Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

The legal fault lines inside South Africa’s blended families and the cases reshaping family law

April 17, 2026

Secrets of the listeriosis outbreak are finally being forced into the open

April 17, 2026

Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut

April 17, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • The legal fault lines inside South Africa’s blended families and the cases reshaping family law
  • Secrets of the listeriosis outbreak are finally being forced into the open
  • Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut
  • Court orders Tshwane to fix school properties it sold without proper approvals
  • RAF cannot exclude undocumented foreign nationals from compensation claims
  • JSC overrules tribunal and finds Judge President Mbenenge guilty of gross misconduct
  • Firearm laws and court processes explained through the Julius Malema case
  • Asylum seekers are paying bribes to stay free, and the system is letting it happen
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Advertising watchdog sanctions Chas Everitt over billboard referring to estate agents as ‘birdies’
Regulatory Law

Advertising watchdog sanctions Chas Everitt over billboard referring to estate agents as ‘birdies’

The ARB rules that the term “birdies” objectifies women and undermines their professional standing
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJune 18, 2025Updated:June 18, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
The Advertising Regulatory Board has ruled against this billboard advertisement by Chas Everitt International Property Group.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Key Points

  • The ARB found the term “birdies” infantilising and in breach of gender portrayal standards.
  • Chas Everitt defended the ad as a golf pun but is not bound by ARB jurisdiction.
  • Members have been directed to reject the ad in its current form.

The Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) has issued a directive to its members prohibiting the acceptance or publication of a billboard advertisement by Chas Everitt International Property Group. The ad, which refers to two female estate agents as “birdies,” was found to perpetuate gender stereotypes and diminish the agents’ professional credibility.

The billboard, displayed near a golf estate, features the tagline “Not your average birdies” without any reference to real estate services. A consumer complaint argued that the term implies women are decorative or trivial unless deemed “above average,” and that the ad fails to acknowledge the agents’ professional roles. A community WhatsApp group reportedly echoed widespread disapproval of the ad’s tone.

Advertiser’s defence: A play on words

In a legal response submitted by Nochumsohn Pretorius Attorneys, Chas Everitt stated that it is not a member of the ARB and does not submit to its jurisdiction. Nonetheless, the company defended the ad as a light-hearted pun, referencing the golfing term “birdie” (a score of one under par). They argued that the term was not intended to offend and likened it to the informal use of “bloke” for men.

ARB’s ruling: Language and cultural impact

The ARB Directorate evaluated the ad under Clause 3.5 (Unacceptable Gender Portrayal) and Clause 1 (Offensive Advertising) of the Code of Advertising Practice. It found that the term “birdie,” even when used playfully, objectifies and infantilises the women depicted. Unlike “bloke,” the term “bird” has a documented history of trivialising women.

The Directorate cited a UK court ruling that found the term “birds” inherently sexist and referenced commentary fromThe Guardian andThe Independent highlighting the term’s problematic connotations. It concluded that the ad undermines the professional dignity of the women portrayed and reinforces harmful gender norms.

Final outcome

Although Chas Everitt is not bound by ARB rulings, the Directorate issued the decision as guidance for its members. It concluded: “The use of the term ‘birdie’ constitutes negative gender portrayal. It objectifies and infantilises women, undermining their professional dignity and reinforcing harmful stereotypes.”

Members of the ARB have been instructed not to accept or disseminate the advertisement in its current form.

#Conviction

Get your news on the go. Clickhereto follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel

advertising regulation ARB ruling gender stereotypes media accountability professional representation
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut

    April 17, 2026

    Municipal billing errors leave homeowners paying for the wrong property

    April 15, 2026

    Namibian B Juris degree falls short of South African LLB equivalence

    April 13, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 8   +   7   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Marriage Series
    5 Mins Read

    The legal fault lines inside South Africa’s blended families and the cases reshaping family law

    By Ann-Suhet MarxApril 17, 20265 Mins Read

    In the Marriage Series this week, Ann-Suhet Marx explores how legal disputes in blended families are forcing South African courts to rethink Rule 43, maintenance, and the protection of children.

    Secrets of the listeriosis outbreak are finally being forced into the open

    April 17, 2026

    Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut

    April 17, 2026

    Court orders Tshwane to fix school properties it sold without proper approvals

    April 17, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    The legal fault lines inside South Africa’s blended families and the cases reshaping family law

    April 17, 2026

    Secrets of the listeriosis outbreak are finally being forced into the open

    April 17, 2026

    Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut

    April 17, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.