Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Why the High Court sided with Ramaphosa in the Phala Phala impeachment battle

July 24, 2026

SCOPA chair Zibi says RAF’s declining performance triggered Parliament’s inquiry

July 24, 2026

D-day for law firm to repay R500 000 property deposit after holding money for nearly nine years

July 24, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Why the High Court sided with Ramaphosa in the Phala Phala impeachment battle
  • SCOPA chair Zibi says RAF’s declining performance triggered Parliament’s inquiry
  • D-day for law firm to repay R500 000 property deposit after holding money for nearly nine years
  • Dealer cannot dictate repairs for defective vehicles; BMW buyer wins full refund
  • Hospital cannot hide behind ‘error of judgment’ defence after teacher suffered brain damage
  • How March and March turned a deadline into a death sentence for migrants in South Africa
  • Municipal effort to charge student housing commercial rates ruled unlawful
  • Husband ordered to pay R106,211 monthly maintenance or face jail time
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » SAHRC challenges business owner Dawood Lagardien over LGBTQ+ discrimination signage
Regulatory Law

SAHRC challenges business owner Dawood Lagardien over LGBTQ+ discrimination signage

Equality Court to hear case against Dawood Lagardien for alleged hate speech and discriminatory practices 
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterMay 25, 2025Updated:May 25, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
The signage outside Lagardien's business. Picture: Facebook
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) has announced it will proceed with legal action against Dawood Lagardien, a businessman accused of discriminatory practices against the LGBTQ+ community.  

The case centres on a signage displayed outside Lagardien’s establishment, which boldly states, “LGBTQ not welcome at LaGardi – Save our children.” This message is seen as a direct attempt to exclude individuals identifying as LGBTQ+ from accessing services offered by his business. 

In addition to the signage, Lagardien has allegedly played an active role in inciting discrimination through the creation and management of a WhatsApp group titled “Our Rights – anti LGBTQ+.” This group reportedly disseminates harmful statements and materials targeting LGBTQ+ individuals, raising significant concerns regarding hate speech and harassment. 

Legal ramifications and SAHRC’s role 

Following a thorough evaluation of the complaints lodged against Lagardien, the SAHRC has concluded that his actions potentially violate sections 10 and 11 of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act, 2000. The commission emphasises that such behavior undermines the core values of equality and non-discrimination foundational to South African society. 

A hearing is set to take place at the East London High Court, functioning as an Equality Court, on 26 May 2025 from 9.30am. The venue is located at 4 Warren Road, Vincent, East London, 5217. “This hearing is not just a legal formality, it stands as a crucial test for the country’s commitment to promoting equality and protecting the rights of all citizens, regardless of sexual orientation,” the SAHRC said in a statement. 

#Conviction 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel 

 

anti-discrimination Dawood Lagardien Equality Court Hate Speech Human Rights legal action LGBTQ+ rights PEPUDA Regulatory Law SAHRC South Africa
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

Related Posts

How March and March turned a deadline into a death sentence for migrants in South Africa

July 23, 2026

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

A decade of income protection payments declared an error despite earlier promises

July 22, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 5   +   4   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Constitutional Law
6 Mins Read

Why the High Court sided with Ramaphosa in the Phala Phala impeachment battle

By Kennedy MudzuliJuly 24, 20266 Mins Read

The High Court’s decision to halt Parliament’s Phala Phala impeachment inquiry was not a finding that President Cyril Ramaphosa is innocent. Instead, the majority ruled that serious legal questions about the independent panel’s report must be resolved before public impeachment hearings can proceed, citing the rule of law, constitutional fairness and the risk of irreversible harm.

SCOPA chair Zibi says RAF’s declining performance triggered Parliament’s inquiry

July 24, 2026

D-day for law firm to repay R500 000 property deposit after holding money for nearly nine years

July 24, 2026

Dealer cannot dictate repairs for defective vehicles; BMW buyer wins full refund

July 24, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

Wedding rehearsal or workplace protest? Judge rules in favour of singing mineworkers

July 21, 2026

Mpumalanga records highest initiation death toll, prompting CRL Rights Commission inquiry

July 21, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by