The Labour Court in Johannesburg has dismissed an application from Dwarsrivier Chrome Mine Proprietary Limited that sought to overturn an arbitration award related to the dismissal of a former employee Prince Tau. It found that Tau's dismissal was substantively unfair, ordering his reinstatement retrospectively.
According to mining industry safety protocols, explosive materials must be transported under strict conditions. However, on 6 May 2021, Tau was accused of improperly transporting explosives. Dwarsrivier Chrome Mine alleged that he allowed a colleague, Regina Phetla, to hand him an unlocked bag containing explosives, and that he transported these explosives using a vehicle that was not approved for such a purpose, contrary to regulations set forth in the Mine Health and Safety Act 29 of 1996.Â
The crux of the case hinged on whether Tau was aware that the bag contained explosives at the time of transport. Dwarsrivier Chrome Mine’s project manager, identified in the judgment only as Mr Bodenstein, testified that he witnessed Tau alongside his supervisor loading the bag onto the vehicle. His testimony indicated that the bag was closed with an elastic band rather than being securely locked, which is a compulsory safety measure for transporting explosives.Â
However, during the arbitration proceedings, Tau rejected the claims against him, asserting that he had acted unknowingly. Â He maintained that he had not heard any discussion concerning the bag and believed he was following standard protocols, having previously transported explosives correctly. He stated, "I was still learning".Â
This line of defence prompted Dwarsrivier Chrome Mine to challenge the findings of the commissioner, who had clearly favoured Tau's testimony in the arbitration ruling. The company presented multiple grounds for their review, all linked to the assertion that the commissioner made an unreasonable decision by believing Tau's account over theirs.Â
The Labour Court found that while there were conflicting accounts presented, the evidence did not strongly support the employer’s position. The commissioner's conclusion that Tau was unaware of the contents of the bag fell within the bounds of reasonable decisions, given that no corroborating evidence from Dwarsrivier Chrome Mine had sufficiently established Tau's awareness of transporting explosives.
In a crucial point, the court noted that had Phetla confirmed that she had informed Tau about the contents, or had supervisor been able to testify to that effect before his untimely death, the outcome could have been different. However, the lack of such evidence left the commissioner's initial ruling intact.
Subsequently, the Labour Court ruled against company, dismissing the review application and refraining from imposing any costs, as fairness was deemed paramount in this sensitive workplace matter.
#Conviction
