Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Traffic officers guilty of asking motorist for money instead of issuing speeding ticket

March 11, 2026

Antenuptial contract confidently stands despite contested community of property claim

March 11, 2026

Court draws clear line on defamation and unproven corruption allegations

March 11, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Traffic officers guilty of asking motorist for money instead of issuing speeding ticket
  • Antenuptial contract confidently stands despite contested community of property claim
  • Court draws clear line on defamation and unproven corruption allegations
  • Labour Court clarifies when the 90-day deadline to refer a CCMA dispute begins
  • Flights for legal consultations not allowed where virtual meetings were available
  • The SONA of shadows: Why militarising our townships is a theatre of necropolitical power
  • Matric Luphondo challenge to prosecutors’ authority fails, trial to proceed
  • Transnet audit monopoly procurement clause declared unconstitutional
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » RAF must pay medical expenses despite Discovery Health coverage
Law & Justice

RAF must pay medical expenses despite Discovery Health coverage

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliFebruary 5, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Western Cape High Court has ordered the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to pay medical expenses even when covered by medical aid schemes.

The significant ruling delivered on 4 February 2025 ordered the RAF to compensate the estate of the late Anwar Esack for medical expenses incurred prior to his passing.

Esack, who sustained severe injuries in a car accident on 11 December 2015, lodged a claim against the RAF after it failed to compensate him for his medical expenses. Unfortunately, he died on 4 May 2020 while the matter was still pending. Following his death, his wife, Rahldeyah Esack, took over the claim as the executrix of his estate.

At the hearing, it emerged that most aspects of the claim had been settled, except for the past hospital, medical, and related expenses amounting to R115,436.14. The RAF contested liability, arguing the expenses had already been paid by Esack's medical aid scheme, Discovery Health.

However, Rahldeyah's counsel argued that the payment by the medical aid scheme was irrelevant in determining liability. They invoked the common law principle stipulating that a contract between a third party does not affect the rights and duties of other parties involved in litigation. Thus, it was contended that the RAF remained liable for compensation despite Discovery's payment of the medical costs.

The court was tasked with determining not only the liability of the RAF but also the implications of recent judicial interpretations surrounding medical aid benefits and their deductibility from claims against the Fund.

Judge LG Nuku ultimately ruled in favour of the the widow, asserting, “The deceased incurred past medical and hospital expenses. These were paid by the deceased’s medical-aid scheme, and I have been asked to assume… that the past hospital and medical expenses paid by the deceased’s medical aid scheme relate to prescribed minimum benefits”. His decision reinforced that the obligations of Discovery Health did not absolve the RAF of its responsibility to the deceased’s estate under the law.

In terms of compensation, the RAF was ordered to pay R935,477.28 for the deceased’s loss of earnings alongside the medical expenses. Payments must be made within 180 days, and the RAF will incur interest on the awarded amounts from 14 days after the order. Notably, the court mandated substantial legal costs to be covered by the RAF, reflective of the complexity involved in calculating damages related to a self-employed claimant.

#Conviction

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Traffic officers guilty of asking motorist for money instead of issuing speeding ticket

    March 11, 2026

    Antenuptial contract confidently stands despite contested community of property claim

    March 11, 2026

    Court draws clear line on defamation and unproven corruption allegations

    March 11, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 4   +   3   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Criminal Law
    5 Mins Read

    Traffic officers guilty of asking motorist for money instead of issuing speeding ticket

    By Kennedy MudzuliMarch 11, 20265 Mins Read

    The Limpopo High Court has convicted two traffic officers of corruption after finding they solicited money from a motorist to avoid issuing a speeding ticket.

    Antenuptial contract confidently stands despite contested community of property claim

    March 11, 2026

    Court draws clear line on defamation and unproven corruption allegations

    March 11, 2026

    Labour Court clarifies when the 90-day deadline to refer a CCMA dispute begins

    March 11, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Traffic officers guilty of asking motorist for money instead of issuing speeding ticket

    March 11, 2026

    Antenuptial contract confidently stands despite contested community of property claim

    March 11, 2026

    Court draws clear line on defamation and unproven corruption allegations

    March 11, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.