Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

South African mining has made health and safety gains, but deep structural gaps remain

September 28, 2026

Companies cannot lawfully conclude private security contracts without PSIRA registration

September 28, 2026

Seven-year City of Joburg delay leaves property owner trapped in hijacked building

September 28, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • South African mining has made health and safety gains, but deep structural gaps remain
  • Companies cannot lawfully conclude private security contracts without PSIRA registration
  • Seven-year City of Joburg delay leaves property owner trapped in hijacked building
  • RAF ordered to compensate hairdresser who lost two fingers, then watched her clients disappear
  • Mamelodi child rape case sparks calls to make sex offender register public
  • Employers face 6 November deadline to challenge new foreign worker hiring rules
  • Bidvest fights to keep King Shaka Airport security contract in urgent court battle
  • Bishop Mosa Sono urges communities to unite after 17 killed in Wedela massacre
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » RAF must pay medical expenses despite Discovery Health coverage
Law & Justice

RAF must pay medical expenses despite Discovery Health coverage

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliFebruary 5, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Western Cape High Court has ordered the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to pay medical expenses even when covered by medical aid schemes.

The significant ruling delivered on 4 February 2025 ordered the RAF to compensate the estate of the late Anwar Esack for medical expenses incurred prior to his passing.

Esack, who sustained severe injuries in a car accident on 11 December 2015, lodged a claim against the RAF after it failed to compensate him for his medical expenses. Unfortunately, he died on 4 May 2020 while the matter was still pending. Following his death, his wife, Rahldeyah Esack, took over the claim as the executrix of his estate.

At the hearing, it emerged that most aspects of the claim had been settled, except for the past hospital, medical, and related expenses amounting to R115,436.14. The RAF contested liability, arguing the expenses had already been paid by Esack's medical aid scheme, Discovery Health.

However, Rahldeyah's counsel argued that the payment by the medical aid scheme was irrelevant in determining liability. They invoked the common law principle stipulating that a contract between a third party does not affect the rights and duties of other parties involved in litigation. Thus, it was contended that the RAF remained liable for compensation despite Discovery's payment of the medical costs.

The court was tasked with determining not only the liability of the RAF but also the implications of recent judicial interpretations surrounding medical aid benefits and their deductibility from claims against the Fund.

Judge LG Nuku ultimately ruled in favour of the the widow, asserting, “The deceased incurred past medical and hospital expenses. These were paid by the deceased’s medical-aid scheme, and I have been asked to assume… that the past hospital and medical expenses paid by the deceased’s medical aid scheme relate to prescribed minimum benefits”. His decision reinforced that the obligations of Discovery Health did not absolve the RAF of its responsibility to the deceased’s estate under the law.

In terms of compensation, the RAF was ordered to pay R935,477.28 for the deceased’s loss of earnings alongside the medical expenses. Payments must be made within 180 days, and the RAF will incur interest on the awarded amounts from 14 days after the order. Notably, the court mandated substantial legal costs to be covered by the RAF, reflective of the complexity involved in calculating damages related to a self-employed claimant.

#Conviction

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Companies cannot lawfully conclude private security contracts without PSIRA registration

September 28, 2026

Seven-year City of Joburg delay leaves property owner trapped in hijacked building

September 28, 2026

RAF ordered to compensate hairdresser who lost two fingers, then watched her clients disappear

September 28, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 2   +   7   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Opinion
6 Mins Read

South African mining has made health and safety gains, but deep structural gaps remain

By Dr Clarence TshiterekeSeptember 28, 20266 Mins Read

A decade of progress in mineworker health has cut tuberculosis and occupational lung disease, but persistent exposure risks and rising chronic illness reveal the industry’s next challenge.

Companies cannot lawfully conclude private security contracts without PSIRA registration

September 28, 2026

Seven-year City of Joburg delay leaves property owner trapped in hijacked building

September 28, 2026

RAF ordered to compensate hairdresser who lost two fingers, then watched her clients disappear

September 28, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

Bishop Mosa Sono urges communities to unite after 17 killed in Wedela massacre

September 27, 2026

High Court dismisses bid to revive complaint alleging Judge Unterhalter requested payment

September 25, 2026

Workers dismissed for cleaning solar panels with steel wool and orange bags may return to work

September 25, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by