

June 8, 2025

R13,914 debt triggers sale of R380 000 home, transfer halted amid execution flaws

April 20, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by