Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

South African mining has made health and safety gains, but deep structural gaps remain

September 28, 2026

Companies cannot lawfully conclude private security contracts without PSIRA registration

September 28, 2026

Seven-year City of Joburg delay leaves property owner trapped in hijacked building

September 28, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • South African mining has made health and safety gains, but deep structural gaps remain
  • Companies cannot lawfully conclude private security contracts without PSIRA registration
  • Seven-year City of Joburg delay leaves property owner trapped in hijacked building
  • RAF ordered to compensate hairdresser who lost two fingers, then watched her clients disappear
  • Mamelodi child rape case sparks calls to make sex offender register public
  • Employers face 6 November deadline to challenge new foreign worker hiring rules
  • Bidvest fights to keep King Shaka Airport security contract in urgent court battle
  • Bishop Mosa Sono urges communities to unite after 17 killed in Wedela massacre
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Supreme Court puts cork in CANTO vs CANTI wine trademark dispute
Law & Justice

Supreme Court puts cork in CANTO vs CANTI wine trademark dispute

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliFebruary 28, 2025Updated:February 28, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has reversed a previous court decision, upholding the appeal filed by Casadobe Props 60 (Pty) Ltd against Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi SpA concerning the similarity of trademarks in the wine industry. 

The dispute originated when Fratelli Martini, registered owner of the trademark "CANTI," sought to block Casadobe's application for the similar mark "CANTO." In 2024, a lower court ruled in favour of Fratelli, granting them an interdict to prevent Casadobe from using their chosen mark, arguing that the two brands could deceive or confuse consumers. 

However, the SCA's judgment articulated a different view. The court found that while both marks retained visual similarities, primarily due to their shared prefix "CANT," they ultimately distinguished themselves through the final letters "O" and "I". This crucial difference was deemed substantial enough to prevent consumer confusion.  

Timeline of the Case: 

2015: Casadobe begins using the "CANTO" trademark 
2024: Lower court rules in favour of Fratelli Martini 
February 2025: SCA overturns previous ruling 


Judge Mpho Mokgohloa, presiding over the appeal, stated that the average consumer, particularly in the context of purchasing wine, which typically commands more attentio, would likely discern between the two brands. 

Building upon established legal precedents in trademark law, the SCA highlighted that a consumer's likelihood of confusion should be evaluated in real-world contexts rather than through overly analytical legal scrutiny. The ruling referenced important cases that concluded similar trademark disputes, underscoring the need to focus on the overall impression generated by the marks as they appear in the market. 

Casadobe, a boutique wine estate located in the Durbanville wine valley, has operated under the unregistered trademark "CANTO" since its 2015 market introduction. The SCA's ruling allows Casadobe to continue using its mark, which is particularly significant given the backdrop of a burgeoning South African wine industry where brand differentiation is key. 

CANTI

Fratelli Martini's registered trademark "CANTI" wine. 

#Conviction

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Companies cannot lawfully conclude private security contracts without PSIRA registration

September 28, 2026

Seven-year City of Joburg delay leaves property owner trapped in hijacked building

September 28, 2026

RAF ordered to compensate hairdresser who lost two fingers, then watched her clients disappear

September 28, 2026

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Opinion
6 Mins Read

South African mining has made health and safety gains, but deep structural gaps remain

By Dr Clarence TshiterekeSeptember 28, 20266 Mins Read

A decade of progress in mineworker health has cut tuberculosis and occupational lung disease, but persistent exposure risks and rising chronic illness reveal the industry’s next challenge.

Companies cannot lawfully conclude private security contracts without PSIRA registration

September 28, 2026

Seven-year City of Joburg delay leaves property owner trapped in hijacked building

September 28, 2026

RAF ordered to compensate hairdresser who lost two fingers, then watched her clients disappear

September 28, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

Bishop Mosa Sono urges communities to unite after 17 killed in Wedela massacre

September 27, 2026

High Court dismisses bid to revive complaint alleging Judge Unterhalter requested payment

September 25, 2026

Workers dismissed for cleaning solar panels with steel wool and orange bags may return to work

September 25, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by