Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut

April 17, 2026

Court orders Tshwane to fix school properties it sold without proper approvals

April 17, 2026

RAF cannot exclude undocumented foreign nationals from compensation claims

April 17, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut
  • Court orders Tshwane to fix school properties it sold without proper approvals
  • RAF cannot exclude undocumented foreign nationals from compensation claims
  • JSC overrules tribunal and finds Judge President Mbenenge guilty of gross misconduct
  • Firearm laws and court processes explained through the Julius Malema case
  • Asylum seekers are paying bribes to stay free, and the system is letting it happen
  • Dignity SA asks Pretoria High Court to open a lawful path for assisted dying
  • NHI public participation challenge tests Parliament’s lawmaking process
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Baby savers court battle highlights fight to save abandoned newborns and protect their right to life
Human Rights

Baby savers court battle highlights fight to save abandoned newborns and protect their right to life

High Court case underscores the tension between child protection laws and life-saving interventions for newborns
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterAugust 25, 2025Updated:August 25, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Court asked to extend interim protection for Baby Savers SA and Door of Hope.
  • Dispute centres on baby saver devices declared illegal by the Department of Social Development in 2023.
  • At least 3 500 babies abandoned each year, with two out of three found dead.

The North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria is on 25 August 2025 hearing an urgent matter that could determine the future of baby saver devices in South Africa. Baby Savers SA, together with the Door of Hope Children’s Mission, are challenging the Department of Social Development over a directive that declared these devices illegal.

A baby saver device is a specially designed safe box or cradle, often attached to a hospital or children’s care facility wall, where a mother can anonymously and safely leave her newborn. The device ensures the baby is immediately attended to by trained staff, giving children a chance at life who might otherwise be abandoned in unsafe locations.

The dispute began in 2024, when the department threatened to close Door of Hope and remove the 57 children in its care, citing its use of a baby saver device. The organisation refused, saying the device had saved countless newborn lives since its installation.

Human Cost and Legal Stakes

For many South Africans, the story is deeply personal. Around 3,500 babies are abandoned every year, with two out of three found dead in unsafe locations like pit latrines, dumpsters, and open fields. Baby Savers SA and Door of Hope argue that banning these devices puts newborns at extreme risk, disregarding the first and most basic right, the right to life.

The DSD maintains that baby abandonment denies children their right to a family name and cultural heritage, but the applicants insist that life must come first. “Without life, there can be no talk of family or culture,” they say.

The legal battle also threatens the survival of Door of Hope, which has provided a safe haven for Johannesburg’s most vulnerable children for more than two decades. Despite the temporary court order in its favour, the organisation has been denied state funding, putting its ongoing operations at risk.

Baby Savers as a Lifeline

Advocates stress that baby saver devices are never an easy option, but a last resort for desperate mothers. “Unsafe abandonment should never be an option,” Baby Savers SA emphasises.

As the court deliberates on extending the temporary order, the outcome could shape South Africa’s child protection framework for years to come. For the thousands of babies whose lives hang in the balance, the decision is more than a legal technicality, it is a matter of survival.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Clickhereto follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Baby saver devices Baby Savers SA child protection Door of Hope Human Rights
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

    Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

    Related Posts

    Asylum seekers are paying bribes to stay free, and the system is letting it happen

    April 16, 2026

    Dignity SA asks Pretoria High Court to open a lawful path for assisted dying

    April 16, 2026

    From remembrance to repair: Why the legacy of slavery still demands action today

    April 14, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 1   +   9   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Regulatory Law
    4 Mins Read

    Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut

    By Kennedy MudzuliApril 17, 20264 Mins Read

    The High Court in Pretoria ordered a mall to reopen a locked shop after finding that the landlord unlawfully dispossessed the tenant without following legal process.

    Court orders Tshwane to fix school properties it sold without proper approvals

    April 17, 2026

    RAF cannot exclude undocumented foreign nationals from compensation claims

    April 17, 2026

    JSC overrules tribunal and finds Judge President Mbenenge guilty of gross misconduct

    April 16, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Tenant wins urgent court battle after landlord chains and padlocks shop shut

    April 17, 2026

    Court orders Tshwane to fix school properties it sold without proper approvals

    April 17, 2026

    RAF cannot exclude undocumented foreign nationals from compensation claims

    April 17, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.