Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

South Africa cannot afford to lag while youth nicotine addiction escalates

June 2, 2026

Evicted Durban tenants win urgent court order pending eviction challenge

June 2, 2026

Pension fund withdrawal benefits are determined by rules, not contributions

June 2, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • South Africa cannot afford to lag while youth nicotine addiction escalates
  • Evicted Durban tenants win urgent court order pending eviction challenge
  • Pension fund withdrawal benefits are determined by rules, not contributions
  • Teachers win compensation after decade of rolling contracts ruled unlawful
  • Tshwane loses land expropriation battle, ordered to relocate Kanana Village residents
  • Sportscene lawyers ordered to pay costs after appeal delayed by flawed court record
  • Do South Africa’s archives serve justice or preserve historical injustice?
  • Turning your home into student accommodation could cost landlords dearly
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Advertising watchdog sanctions Chas Everitt over billboard referring to estate agents as ‘birdies’
Regulatory Law

Advertising watchdog sanctions Chas Everitt over billboard referring to estate agents as ‘birdies’

The ARB rules that the term “birdies” objectifies women and undermines their professional standing
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJune 18, 2025Updated:June 18, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
The Advertising Regulatory Board has ruled against this billboard advertisement by Chas Everitt International Property Group.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Key Points 

  • The ARB found the term “birdies” infantilising and in breach of gender portrayal standards.
  • Chas Everitt defended the ad as a golf pun but is not bound by ARB jurisdiction. 
  • Members have been directed to reject the ad in its current form. 

The Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) has issued a directive to its members prohibiting the acceptance or publication of a billboard advertisement by Chas Everitt International Property Group. The ad, which refers to two female estate agents as “birdies,” was found to perpetuate gender stereotypes and diminish the agents’ professional credibility. 

The billboard, displayed near a golf estate, features the tagline “Not your average birdies” without any reference to real estate services. A consumer complaint argued that the term implies women are decorative or trivial unless deemed “above average,” and that the ad fails to acknowledge the agents’ professional roles. A community WhatsApp group reportedly echoed widespread disapproval of the ad’s tone. 

Advertiser’s defence: A play on words 

In a legal response submitted by Nochumsohn Pretorius Attorneys, Chas Everitt stated that it is not a member of the ARB and does not submit to its jurisdiction. Nonetheless, the company defended the ad as a light-hearted pun, referencing the golfing term “birdie” (a score of one under par). They argued that the term was not intended to offend and likened it to the informal use of “bloke” for men. 

ARB’s ruling: Language and cultural impact 

The ARB Directorate evaluated the ad under Clause 3.5 (Unacceptable Gender Portrayal) and Clause 1 (Offensive Advertising) of the Code of Advertising Practice. It found that the term “birdie,” even when used playfully, objectifies and infantilises the women depicted. Unlike “bloke,” the term “bird” has a documented history of trivialising women. 

The Directorate cited a UK court ruling that found the term “birds” inherently sexist and referenced commentary from The Guardian and The Independent highlighting the term’s problematic connotations. It concluded that the ad undermines the professional dignity of the women portrayed and reinforces harmful gender norms. 

Final outcome 

Although Chas Everitt is not bound by ARB rulings, the Directorate issued the decision as guidance for its members. It concluded: “The use of the term ‘birdie’ constitutes negative gender portrayal. It objectifies and infantilises women, undermining their professional dignity and reinforcing harmful stereotypes.” 

Members of the ARB have been instructed not to accept or disseminate the advertisement in its current form. 

#Conviction     

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel     

advertising regulation ARB ruling gender stereotypes media accountability professional representation
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Pension fund withdrawal benefits are determined by rules, not contributions

June 2, 2026

Children and girlfriend awarded R3.5m pension payout while estranged wife receives nothing

May 28, 2026

Employers must treat retirement contributions like wages, says MIBCO’s Paulos Masemola

May 28, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 1   +   4   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Opinion
5 Mins Read

South Africa cannot afford to lag while youth nicotine addiction escalates

By Professor Lekan Ayo-YusufJune 2, 20265 Mins Read

Smoking and vaping among young South Africans have risen sharply over the past 15 years, raising concerns about nicotine addiction and delayed regulation.

Evicted Durban tenants win urgent court order pending eviction challenge

June 2, 2026

Pension fund withdrawal benefits are determined by rules, not contributions

June 2, 2026

Teachers win compensation after decade of rolling contracts ruled unlawful

June 2, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Online marketplace scams are becoming more sophisticated, warns fraud expert Ashwini Singh

May 26, 2026

Understanding employee rights, workplace protections and grievance resolution in South Africa

June 8, 2025

R13,914 debt triggers sale of R380 000 home, transfer halted amid execution flaws

April 20, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by