The KwaZulu-Natal High Court has reviewed a R28 million award in a cerebral palsy case.
Central to the decision is the court's complex evaluation of compensation arising from the profound challenges facing a young girl born with cerebral palsy due to alleged negligence during her birth.
The judgment delivered revisits compensation amounts exceeding R28 million awarded by the trial court in 2022, with the court ordering further actuarial calculations to refine the final sum. The crux of the matter revolves around the KwaZulu-Natal Health MEC, admitting liability for the child’s medical condition, which has left her permanently brain damaged and unable to engage in conventional education or employment. Her life expectancy is estimated at a significantly reduced 49.85 years.
The initial trial commenced in 2022, where Judge ZP Nkosi ruled in favour of the child’s mother, awarding damages for future medical expenses, loss of earnings, and general damages.
Upon appeal, the High Court granted condonation for the State's late notice of appeal and failure to submit necessary documentation within prescribed timelines. However, significant updates to the compensation framework were prompted by a series of contested financial claims regarding the child’s ongoing medical care and rehabilitative therapies.
In a systematic review of the trial court's findings, the High Court identified several pivotal areas where the original judgment may have miscalculated the necessary damages. Noteworthy among these was the trial court's acceptance of R4.88 million for a treatment known as 'Vitalstim', deemed unnecessary due to conflicting expert testimonies on its efficacy and safety.
The judges highlighted serious concerns regarding the acceptance of unverified medical treatments for children and ruled out payment for this particular intervention.
Additionally, the ruling scrutinised previously awarded costs regarding epilepsy medications, proposing a deduction of around R791,740, as the condition had been resolved. The High Court found similar discrepancies with future allowances for potential chest infections and unnecessary serum testing, further curtailing the judgment amount.
On the issue of caregiver training and equipment, overlapping costs for augmented and alternative communication devices were identified, which would ultimately be removed from the total budget. Not only were these adjustments necessary to maintain fairness in compensation, but they also underscored the importance of financial judiciousness when addressing long-term medical needs.
The court outlined that Munro Forensic Actuaries would be tasked within 30 days to recalculate damages based on life expectancy estimates, ensuring that future medical expenses reflect realistic projections. Such actuarial assessments are vital in determining what constitutes reasonable compensation, tailored to the child’s specific health requirements.
#Conviction
