McDonald’s franchise owner MSA Devco (Pty) Ltd has been found liable for damages incurred by a customer, Gail Patricia Morrison, who sustained injuries after slipping on a wet floor in the Milnerton branch of the restaurant in February 2017.
The case, initiated as a delictual action by Morrison against the fast-food giant, revolved around the theme of negligence, or a lack thereof. Morrison reported experiencing severe injuries, including torn ligaments in her knee after slipping on a damp area of the restaurant floor. The court heard compelling evidence that suggested a failure on the part of McDonald’s to uphold its duty of care towards patrons.
During the trial, Morrison testified that she entered the restaurant with a colleague for a work-related meeting. As she ambled through the dining area, she suddenly lost her footing, falling hard as her foot slipped from beneath her. Notably, at the time of her fall, she claimed that there were no warning signs indicating a wet floor, an assertion corroborated by her colleague, Peter Winspear.
Winspear provided crucial testimony, detailing his observation of a cleaning staff member mopping the floor far from where Morrison fell. He further noted the absence of wet floor signage in the vicinity, countering the claims made by the restaurant that proper safety measures were in place. His evidence along with Morrisons suggested that the restaurant’s employees had not fulfilled their obligations regarding customer safety.
The defendant, MSA Devco, countered by admitting the incident occurred but denied having any prior knowledge of it. They claimed that Morrison must have acted negligently, arguing that she was expected to keep a lookout and adjust her walking pace. However, this defence was weakened by the evidence presented, which showed a lack of visible precautions that could have prevented the fall.
Throughout the proceedings, the court scrutinised the protocol followed by restaurant staff regarding wet floors. Testimony from McDonald's employees highlighted the procedures for mopping and placement of warning signs. Still, inconsistencies emerged; for instance, some employees claimed there were signs in place, while others agreed that none were visible where Morrison fell.
Ultimately, the court found in favour of Morrison, concluding that MSA Devco had negligently breached its duty of care. It was determined that had the appropriate safety measures been implemented such as effective signage and cordoning off wet areas the incident could likely have been prevented. The judge underscored the profound implications of this ruling for McDonald’s and similar establishments in terms of liability and customer safety.
In addition to ruling that Morrison’s claim was valid, the court also addressed the issue of a disclaimer notice at the restaurant entrance. Although the defendant argued that Morrison entered the premises at her own risk, thus absolving them from liability, the court was not persuaded. It concluded that effective communication of risks should be part of a restaurant's operational standards.
Morrison is set to be compensated for her injuries, with the court ordering MSA Devco to cover 100% of the damages she may establish going forward. The trial on quantum (damage assessment) was postponed.
#Conviction
