Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Pretoria High Court to decide whether baby savers are criminals or lifesavers

May 5, 2026

High Court protects essential water pipeline at Sefako Makgatho University

May 5, 2026

Medical failures left woman infertile and permanently scarred

May 5, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Pretoria High Court to decide whether baby savers are criminals or lifesavers
  • High Court protects essential water pipeline at Sefako Makgatho University
  • Medical failures left woman infertile and permanently scarred
  • A chance flight with Adv Dumisa Ntsebeza SC became a masterclass in law and purpose
  • Fast cars, denied claims and the high cost of speeding in South Africa
  • Bill prohibits removed judges and Chapter 9 office bearers from entering elected office
  • MTN loses bid to dismiss worker despite prior warnings and defiance
  • Court dismisses bid to remove News24 article on controversial Ekurhuleni toilet tender
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Hospital’s medical negligence during childbirth caused baby’s brain injury and cerebral palsy
Civil Law

Hospital’s medical negligence during childbirth caused baby’s brain injury and cerebral palsy

The Supreme Court of Appeal confirmed that Itokolle Clinix Private Hospital’s negligent maternity care led to a baby’s brain injury, dismissing the hospital’s appeal and reinforcing accountability in childbirth.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliOctober 17, 2025Updated:October 17, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Itokolle Clinix Hospital, found liable by the Supreme Court of Appeal for medical negligence during childbirth after its appeal was dismissed.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

• Court finds hospital liable for medical negligence during childbirth.
• Experts confirm prolonged oxygen deprivation caused the baby’s brain injury.
• Appeal dismissed with costs after the hospital rejected a fair settlement offer.

The Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that Itokolle Clinix Private Hospital was negligent during childbirth, causing a baby to suffer a severe brain injury and lifelong cerebral palsy.

The court found that nurses failed to monitor the mother’s contractions and the baby’s heartbeat, allowing oxygen deprivation to go undetected until it caused lasting harm.

The mother, known as MNT, gave birth at the Mahikeng-based hospital in January 2007 under the care of obstetrician Dr Kofi Ofori Amanfo. Her daughter, referred to as D, was delivered after a difficult labour but was not breathing and had no heartbeat at birth. Though resuscitated after 20 minutes, the baby suffered permanent brain damage that left her quadriplegic.

Expert evidence exposes critical failures

Medical experts testified that the baby’s brain injury was caused by long periods of oxygen deprivation that hospital staff failed to notice. Professor Johan Smith, a neonatologist, described the failure as catastrophic. “The administration of syntocinon at 20:45 was the last straw that broke the camel’s back,” he said, referring to a labour-inducing drug given without proper supervision.

Professor Coetzee, an obstetrician, supported this view, saying the baby’s oxygen reserves were “consistently depleted” while staff failed to take action. Their testimony showed that proper monitoring could have completely prevented the injury.

Accountability and vicarious liability confirmed

Judge P Coppin, writing for a unanimous bench, held that hospital staff were negligent and their conduct fell far below professional standards. “The hospital’s midwives were causally negligent in handling the respondent’s labour, and their negligence caused the harm suffered by D,” the court stated.

The court reaffirmed the principle of vicarious liability, making the hospital legally responsible for its employees’ actions. The judgment stressed that hospitals must provide attentive maternity care and that lapses in monitoring can lead to devastating, lifelong consequences.

Hospital’s appeal dismissed and costs awarded

The hospital’s appeal was dismissed with costs after the court found it had unreasonably rejected a settlement offer before trial. The mother had proposed to settle if the hospital accepted 85% liability, but it countered with only 50%.

“The hospital’s conduct in these circumstances was shown not to have been reasonable,” the court noted. It ordered the hospital to pay all legal costs, including attorney fees, citing the unnecessary delay in litigation.

The court stated that “had the midwives properly monitored the fetus, the brain injury could probably have been avoided”.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Clickhereto follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

cerebral palsy Healthcare Accountability medical negligence during childbirth patient rights Supreme Court of Appeal
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Medical failures left woman infertile and permanently scarred

    May 5, 2026

    Top court orders fresh look at 30-year sentence in robbery case to determine fairness

    April 29, 2026

    Woman fracturing ankle on unsafe construction surface contributed to her fall

    April 28, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 10   +   6   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Human Rights
    4 Mins Read

    Pretoria High Court to decide whether baby savers are criminals or lifesavers

    By Kennedy MudzuliMay 5, 20264 Mins Read

    From 5 to 7 May 2026, the High Court in Pretoria will hear a case on whether the safe surrender of newborn babies through baby saver mechanisms is wrongly treated as child abandonment under South African law.

    High Court protects essential water pipeline at Sefako Makgatho University

    May 5, 2026

    Medical failures left woman infertile and permanently scarred

    May 5, 2026

    A chance flight with Adv Dumisa Ntsebeza SC became a masterclass in law and purpose

    May 4, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Pretoria High Court to decide whether baby savers are criminals or lifesavers

    May 5, 2026

    High Court protects essential water pipeline at Sefako Makgatho University

    May 5, 2026

    Medical failures left woman infertile and permanently scarred

    May 5, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.