Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Sectional title schemes explained: Is that parking bay really for you?

September 11, 2026

ConCourt rules KZN government has the final say on removing traditional leaders

September 11, 2026

Sanlam fraud debarment overturned after hearing notice sent to wrong email address

September 11, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Sectional title schemes explained: Is that parking bay really for you?
  • ConCourt rules KZN government has the final say on removing traditional leaders
  • Sanlam fraud debarment overturned after hearing notice sent to wrong email address
  • Facebook Marketplace ‘Sganai’ scam syndicate gets life and 150 years behind bars
  • Judge blocks Absa-linked company from selling pensioner’s home
  • Mugg & Bean franchise fired waitress, then used alleged racist remark to justify it
  • Eviction law does not protect temporary homeless shelters from court-ordered eviction
  • Heritage without human rights is an empty celebration in democratic South Africa
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Baby savers court battle highlights fight to save abandoned newborns and protect their right to life
Human Rights

Baby savers court battle highlights fight to save abandoned newborns and protect their right to life

High Court case underscores the tension between child protection laws and life-saving interventions for newborns 
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterAugust 25, 2025Updated:August 25, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Court asked to extend interim protection for Baby Savers SA and Door of Hope. 
  • Dispute centres on baby saver devices declared illegal by the Department of Social Development in 2023. 
  • At least 3 500 babies abandoned each year, with two out of three found dead. 

The North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria is on 25 August 2025 hearing an urgent matter that could determine the future of baby saver devices in South Africa. Baby Savers SA, together with the Door of Hope Children’s Mission, are challenging the Department of Social Development over a directive that declared these devices illegal. 

A baby saver device is a specially designed safe box or cradle, often attached to a hospital or children’s care facility wall, where a mother can anonymously and safely leave her newborn. The device ensures the baby is immediately attended to by trained staff, giving children a chance at life who might otherwise be abandoned in unsafe locations. 

The dispute began in 2024, when the department threatened to close Door of Hope and remove the 57 children in its care, citing its use of a baby saver device. The organisation refused, saying the device had saved countless newborn lives since its installation. 

Human Cost and Legal Stakes 

For many South Africans, the story is deeply personal. Around 3,500 babies are abandoned every year, with two out of three found dead in unsafe locations like pit latrines, dumpsters, and open fields. Baby Savers SA and Door of Hope argue that banning these devices puts newborns at extreme risk, disregarding the first and most basic right, the right to life. 

The DSD maintains that baby abandonment denies children their right to a family name and cultural heritage, but the applicants insist that life must come first. “Without life, there can be no talk of family or culture,” they say. 

The legal battle also threatens the survival of Door of Hope, which has provided a safe haven for Johannesburg’s most vulnerable children for more than two decades. Despite the temporary court order in its favour, the organisation has been denied state funding, putting its ongoing operations at risk. 

Baby Savers as a Lifeline 

Advocates stress that baby saver devices are never an easy option, but a last resort for desperate mothers. “Unsafe abandonment should never be an option,” Baby Savers SA emphasises. 

As the court deliberates on extending the temporary order, the outcome could shape South Africa’s child protection framework for years to come. For the thousands of babies whose lives hang in the balance, the decision is more than a legal technicality, it is a matter of survival. 

Conviction.co.za 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.    

 

Baby saver devices Baby Savers SA child protection Door of Hope Human Rights
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

Related Posts

Eviction law does not protect temporary homeless shelters from court-ordered eviction

September 11, 2026

Heritage without human rights is an empty celebration in democratic South Africa

September 10, 2026

My soul is not happy: Sharpeville survivors take government to court over apartheid reparations

September 4, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 4   +   4   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Sectional Title Law
4 Mins Read

Sectional title schemes explained: Is that parking bay really for you?

By Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 11, 20264 Mins Read

Parking disputes are common in sectional title schemes. Here’s how South African law determines whether a parking bay is an exclusive use area or common property.

ConCourt rules KZN government has the final say on removing traditional leaders

September 11, 2026

Sanlam fraud debarment overturned after hearing notice sent to wrong email address

September 11, 2026

Facebook Marketplace ‘Sganai’ scam syndicate gets life and 150 years behind bars

September 11, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

Lawyers ordered to pay from their own pockets after refusing to abandon hopeless appeal

September 9, 2026

My soul is not happy: Sharpeville survivors take government to court over apartheid reparations

September 4, 2026

Mugg & Bean franchise fired waitress, then used alleged racist remark to justify it

September 11, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by