Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students

July 26, 2026

Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises

July 25, 2026

African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children

July 25, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students
  • Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises
  • African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children
  • Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa
  • From rock samples to rocking the stage: Gavaza Mongwe advances to Mrs SA Top 30
  • Why the High Court sided with Ramaphosa in the Phala Phala impeachment battle
  • SCOPA chair Zibi says RAF’s declining performance triggered Parliament’s inquiry
  • D-day for law firm to repay R500 000 property deposit after holding money for nearly nine years
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Baby savers court battle highlights fight to save abandoned newborns and protect their right to life
Human Rights

Baby savers court battle highlights fight to save abandoned newborns and protect their right to life

High Court case underscores the tension between child protection laws and life-saving interventions for newborns 
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterAugust 25, 2025Updated:August 25, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Court asked to extend interim protection for Baby Savers SA and Door of Hope. 
  • Dispute centres on baby saver devices declared illegal by the Department of Social Development in 2023. 
  • At least 3 500 babies abandoned each year, with two out of three found dead. 

The North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria is on 25 August 2025 hearing an urgent matter that could determine the future of baby saver devices in South Africa. Baby Savers SA, together with the Door of Hope Children’s Mission, are challenging the Department of Social Development over a directive that declared these devices illegal. 

A baby saver device is a specially designed safe box or cradle, often attached to a hospital or children’s care facility wall, where a mother can anonymously and safely leave her newborn. The device ensures the baby is immediately attended to by trained staff, giving children a chance at life who might otherwise be abandoned in unsafe locations. 

The dispute began in 2024, when the department threatened to close Door of Hope and remove the 57 children in its care, citing its use of a baby saver device. The organisation refused, saying the device had saved countless newborn lives since its installation. 

Human Cost and Legal Stakes 

For many South Africans, the story is deeply personal. Around 3,500 babies are abandoned every year, with two out of three found dead in unsafe locations like pit latrines, dumpsters, and open fields. Baby Savers SA and Door of Hope argue that banning these devices puts newborns at extreme risk, disregarding the first and most basic right, the right to life. 

The DSD maintains that baby abandonment denies children their right to a family name and cultural heritage, but the applicants insist that life must come first. “Without life, there can be no talk of family or culture,” they say. 

The legal battle also threatens the survival of Door of Hope, which has provided a safe haven for Johannesburg’s most vulnerable children for more than two decades. Despite the temporary court order in its favour, the organisation has been denied state funding, putting its ongoing operations at risk. 

Baby Savers as a Lifeline 

Advocates stress that baby saver devices are never an easy option, but a last resort for desperate mothers. “Unsafe abandonment should never be an option,” Baby Savers SA emphasises. 

As the court deliberates on extending the temporary order, the outcome could shape South Africa’s child protection framework for years to come. For the thousands of babies whose lives hang in the balance, the decision is more than a legal technicality, it is a matter of survival. 

Conviction.co.za 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.    

 

Baby saver devices Baby Savers SA child protection Door of Hope Human Rights
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

Related Posts

How March and March turned a deadline into a death sentence for migrants in South Africa

July 23, 2026

Lawyers face the music for poor court papers in asylum case, ordered to repay client

July 23, 2026

Court approves surrogacy where second wife carries child for first wife under customary law

July 22, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 8   +   8   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Special Reports
3 Mins Read

Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students

By Conviction Staff ReporterJuly 26, 20263 Mins Read

The Unisa Law Clinic is inviting donations of quality pre-loved business attire to help LLB students prepare for interviews, court observations and practical legal training.

Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises

July 25, 2026

African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children

July 25, 2026

Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa

July 24, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

Labour Court stops municipal disciplinary hearing over AI citation concerns

July 22, 2026

Wedding rehearsal or workplace protest? Judge rules in favour of singing mineworkers

July 21, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by